Who launched on what hardware? (Dying Light)
Interested in such a question, but will the game run on a dual-core processor ?? Who could run?PS I can not download the game and test it yet.
RipBoy
hands need to grow from that place, you stupid shkolota. Did you even read one of my posts? Not stable 60 Fps, but runs at least 40 and maximum 65+. But not on the ultras straight, read the posts before writing heresy. You have excellent hardware, but you don’t know how to set up games so that you can play comfortably and beautifully. Yes, I have textures on medium, and everything else on high. And I play with a beautiful picture with 45-65+ Fps. You pay attention to what you are advised. I also tried setting everything to minimum and textures to high, but the game froze and Fps ran from 20 to 45+, even when everything else was at a minimum. The textures on medium and the game flew low, but I feel comfortable playing when the Fps does not fall below 40, so I turned everything else back on. I feel sorry for your iron, oh, what a pity.
CTaLLuH1
I don't know, at the beginning when GG woke up, it was 30 Fps, but when I turned it off, it went up to 20+ Fps. With friezes, the problem is solved by reducing the quality of the textures. Set the texture to medium.
Gray_Wolf 95 Hey, son of a dog, hide where you came from and don't open your filthy mouth anymore, freak. You will yelp when the command is given to you.
A3ON
The reliability of tests with gamegpu tends to zero. These morons test not in difficult places for the system, but anyhow where and anyhow.
Here is the data from the official nvidia website
http://international.download.nvidia.com/geforce-com/international/images/dying-light/dying-light-view-distance-performance-overclocked-cpu.png
RipBoy
Hey you, son of a dog, hide where you came from and don't open your filthy mouth anymore, freak. You will yelp when the command is given to you.
Spoiler
I launched and played on my hardware, there were no crashes, the computer in the profile hung a little (everything on medium 1680x1050).
My laptop with the configuration: Intel core i3 3120m 2.5 Hz., 6 GB of RAM, 8750m graphics card gives fps from 10-40, 15-20 fps on average, with the lowest settings and a resolution of 1366x768.
core i5 gtx 780 ti 8 gig I didn’t measure the fps, it went pretty fast without lags, about 60 fps probably was. I demolished the game after 40 minutes, because I didn’t like it at all, neither in terms of graphics - soap and yellow gamma, nor in terms of plot and gameplay.
It runs great on the highest settings, fps is stable at 50-60, it rarely drops for a moment.
Amphetamine9999
What vision range do you play at? I set it to 100% - the game began to eat almost 10 GB and the FPS began to sit often below 40, put a review of 60-70% somewhere and left it permanently
i3 2 cores 3.10mhz 4GB RAM
vidyuha RADEON 7700
everything is at minimum, freezes for 10 minutes and then flies
Launched on MS Surface first generation.
Intel i5 2.6 Ghz
Intel graphics hd 4000
4 gb RAM
To do this, manually unscrew everything in the system files to a minimum. Disabled shadows, particles, min. Textures, etc. In general, it turned out to be playable. Average 23-18 fps.
50-54 fps on high, only shadows are average friezes 2-5sec at the beginning of videos and cut scenes, like when zombies are grabbed and you have to fight back + when the spitter hits the hero with a projectile
DimaAvr, of
course, was launched on my two nuclear lenovo laptop) 4GB of RAM for 1GB of nvidia 610m and do you know what processor? intel pentium B960 2.2Ghz: D I'm shocked and the processor is only loaded up to 50%: D and you know what fps? on the lowest settings from 13 to 25 fps :D in general, I already passed one mission)))