Discussion of optimization (Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands)
Do you like it? I can't compare the picture quality with the resources that wants the game.... But in my opinion - still very dofiga asks toy.I have high (not maksimalnykh, namely high!) i5 and gtx1060 - 45--50 fps with dips lower in fullhd. And periodically sinking Prots, periodically vidyuhi - the perfect balance to it.
Thus, to play on max in FullHD, probably you need i7 or even 1070 1080...
Therefore, the opinion of people with such configs - what are the settings and how to play?
Picture is nice, but I can't say that just wow. In my opinion, БФ1 that requires a significantly less - looks cooler. For honor - is similar (although there is, of course, very small maps). Smotricki 2 is also, IMHO, it is better optimized.
What a strange optimization in the game, put everything on ultra (texture quality on high only) 30 fps, put high 35 fps, put back on ultra but turn off the glare of the sun steadily 42-50 fps, how strange. From smoothing in the game little help, direct this super game, I did not see another annoying such are fun, once over the fence jump ( not always, but consistently).
Spoiler
sevapva
For one game to run to buy new hardware nonsense, anyway the game itself
Optimization is not bad. But the fps drops sharply with explosions and burning cars, aim at this time is not real. if not for the helicopters, would have thrown the game. To drive on these roads on a mission just depression.
stanok40rus
just for gta5 bought two 1070. and to drink, to spend on tobacco is not nonsense?
and anyway, if you can afford it then buy. if not, then not. country assessment - delirium )))
Resolution x 3325 1871, settings on ultra minimum fps of 51, 58-62 average, the maximum was 75.
Tested in two resolutions of 1366*768 and 1920*1080,sharp drawdowns and freezes there.In 1366*768 everything is working perfectly.
1366*768
Spoiler
1920*1080
Spoiler
Yes, the problem with the graphics this game has and it's called optimization. But the confusion of type is on off I personally have no luck. Developers often neglect the optimization and game that to optimize everything in order and the requirements below looks much better.
About optimizatsii in the game and can be no question. I gives 30-50 fps. basically the game runs 40 fps. it's obviously not in the iron business and krivorukost developers.
System: i7 6700K, gtx1080, 16gm ram.
Optimize Kal full, but a bit better than the second Just Cause, and requires Kruzis in the open world
There are sudden drawdowns in the game up to 15fps no matter where you are at the moment and at the same time you managed to start the game once and it ran 30-40fps stably how can this be?
The optimizon in the game is like this, but the graphon is very even at the level and by today's standards
Whoever has AMD cards, in principle, applies to all games, and this one in particular, turn off all sorts of Nvidia chips such as hairworks, physics, etc., they work poorly on AMD cards, which, in principle, is no wonder and is sharpened only to work through a card from Nvidia , it will not be processed normally by the CPU. This game has such an option as "turf effect", it works through nvidia gameworks, disabling this option alone made the game quite playable, removed friezes and lags. However, with AMD cards, the processor dependence of this game increases significantly, of course it was unrealistic to play 4k on the 2080s card, but at the minimum it was over 100 fps, on the card from AMD there are drawdowns in loading it even at 4k, although the gameplay is quite comfortable and smooth
I have 70 frames on 4080 in 2k resolution on ultras, despite the fact that the processor is loaded at 5 percent, and the card at 60. And how to solve this problem when the monitor is 240Hz ????
Manettmxn
Clean the system of rubbish and change hands to more direct ones.
3070ti, 16gb ram, R5 5600x, 2k 240hz ultrawide screen - ultra settings. Frame rate 95-100 fps. Or do you want to squeeze all 240? What for?
Salarych
Salarych wrote:
Or do you want to squeeze all 240? What for?
That is, if he wants to for the sake of online play on ultras.
Manettmxn wrote:
I have 70 frames on 4080 in 2k resolution on ultras,
maybe the vertical is on, isn't it? In general it is strange, but it is necessary to write a config in more detail. I even have an ancient protsak in 4k fps above 80 at 4090
Palych Rokov
Are you smart or stupid???????????????????
This ...... la game eats the graphic component to the fullest! As in Divizhka, the stone rests. And when the game is launched in the face of 4090, then your performance "Even with the ancient bugger in 4k FPS above 80 at 4090" smacks of pathos)))))))))))
I would say my frame size in this game ................)))))) It's better to keep silent.