No future without a past...
I suggest to remember how it was. Send pics, photos, share your impressions about the past. We look at pictures of those years and of his see and remember...PS. Please do not translate the theme into political current events to avoid blockage of the themes of the administration!
Spoiler
And voting for amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation is a Foundation for the future.
Who voted against the past and live in the past, do not want change. Well, what about 77% voted FOR, although the turnout could be bigger. Two-thirds overall, not bad, but not great.
Sorry, that topic is closed 8) So the answer here...
The main discussion was the topic vote or do not vote.
Denis Kyokushin
And you scroll above.I already wrote about this
The question is removed, the vote was not only for, and against, I needed clarification.
So, none of the Russians there is no reason not to go to vote in principle, if the cause is not objective. Because you can go and say vs. It is necessary to vote for everyone, it's my belief, and doubt is not subject.
On, comrade.Here's my fantasies
And showed some fotozhabu with Putin. Lol )))
Vovochka even debate was not.Debates - show clowns.
1) And if Putin were there, you would be more serious about the debate?
2) why show of clowns? I have not read, but condemn? See pochama your position is WEAK ? You judge it without even reading, not looking, not listening. And there are quite normal people, explained his position as presidential candidate, no clown was not.
We are all someone else, its nothing.At the top of cattle with double and triple citizenship.But grimace portraying the patriots.
About all foreign nonsense (article on the achievements I cited, your attitude towards them is your problem), but about the pseudo-patriots with dual or triple citizenship, I agree.
I will say without Bulk
How do you know if you don't even know about the achievements of Russia and me(!), the foreigner who inquired about this? ))) Himself clowning bred. Then you judge about the problems of Russia on the issues in your hole where you live, you suddenly know everything about their country. Strange guy...
Watch the news? Federal. The transfer of political watching? If not, how do you know what you have going on outside of your usual route that you make daily in your particular town?...
K. I. L. L. J. O. Y
proishodit a coup on the Constitution, and to participate in the legitimacy of the regime and this circus just a shame!
Too much bombing ^_^
DrZoiberg
Fools always fall for the campaign to vote For
Said the fool that fell for the propaganda to vote against, lol ^_^
The trend will be? The trend of fighting against the government among youth of Russia is a little bit popular. Naive children... and well, if children. But if adults, it is deprived of intelligence...
здрастЕ28
offtopic for your country
that is the only thing keeping Russia from seizing any other territories of neighboring countries is the Treaty on friendship and cooperation with these potential victims brotherly love of the Russian people?
Even the agreement will not hold if you need to attack really. Formal treaties, they violate, or not waiting for a response from the UN security Council, for example. Well, as it was in South Ossetia in August 2008? The UN security Council was in turmoil, no solution was offered. Russia did it. Russia COULD take Tbilisi, but did not take. WHY? Because I don't. South Ossetia was rescued from vampires, that's enough, the goal is achieved.
Russia now, as you can see by this logic, it is even possible... and could even may 2014... take the Donbass. Yes, take it so that there is next to no Kiev military did not make a sound anymore. Thus, Putin could, in principle, to prevent a war 2014-2020. But he did not, for which, by the way, some of the Donbas, not liking it. For that, Yes, it ;] He decided... decided to wait, sometimes to feed the Donbass, but no more. Personally, I did not agree with my personal point of view, we must do what we need to do, guided by morality, justice, principles of good and evil. I don't have the brains to soar, trying to argue will not work. Specific examples, including the hypothetical, I can tell you or anyone else to explain everything. If anything, ask.
At other theses in your response to me on the topic of Crimea and Ukraine, I have heard many times the answers from the experts in the gear for several years, YOU're just repeating what they say Kiev experts, and that's all. The answers given long ago at all that you use as arguments against the capture of the Crimea by Russia, and so on. And about people, and about the legitimacy of the government of Kiev, about the acceptance or rejection of people's republics, or the recognition of the new President of Ukraine, the scandal with the tanker in the Kerch bridge and so on, all details were discussed, so I see no point in repeating it. In addition, your position comes from the Kievka point of view, and that is why it makes no sense to discuss ^_^
For when they speak different languages, with different notions about truth and justice, to talk about, just stupid about. Kyiv expert Gordey in the Studio Solovyov visual images demonstrates the uporotyh Kyiv point of view: head-on the question, the answer is no, the flowing water...
Then about a NATO base. The Constitution of Ukraine many times were changed, was correct, so I see no obstacles to a NATO base there to allow or cancel the ban. In addition, the BASE may be Ukrainian, now pay attention: but there may have NATO members. On the Ukrainian base. VOILA. Ban bypassed. When necessary, the Ukrainians can be very tricky.
build American, and the base will be Ukrainian.
Formally, 8) And located there can be anyone at the invitation of the Ukrainians.
Nevoeiro
NATO promised not to move East in words, so here claims only to those who believe in the word.
Promised the men? Fulfilled the promise kept? No. So, not a man ;] Apparently, really believed that there are normal men are sitting. And no mistake...
Masha
Ask Stalin, as he would have done. What's not clear?
Now it is clear. Well, what can wisely respond to you people of 70 years ago that lived in the realities of the time? He can answer about what and how to do nowadays, given the realities of our time? Ask Stalin... well, well. In this sense is simply not. Still say, ask Lenin or Ivan the terrible )))
Well, Yes, like he said, it is about speculation. You are an expert in Stalin's time, what order to build theory in the style of WHAT IF ?...
jigadloff
The observers movement the Voice took poignant movie about the gross violations at the polling station in Zhukovsky, gathered his simple belongings and went to fix the violations in the 20 parks and squares, specified in the order of the state Department on today.
Voice - for fair elections!
The whole point liberalnych exposure of election fraud, in one clip! All the precepts of uncle Goebbels, hamster, are not reflective spread.
Yes ,feykometchiki awake. These enemies of the people removed thousands of videos of disorders, but in fact fakes. The vote went fine, as it should.
Report voice of the violations was drawn up long before the beginning of voting, by the way 8)
A. Soldier of Light
Found where to reply))))
A. Soldier of Light wrote:the Question is removed, the vote was not only for, and against, I needed clarification.
And if I don't want to go?
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And showed some fotozhabu with Putin. Lol )))
Neponimau about your religion, I know)))
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
1) And if Putin were there, you would be more serious about the debate?
They do not need
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
2) why show of clowns? I have not read, but condemn?
Video on YouTube is, take it and see.Because this show zhlya vyser from politicians on each other.And what makes you think that I am this show is not watched?
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
About all foreign brad
Cucumbers from uncle Vanya production of India.And so in all.Juices take, they do Chinese and jelly like yogurt.
►On the issue of the tents for a vote as they are called. Apparently, the critics have forgotten that in the UK the vote on Brexit was held too, including in tents. Is this a problem? Don't see a problem. Where necessary, there are tents set, main, organization, and monitoring.
And here it feykometchiki in Russia epic merged ^_^ I Saw a movie about how supposedly the tent is, the ballot box is close, no one supposedly does not protect anyone? So... the plot of this production from beginning to end. From the tents to the operator and the witness, which interview.
All the money Western NGOs. Corrupt young people without conscience and honor. Well, not all are.
Then, like you idea for the Russians to go to vote against!, to get a answer against, pay $ 200 at the U.S. Embassy and hope for a green card? ^_^ Never heard of this? And is there. But I'm afraid it's just a Scam to l city.
even the tent golosovaniem England and the United States )
Denis Kyokushin
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
And if I don't want to go?
1) You know that technically you have a right not to go and not to go on elections or voting is not punishable by law. But informal is different, but here are the options when make.
OK, you made. Question: Putin is guilty in this?
2) And second question: why not go and vote if there is possible to put against? Never understood those who do not go to the polls. We in Estonia also has elections, although the parliamentary Republic, the President for the species and international travel, all the power of the parties, and here for the party (individual candidates), for the mayors we have the vote. Yes, even for the mayor of the city, but it is the capital. Don't know how in other cities the mayor is chosen.
A. Soldier of Light
On, comrade, look:
)))) 
Now tell me, is there any difference between FOR and NO, if you will still be FOR???
PS.: the Constitution, as amended in the form of booklet was printed in March, so that the vote is a show too, and in any case would be FOR.So rest with your pseudoelements in the form of maybe, but may not be, and is, as I wrote.
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
Now tell me, is there any difference between FOR and NO, if you will still be FOR???
What's the meaning of the question? If we have two events and one is more likely due to certain factors, it is logical to expect that more likely to happen than less likely.
Factor, for example, support for Putin by the Russian people, rating. In March 2018, remember? Nothing strange that the probability of his victory was evident.
Now, about the predetermination: this is nonsense. But if you insist that an election or a vote decide nothing, so you know that you have already made a choice (the government did), and your vote changes nothing, it doesn't. This thesis. YOUR thesis, you fucking critics )) argument would have to prove, PLEASE. Or fused.
Otherwise we just picture when there are a number of individuals that WHINE because, see, what a mess, lol, one of the options is more likely due to certain factors. Whining the argument is not. And here is the proof that the elections do not change anything and do not decide, it would be an argument. But it is not.
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
the Constitution, as amended in the form of booklet was printed in March
Due to the lack of accurate data (not to worry, you have them, too), here's the answer:
The case when the positive decision was logical due to the support of Putin by the Russian people, and, as a consequence, its decisions, including the Constitution. So in advance knowing about the high probability of support for the people of the Russian Federation amendments, released book. And because this owner allowed you to see how it will look in the text of the Constitution after the changes, and that's all.
Kyokushin Denis wrote:
pseudoelements in the form of maybe
Hmm, weak base your argument, comrade. Logic is not enough.
It was just necessary to vote on each item separately. Or either for all "yes" or for all "no." And if a person disagrees with some points.
Past? The past is gone.
Every moment, like a lit match, inexorably tends to zero.
We don't take off from the bottom and finish at the top. We fly up to the echelon and sooner or later return to the ground.
Autumn begins.
The past burdens and sometimes deprives of any desire to strive for a better future.