The results in the benchmarks v.5
In this topic, measured by PI... parrots in popular benchmarks.Previous topic
Note: screenshots must be hidden under the spoiler! Otherwise, posts that contain screenshots, not removed under the spoiler, will be deleted!
The first test of the new system on France. Percent good, memory is not particularly chasing, but the motherboard furious furiously.
cine11
PS cache 5.28 GHz
-SK.art-
No, he's got -40 on the cover, and a maximum of +20 on the cores under load. Anyway killing people is not the vcore, vio kills people (or vsa)
Sorry 5500 is not picked up, a little lacking ahlada, freeca leaves much to be desired.
Today finally got some acceptable result with skylake. To test for a long time, but at least some understanding there.
tWRWR tried to drop down to 4 but the result didn't change.
Maximus VIII hero of course will not fit, 4GHz memory not ship to any, even the 3800 had to finish off a bus already in the OS. Need somewhere to search for Asrock MOCF.
XTU 5G
PS did Walid 5,9 GHz but as it turned out, screwed up slow mod and in the end, savaldi 800MHz)
DartMaul wrote:
digestible result skylake
DartMaul wrote:
Maximus VIII hero of course will not fit, 4GHz memory not ship to any, even the 3800 had to finish off a bus already in the OS. Need somewhere to search for Asrock MOCF.
I still think that someone a lot to eat...))
-SK.art-
You know, my Obodovsky the result is in part because I can't boot at 4GHz C12, as do people who get 1790+ points in XTU at 5GHz CPU. And I can not do because my memory may not, and not even because the IMC in percents weak, but simply because the Mat Board is, in principle, refuses to do so. Yesterday I spent 4 hours on something to remove this result, and at least 3 of them I spent on it to get through 55 and 41 error codes and boot into BIOS a known-working settings.
Put the settings and you 55 code, press retry, 55 again, again, again, God forbid the times from the 5th she loaded.
DartMaul
Short funny, your [email protected] GHz in the render, gives the result by 0.02 points less than 5930К 4.2 GHz, sorry for the tenure will not leave
fin1977 wrote:
a little something
where is that enough? The test graphs are more than 2 times above, clearly the case because of sly, but hike my cards frequencies higher than you. A test of the processor partially depends on the frequency of memory. You have what is memory? And the processor on what frequency works?
PS: here in the topic above I found my old score on my previous 4670к CPU @ 4.3 GHz with one card 970, a common result higher than you.
http://forums.playground.ru/hardware/rezultaty_v_benchmarkah_v_5-839031/#comment-13117683
http://valid.x86.fr/1xbxft
Not that the result, but the order was removed.
(on France)
• CPU: Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.8 GHz
• MB: ASRock Z87 Extreme4
• RAM: 24GB Hynix 1866 MHz
• Video 1: MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 100ME [1500/7800]
• Video 2: MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 4G [1500/7800]
• SSD: 500 GB Samsung 850 Evo
• OC: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
• GeForce Game Ready Driver 368.81
3DMark 11
3DMark 13
-SK.art-
A normal result for 970's!!!! I think now while they are still not rotten and if you're focused on SLI - you can wait and save up for two 1080TI. I wonder how much will be the price we have....
