3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
n
nik.net 11.05.22 09:35 pm

Who launched on what hardware? (Dying Light)

Interested in such a question, but will the game run on a dual-core processor ?? Who could run?
PS I can not download the game and test it yet.
249 Comments
Sort by:
S
Sentenso 11.05.22

i7 4790
gtx 770
8gb
At maximum 25 fps

"Optimization" is worse than in Unity AC

C
CTaLLuH1 11.05.22


i5 3550
gtx 760
8 gb ram
totally low. FPS from 40-50. It's impossible to play. Terrible lags are felt

z
zerfallen 11.05.22

P G2020 6GB RAM GT630 medium settings, works without problems

A
Arty 11.05.22

on my laptop i5-3230m, 8gb ram, gt640m 2gb went quietly to medium with anti-aliasing enabled, you can even try medium-high...

B
Bomber 11.05.22

zerfallen
yes, it’s going quite cheerfully, it’s sweet.

g
gennaz 11.05.22

Launched on iron which is in the profile, 30-60 FPS on average without lotions from nvidia (damn it)!

D
DimakSerpg 11.05.22

Gray_Wolf 95 what is the secret? Why do I have 15-30 fps on the minimum (cut down all the hbao goodies, anti-aliasing, textures, shadows, etc.) with a GTX 760, i5 2500s, 8 Gb and most importantly a square monitor with a resolution of 1280x1024.
Of course, in a shelter or indoors, FPS is 50-80, so what? Not much to play outside. Even the eyes get tired (

I read the comments of other owners of 760 and 770, so it turns out that you are a balabol.

B
BLATNOY1 11.05.22

DimakSerpg
I'm not a balabol, but you are a teapot. Lower the textures in the main menu to medium, and the other you can put hot on ultra. I lowered the textures and everything else on high. And I lowered the resolution a little, native 1680-1050, I play with 1600-1020. Fps sometimes drops to 45 and sometimes rises to 65-9. It’s nice to play, it doesn’t hurt your eyes, and there’s not much difference between the textures. High textures require 3 Gb of video memory. You should sort yourself out before calling anyone else.

Yes, and here's another fool, turn off the vertical, she releases 30+ FPs, eats a lot. If you slowed down the textures, then you simply cannot have 15-30 Fps on your configuration. People with a weaker configuration play with a larger one, I will give myself an example. The textures are average, the vertical is disabled, the resolution is slightly reduced (maybe it’s not necessary, I had it reduced before), the draw distance is slightly reduced, everything else at high Fps does not fall below 45 and does not rise above 69, both indoors and outdoors . You figure it out in your computer balabol.

B
BLATNOY1 11.05.22

CTaLLuH1
Did you turn off the vertical line?

R
RezEvil 11.05.22

GeForce GTS 450
Norm goes

K
King_sombra 11.05.22

http://ark.intel.com/en/products/65509/Intel-Core-i5-3330-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_20-GHz will it work?

H
Hitrii 11.05.22

Spoiler
o_O textures are average, draw distance is slightly below average, shadow maps are low, foliage is high, the rest is disabled, at 1280 * 1024 25-35 fps, there is no sagging in the city, there is when running through thick grass. Vidyuha plug life 440. I launched it on this one :-D

V
VenomSRT 11.05.22

3570k
gtx560@930Mhz
minimum settings
1920x1200
50 fps outdoors

D
DimakSerpg 11.05.22

Gray_Wolf 95 are you blind? "Why do I have 15-30 fps on the minimum"
Perhaps you have so many fps in the building, but not outside, please don't be ridiculous.
"You should sort yourself out before you call anyone names."
And why did you write this? Blind-eyed!
"Yes, and here's another fool, turn off the vertical, it releases 30+ FPs, eats a lot."
No, you really are some kind of down) They
wrote to you that they are minimal, why are you writing this?

I lowered the shadows to ultra-low (I didn’t know what was possible even lower) and lowered the range to the limit, it seems to be normal, for now.

-
-Al-ex- 11.05.22

Processor: AMD FX(tm) 6300 Six-Core Processor, ~3.8 GHz, Memory: 8192MB RAM, Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB, OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.
I locked the game for 30 frames and I play on medium with anti-aliasing and vertical without nvidio bells and whistles. Yes, and it is better to completely cut down the viewing distance, it is only for the top!

P
Pretecs 11.05.22

Gtx 550 ti, 4 ram, intel 2 duo. Low ~20fps

M
Mantamu 11.05.22

Athlon IIx4 640 -3.1Ghz / 4Gb RAM / RADEON R7 200(HD7770) win10x64-medium-low

B
BLATNOY1 11.05.22

DimakSerpg
"Yes, and here's another fool, turn off the vertical, it releases 30+ FPs, eats a lot."
No, you're really down some)
Why did you write this argument. Even in the building I had 30 no more than 30, turned off the vertical and Fps rose by 25-30 Fps.

They wrote to you that they are minimal, why are you writing this?
I set everything to a minimum, the textures were set to high, the horror frizzed as much, lowered the resolution and textures to medium, Fps gave out, as I already wrote, 45-60 (sometimes it only sometimes drops by 40 fps with a large crowd of zombies and sudden movements, but this game is not interferes) it's on the street. And in the rooms it does not fall below 50, the maximum gives out 65. Textures change only in the main menu, keep this in mind. You slow them down, and if the game continues to give out only 15-30 Fps, then the problem is in your computer for sure. The quality of foliage can also be reduced, although the increase in Fps is small.
In the beginning, yes, I even had a maximum of 30 Fps indoors, when I turned off the vertical it went up to 50+, and when I went outside, your result is even better than mine, 10-25- Fps, the game freezes horror right up to 3 Fps fell, played with the settings, reduced everything to a minimum and the game was more or less playable. But the friezes remained when cornering, although not so strong. Then, in the main menu, I lowered the textures to medium resolution, slightly lowered, and turned everything else on completely (vertical is disabled), the foliage is medium and the range is slightly reduced from the usual (but not completely). Fps 45 (Sometimes 40) 60+, this is on the street. I don’t know what’s going on with you since the configuration is more powerful than mine, but I outlined to you what gives me.
I'm not measured here by anyone how it flies and what Fps it gives out. If I was lying here, then I could also lie about iron to make it more convincing. But I'm not going to prove anything, and I'm not going to argue with you. It's just that if you really get only 15-30 Fps with this configuration, then dig a little better and find acceptable settings for your hardware. From the fact that you believe me and check what I write to you, it will not get worse for you. But you definitely need to prove that you are right in everything and you will not accept the truth.

k
klas32658 11.05.22

no one tried to run on dx10
http://s017.radikal.ru/i414/1501/6e/da62c502fab0.png

A
AdroV 11.05.22

I ran it on this hardware
// Intel Core I3 3.5 GHz
// 8 GB of RAM
// AMD RADEON R9 270X, 4 GB /

All at maximum speed. On the street, the FPS noticeably dropped, turned off anti-aliasing and reduced the drawing distance, and everything went without lags.