Why did the developers remove the horses? (Assassin's Creed: Revelations)
As we know there were horses in the Brotherhood, so why were they removed from Revelation?First, Constantinople is more densely built up than Rome. Secondly, the relief of Istanbul has steeper elevation changes. And thirdly, the ropes were added, what does not suit you? Personally, I don’t miss horses at all
Yes, Rome is one turn more densely built up than Constantinople, there are already side streets (in Constantinople)
I agree with GarretSSS
In Rome, a freer location there really needed a horse, but in Constantinople it was unnecessary ..
Samuele Mangano
in Rome, dense buildings were only in the center: the outskirts were deserted. In Constantinople, any area looks like the center of Rome (in terms of development)
And I would like the horses back ... it's good that at least the tunnels weren't removed: D
I didn’t like to ride horses in the city, because passers-by didn’t go out of the way. It looks pretty stupid to throw people around like pins all the way.
Arti Jesso it's
good that at least the tunnels weren't removed.
By the way, the tunnels are somehow badly located: if you want to use it, you will have to stomp after it into the neighboring area. In Rome, it was somehow more dense with this network
Well, in Rome, at least there was where to ride them, and in Constantinople, there are only alleys.
ps: in the brotherhood, the guards on horseback sometimes interfered ...
Horses are not needed here at all, because Istanbul is small, there is really nowhere to accelerate ... and they do not suit the atmosphere of the game.