Power saving function
When overclocking Ryzen 5 1500X to 3700Мгц found the lack of functioning saving. What's the catch?Config in a profile.In the BIOS feature is enabledSo with overclocking:
[Denis]
Old to get not hunting (at the time, he datestyle in the games - remember unpleasant), and to make a stand, I at least have to remove the PSU and one of the drives of the system unit (spare no), and how else to make screenshots?
4790К
[Denis]
Something reminds me of it. Recommendation with power supply 24+4 pin. Somewhere I already heard it, it's terribly suspicious, and very bad, beware, it looks like one of the personalities of Loki.
Don't know what he means by that but sounds completely out of place and is not the case.
The variation in voltage is valid for ALL bps within 5%. No You will not show. Meanwhile, look for them in BIOS e, some sort of AIDA 64, etc. programs, sometimes very controversial, because unable to lie. The best way to verify the hands and the tester. But even so, You have a deviation within the norm.
You don't need the PSU power connector motherboard 24+4, You have no such fees, the standard 24 pin. More do not invent and do not wrap yourself too much.The more expensive, overpayment per Gigabyte, PSU with platinum certification.
I don't know when and where and what to look for. Sad.
By the WAY! I could test the 4790k, however, I have in the dispersal 4700, and throw it I won't it's a reboot, and the PC all the knocks, don't want to.
VOVAN WOLF
It is for such rubbish 5930К that asks 1.35 V on the core to stock frequency?
BigInteger
Any old slop and 5930k is no (comparison attached). I knew that somebody will blow up. Is the 1600S, so he asks to 1.35 at frequency 3800.
P. S. the Message can be put in one. Use.
P. p. S. the Trouble with the distinguished fellow Denis A., energosberegenie does not work when overclocking, but the CPU test is necessary, and always in the GPU-Z.
VOVAN WOLF
Energosberegenie in default works,and when changing Energonika in Windows during 100% load now includes all core to 3600Мгц.Overclocking to me is not necessary.Needs to be,when the map will change.You know,when two cores are working at half strength,that's not ice.Hence the question of energy saving in acceleration
Lodurr
Lodurr
What are the consequences,if not,how are you?
You do not mind that I have in the BIOS without overclocking voltage range Vcore 1.428 v,but HWINFO is a maximum acceleration 1.238 v issues?
BigInteger
I don't need this burden on Prots,which makes Prime,if that.
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
But should be the same, one to one. Here or mother to change, or BP, one of the two.
the minimum should be 11 volts, you have 12,1,
OMG what kind of nonsense is that??? if you don't understand why some nonsense to write from the category my books 100 sheets and your 200 but it should be 100 sheets or burn from excess. This is indicative of the nonsense that you wrote above.
11 volts at a minimum and IT is NORMAL in your opinion?????? What kind of raving delirium. This is just not normal. The ideal is smooth 12v at all loads, and all that is included in the 5% deviation is the NORM!!! i.e. from 11.4 to 12.6 and under load a bit higher and the indices in [Denis] everything is in order. SO, ENOUGH OF THIS BULLSHIT.