Fantasy
Who reads science fiction?Now the chronicles of Amber Zelazny have come into my hands, all ten under one cover, I read it here. In general, I really like Lukyanenko ...
Mushroom obviously you did not understand the meaning of the topic.
I ask everyone to tell me what kind of science fiction they like to read, since I myself have read dofiga and I want to read more.
I read a lot of different science fiction, I will write those writers whose books I remember and liked the most:
David Gammel, Andrzej Sapkowski, Robert Jordan, George Martin, David Eddings, Terry Goodkind, Dmitry Voronin, Sergey Lukyanenko and many many others...
Vampires may be an old topic, but no one has been able to break it down like Anne Rice. All have aspen stakes, holy symbols, and even silver. Opupee opupeoza - this is when a person, after being bitten by a vampire, becomes a vampire himself (I thought that sucking all the blood could only kill someone). The books about vampire slayers piss me off, especially how stupid they make the vampires themselves. Only one writer thought of rehabilitating nosferatum.
As for the gothic or non-gothic nature of the book: let's talk about which goths are "true" and which are not.
By the way, this is not even about the topic of vampires: among them there are many types of characters of real people. If you, Bhelial, could not see it, I can't help you. Unless you sympathize.
2Warrior of the Gray League:
You can find books of many science fiction writers in electronic form in the library of the site
http://darkgrot.ru
I can't say the exact URL of the library: I don't remember.
Yes, it’s unpleasant to read electronically, but for me it has become the only way to read some non-pop stuff.
A few drooling vampires who love each other to the core and sob throughout the book (I'm exaggerating, of course, but still) - this is not something I would like to read about.
PS
I, you see, could not notice that "Among the vampires, there are many types of characters of real people." Please explain the meaning of your clumsy phrase.
I also love Garrison with his "Rat" and Henry Kuttner - he writes fantastic novels, many of them are gloomy and in almost all the main character dies, but that's why they are short stories to end unexpectedly.
Sergey SADOV I
recommend to everyone!!! read almost in a chokehold
1. KNIGHT OF THE ORDER Part 3
The case of a restless soul,
I still read the names I don’t remember continuous adventures and fantasies.
2 Nick Pirumov reads a little harder
a series of Evial chronicles, the war of the gods, a land without joy, a diamond sword-wooden sword, a tetralogy keeper of swords I have books 15
waiting for the magician's war 3.
Wolfhound all books
2Bhelial
So I don't like to quarrel with people, but for some reason people love to quarrel with me.
If it still doesn't reach you now, it means "Interview with the Vampire" and so on. It's useless for you to read. The fact is that in these books there is such a subtle originality that you either notice it and understand it completely, or you don’t notice it at all and even begin to brag about it in front of everyone. So be it, I will give an analogy, without pointing to the characters specifically. And then it will be completely uninteresting to read.
one). Have you met people who, because of some personal trifle, begin to blame and hate everyone?
2). And those who value their freedom so much that they are afraid to limit someone else's?
3). Those who at one point realize that their whole life has no logical continuation? (I mean not only vampires who have not kept up with progress).
4). Those who, in order to hide their true emotions, completely change their character, put on a mask, afraid to take it off? (hint: which of all the vampires looked the most unnatural?)
, etc.
PS When I wrote this, I was thinking of different characters, so the characters implied in each paragraph are not repeated.
Well, Bhelial, dare to solve my puzzle? (Or rather, Anne Rice's rebus).
If the originality of the book lies ONLY in the characters of the characters, then this reading is not to my liking. Oblomov can be read with the same success, it doesn’t matter that he lies on the couch for the first 150 pages, but how his character is revealed! And you can even watch a soap opera, that's for sure passions. I have enough real people in my life, but from a book, especially a fantastic one, I first of all expect a strong storyline. The fact is that this is not in the Vampire Chronicles, but there are two vampires whose behavior resembles, excuse me, homosexuals.
one). You twisted my words. I already wrote that the originality of the book lies in a new point of view on the vampire myth (or not a myth, whoever thinks). Deeply developed characters are a side effect, contrasting the stupidity of vampires in most other books about them. By the way, a positive side effect.
2). Rice's vampires are not homosexual, because they have no sexual attraction to anyone. Their alternative is to drink blood, and here the relationship of the sexes does not play any role.
However, if you do not like these books so much, I did not force and do not force you to read them.
I know they're not homosexual, they just act the same, but it's still gross. The topic is revealed in an original way, the lyrics were a success, but those who want lyrics read Onegin and so on, and they will arrogantly turn up their noses from vampires, while those who, on the contrary, want fantasy (fiction, gothic) after reading the Vampire Chronicles will turn their noses up from excessive lyrics! Of course, there are exceptions, such as Master O. So read Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles and decide for yourself whether you like it or not.
I wouldn't say. I understand that it was written in the devil knows what year, but this technical naivete infuriates me. A spaceship with a screw cap! I can't read, and I don't really want to.