1366x768 or 1920x1080
Always played with permissions 1366x768, is it worth to buy a new monitor for 1080p? the difference in graphics is very different?there is such garbage. But he reflects the old matrix
See Samsung, Philips technology and build off of them.
http://www.gamepark.ru/playstation3/accessories/playstation_3d_display/
KaZzuiR
Wasn't sure at the time. When bought - everything fell into place, detailing to a whole new level. The difference between HD and FHD is more noticeable than the minimum settings and ultra, in almost any game.
warp 37
well that goes) but the picture is improving. If good components, why not
Metalist1925, what can I say, I'm not particularly concerned about components. He climbed from 1680x1050 to 1366x768 in the year before that was the GTX 670. In 2016 I bought a GTX 1060 and continue to sit on 1366x768, because it is profitable.
KaZzuiR wrote:
Always played with permissions 1366x768, is it worth to buy a new monitor for 1080p? the difference in graphics is very different?
FullHD of course,the difference will immediately notice,even less is not worth taking.
warp 37 wrote:
In 2016 I bought a GTX 1060 and continue to sit on 1366x768, because it is profitable.
Spoiler
800x600 is still profitable.
warp 37 wrote:
4:3 is 1024x768.
You as such need then take,benefits in General the whole car.
Sitting on 768.... grief do not know)))) always 60+ and 100+ fps))) the difference will see only with the normal matrix and the color...
There are also JEM ... you can at least 4K to put..
KaZzuiR wrote:
1366x768, is it worth to buy a new monitor for 1080p? the difference in graphics is very different?
Graphics from HDReady FullHD does not differ. FullHD is a full-screen HD, and just.
But unlike grafone on various matrices, immediately catches the eye. For example, TFT or TN compared to IPS.
Stupid question. Of course steeper than 1920x1080 for gaming, if the computer will draw Yes.
A sense obsolete FullHD to take? 1440 minimum, and ideally 4K. And then according to the logic economists possible and on 1280-1024 to sit in 2к17, it's profitable! IMHO, should be ashamed to play in 768p resolution 2к17, even console gamers play in 900p.
Razox
And what,exactly,shame?Personally I'm in all online games where the result is important to play only the old monitor with 1280x1024 resolution.Personally, I stupidly uncomfortable to play in Heroes of the storm or in the same CoD in 1440p as the quality of the game (that is my personal ability) drops significantly.At the same time as I hadn't tried to show at least half the same result as on the monitor,I can't do this,although singulie games,for example,RotTR or AC:Syndicate quite comfortably played on a TV with a resolution of 2560×1440.
warp 37
you're a known pervert in all aspects including resolution, so the better your advice don't let no one...
KaZzuiR
well, of course already at Full HD and without any excuses!
Don't listen to the warp he is a wanker with his old videhoe on my laptop 1600x900 and even on a PC Monique 1920x1080, Full HD, very nice looking even not in games but for example when watching a movie