The results in the benchmarks v.5
In this topic, measured by PI... parrots in popular benchmarks.Previous topic
Note: screenshots must be hidden under the spoiler! Otherwise, posts that contain screenshots, not removed under the spoiler, will be deleted!
Lex-one wrote:
Wd2=Watch dogs 2
Here the theme of ' benci, where are the games? )))
Found Cho. Here Intel has long been far away, because it is running in 4K UHD, and amode still at the bottom in full HD floundering. ))))
Therefore, this measure is useless, because you are no one game in 4K UHD will not show, you will only crow. For SIM all.
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
Maybe because for 1500X the native frequency of 1,600 MHz? )
Rukalitso.Motherboard denomination 2133Мгц puts ITSELF.No 1600, I have not seen.And 2667Мгц not put either 2400MHz or 3000Мгц (originally 2993Мгц).In any case, on my motherboard so.But reducing the only timings on 2133Мгц'Ah does not provide the lower latency, you need frequency and RAM, and CPU to raise
Lex-one
put in afterburner frequency Oper-key on the screen. there is - if 4 strips of 2400 chst, together 9600. in games which frisat (watch dogs 2, batman an), it (frequency) exceeds 10 and even closer to 12. am I right to assume that the freezes are because of this?
oranzheviymamont
No, you don't understand how working memory.
In your motherboard there is only two channel, cityregional no.
Speed consists only of two planks, if it is simple.
So it makes no sense for speed to buy 4 straps in two-channel system.
And so you have a good ssd and the RAM to change for best results.
Lex-one
the solution is to buy two laths on 8 GB. with chst 3200. and desirable change to ssd? in short guys, I oak oak. but if so, the strap will change to days, then the person from the forum told me in a personal will help you choose. also a colleague at work said microfreeze may occur due of PD.
Lodurr
Ask AMD
But in this video, what strap are included on 1066MHz?What do you think?
Lodurr
-Why are you hiding in the bushes, if you already went on the attack?Himself see support straps DDR4 frequency at 1066MHz.May have under AMD macplay support 1866MHz.Just me are what?
Lodurr
I have no problems posed Corsair.With a frequency of 2400MHz set 11-12-12-32 and 1.27 v.Test Аиде64 held, in hands did not reach
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
I have no problems posed Corsair
This can not be. )
For example, this percent has already been demonstrated:
Spoiler.png)
The right table of frequencies, timings, and latency. Left the control in real time.
More proof of how fabulous Aida terrible. It shows on the Maxim 1200MHz with the timings 15-35, and latency 55нс. In fact on the bus the memory is running low multiplier in percent 1067мгц, timings and 14-32 latency 49. And since the reduced multiplier, and memory frequency does not match the required timings do not match, it gives the tire a maximum of 1000 MHz, a little more, and not native 1067(2133Мгц). On the Intel, which is not the point, the percent will still be trying to work on native frequency. So on the Intel.
As for AMD it is necessary to look. You have AMD, here and see. )
Denis Kyokushin
What you looking at on the controller memory? ))
By the way, too, at 800MHz should be the latency 37 and 42 shows, as in 933Мгц. I just have the system unit is assembled under 7700К, and is 7600К, and these benci brains boiled, they do not know what to say. xD))
The only one who shows really what happens is the CMI info.
1000, there 999,8 shows the system status in percent, ie, bus.
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
AMD here it is:
So you have a ratio of 3:47, it is necessary 1565,7 to divide by 3, you get 522, ie, 555-560Мгц on the bus.
560х2=1120, i.e. 2133Мгц.
I.e. the parameters must be 666Мгц and 2133Мгц, but these parameters will he not much fits. How cool is that? )
You're the best in the CMI info to make a screen like mine, there is much clearer.
Lodurr
Wow, your posts are cleaned up.
Can not conductive to spread HWInfo,my screen was ready in advance.I schA at work
Lodurr wrote:
So you have a ratio of 3:47, it is necessary 1565,7 to divide by 3, you get 522, ie, 555-560Мгц on the bus.
Came to the chief and ran away))).And where is the conclusion of your complex mathematical calculations?)))
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
So you have a ratio of 3:47, it is necessary 1565,7 to divide by 3, you get 522, ie, 555-560Мгц on the bus.
560х2=1120, i.e. 2133Мгц.
I.e. the parameters must be 666Мгц and 2133Мгц, but these parameters will he not much fits. How cool is that? )
You're the best in the CMI info to make a screen like mine, there is much clearer.
AHHH OUUUUU.
That's what you gave the man a joke.
Lodurr wrote:
Latency, the delay between ticks, and should be, it is tied to the timings
Yeah DRAM Command Rate. If 2T +4 nanoseconds. the delay between the stages of the controller.
Lodurr wrote:
put the empty Windows, to cheat the numbers to make one screenshot and run to brag about
Of course now it higher was 47, was 52. You had 57, was 65.
Lodurr wrote:
Latency, the delay between ticks
Now here, where the lower the latency, there is less than the time required for memory to perform read, write, and copy. So, I lowered, and you got the cosmic figures, while for all speed read, write and copy-you have the same leave much to be desired. Because the speed is access to the data in the RAM. Total coupe latency + speed will pull to give the best performance figures of the system.
Lodurr wrote:
And Intel with this all sad, they're much better at its native frequency and native timings.
Stuck in 2006 / 2008. I knew. But that is so. Generally there appeared a new integrated memory controller, now sense even to speak about no.
Lodurr wrote:
So you have a ratio of 3:47, it is necessary 1565,7 to divide by 3, you get 522, ie, 555-560Мгц on the bus.
Yeah. 47 : 3 this is 100*47 / 3 = 1566 (frequency multiplied by 2, we get 3133).
DRAM / FSB Ratio is 47 / 3 = of 15.66. Times the FSB frequency (It is BCLK*2, where BCLK = 100), then of 15.66*100 = 1566 (or 3133). That's still possible.
Then what?
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
.And where is the conclusion of your complex mathematical calculations?)
And a screenshot of where? )
As if I need it.
Luka_gg wrote:
You had 57, was 65.
55, 65 with 4-hole applications, despite the fact that Aida is lying like breathing. Where's your screenshot with 4 running apps? )))
Lodurr wrote:
Where's your screenshot with 4 running apps? )))
Everything is clear to you. The answer to one question, everything else is merged. I will not write more. You switch to what's best for you, but in fact waste time and throw on the flood. PS I called the number already running applications. moreover, there are specified numbers of work, after 11 days of work, already scored 16 of 32GB.
You've had enough of this. Dosvidos.
Spoiler
Locii, LaCie never changes.