What to choose? 5500xt VS GTX1660
After a long analysis of the market of video cards, compare the characteristics and relationships of my budget opted for these accelerators. Torn between these two options. 1660 a little faster and eats less, but it has 6Gb Vram vs 8Gb at 5500xt(video card with less than 6Gb vram amount is no longer relevant, unless of course you're not going to play with the minimum quality textures on a 720p monitor).And here I think one will have to reduce the graphics settings in games because there is not enough memory, on the other - because it is slower than the first.
Help to determine the choice. Thank you.
Alexander Kozlov E.
DDR is the most exacting on this point, the game at least one, not a bad benchmark for graphics cards, in other games the situation is directly proportional to, do not eat more than 6 gigs of VRAM, at medium to high settings, which are designed and 1660 5500, so 8 gigs last makes no sense at all ,to the author I would recommend to look at 1660 super, it is not much more expensive, but memory гддр6, it is faster and throughput is higher, so it's best to look at the quality and not the amount of VRAM, in this case
Afour
There are games which are at medium to high devour are more than 6 GB of memory.
Alexander Kozlov E.
In Regarde worth 23000 but you can for 20 to find, so it is yours ! date 20 Dec 19:04 !
So you're blind ! Of regard was one of the examples of low price but can be for 20,000 pieces to find ! Only here look for this store itself is I'm not engaged ))) About the drain also can not pour Fuwa wrote the same thing !
Alexander Kozlov E.
And do not cling to words of mister-genius who do not know what 5500xt only 8 lines !
Alexander Kozlov E.
citing the example of one game on a medium to high will eat more than 6 gigs of VRAM
Afour
Fuwa wrote:
In RE2, on max settings is not enough even 12(!)GB Vram.(Only one quality setting textures requires 8Gb to the maximum value):
Spoiler
I played it on the card with two gigs of Vram, and if the settings in the game to set values at which the video memory is not enough - the game starts freezes.
Afour wrote:
citing the example of one game on a medium to high will eat more than 6 gigs of VRAM
It's a trick question. It is foolish to talk about it, all depends on the game settings, in particular resolution. And of course medium to high - 6 enough. Above did not catch the chip, one with a VIDOS YouTube's sitting, the second at gtx1080. The General lack of VRAM kompensiruet RAM, which is not good, especially with 16GB, where the monitoring virtual memory + paging file, file CPU and Windows issues more than physical, in easy at least 1-2GB in games and 4-6 difference, won above comrade and caught the friezes, because he didn't have enough RAM. Like RAM, VRAM does not happen much.
In my case, at 1080 in games: ARK, New dawn textures 4k, Call of Duty Modern Warfare Remastered, Quake Champions, Rise of the Tomb Raider was more than 6-7 GB. But the question is if the 1080 pulls these games are, relatively to 60 frames 1060 and you are twisting the same settings and get 30-40 frames of video memory to be consumed no less in case there tagging each of the aforementioned current.
Luka_gg
Luka_gg wrote:
second on gtx1080
I do not guess.
Luka_gg wrote:
where the monitoring virtual memory + paging file, file CPU and Windows issues more than physical
Always monitor the physical memory.
And a start is always from her.
Luka_gg wrote:
But the question is if the 1080 pulls these games are, relatively to 60 frames
But with some 1% and 0.1% fps?
Play the game with statename too not comme Il faut.
Yes you che, podureli? What nafig rx5500, rx5700? Or 1660Super or 2060, depending on budget.
The Day Shepard
Or maybe just 2080ti?
A person has the choice either 1660 or 5500xt.
5500xt have more memory in the future, support better.
1660 faster, but still a year and a half will work, then in the pumpkin to develop.
Fuwa
Rx 590 and you have not considered?
Is the same, but better than 5500xt and 1660.