Discussion of optimization (Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands)
Do you like it? I can't compare the picture quality with the resources that wants the game.... But in my opinion - still very dofiga asks toy.I have high (not maksimalnykh, namely high!) i5 and gtx1060 - 45--50 fps with dips lower in fullhd. And periodically sinking Prots, periodically vidyuhi - the perfect balance to it.
Thus, to play on max in FullHD, probably you need i7 or even 1070 1080...
Therefore, the opinion of people with such configs - what are the settings and how to play?
Picture is nice, but I can't say that just wow. In my opinion, БФ1 that requires a significantly less - looks cooler. For honor - is similar (although there is, of course, very small maps). Smotricki 2 is also, IMHO, it is better optimized.
meagarry
just went in game and waiting for one will come, so can only speak about the first location, FX 8350 + gtx 1060 on ultra on high/medium you can't achieve a stable 60 frames Vert. sync does not do anything except load additional gaps frames that it that without it in General is something strange with optimization at the moment
Just Do It Again
that's it. that is strange. and cut settings even lower is not desirable, because the picture and so does not cause wow effect... Soon I also have a friend coming with a modest 370-th none. I wonder how it will work...
But it is clear that, among other things, the game is very processorsamsung. Apparently it only needs a i7.
vidyahu not warming up, optimization salochana, then rabblecast to release slowly
Just Do It Again
in the game the way off to on mixed, you turn off the vertical and it turns on.
in the graphics settings as well
maksik.ussd
I realized even at the lower settings the glow and so, of course I checked that on. with that off, and no difference
what is low that high 20-40 fps karoch HS
shake Sniper: Ghost Warrior 3 :) let's see what there
i5 - 4460. gtx 1060 6 gb, 8 operatives, without MICS. Also that on high, on ultra - high ( very high textures, anti-aliasing, rays), the difference in fps is not noticeable, or lowering, or raising, 45-50, sometimes 60, with a plane. Most likely Yes, with the release of finished, plus the driver gets out, maybe to high to be stable 60 frames. The picture also does not cause the wow effect (the same honor was impressed, location Yes, though small, but looks great).
I7-4930k - 16Gb - GTX 970 - 60-35 FPS. But this is a beta. Let's see what the release is... a video Card probably need to change + SSD finally buy games...
Well.. jump from 30 fps on the GTX 1070
Everything on max including anti-aliasing.
meagarry Yes, Full HD, i7 6700k. But GTX 1070 and Watch Dogs2 on the ultra does not pull, you know.
Lowered some settings and it was good.
DimakSerpg
well, I have a father in 1060 stable at 48-55 fps without a strong subsidence. when this setting is much closer to ultra. there's only high. the movie father certainly not worse (though perhaps not quite correct to compare - there is building, there's a lot of fine grass). only here and drawdown noticeable. have a friend with AMD 370-th General sadness-melancholy. division he goes much with a better picture. still, IMHO, not dokrutili they have something with optimization... at least on the Curling iron, take it, although where I play no one)
Well, in my system the only place a weak video card. I see no reason to spend money on 1080. Waiting for the release of Ti. Or the next generation. In General i7 6900 64GB ddr4 gtx 980ti. In FullHD on ultra felt drawdowns 30-40-50 fps. Overall performance isn't on the level. Perhaps the driver of NVIDIA slightly optimizes the system. And by the way, 6GB of VRAM is occupied only 3.5.
Gtx 960 2gb+8 gb OP+ I5 low-60, medium 45, and then I think not worth talking about
i7 3930k, sli msi x 1080, 16 ddr, ssd, 2k resolution, 25-50 fps everything on max, below put zero sense practically, the sniper, the situation is better, but there but worse at times, and there is not a fountain