The transition from 1280x1024 FULL HD

First depends on some specific games,and from 20FPS and higher,and there are also tests in different resolutions.

what kind of video card?

Not a lot, more resolution is only half. For example, 4K resolution more than the usual 1080p 4 times and the performance drops about ~3 times. Unless the load on the memory will increase and if your vidyuhi she was tailgating on the old resolution on the new because this can be a strong friezes.

You Mat need to learn,mate.And even better local to your chudil Varpu to go,it's nice to know.
Seriously, the higher the resolution,the less frames you get.

the greater the extension the greater the load on the video card I have an old computer Processor: Intel Core i5-3570
Motherboard: GA-H77-DS3H
Memory: 16 GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 MHz
Graphics card - Palit GTX Super JetStream 1060
the ViewSonic VX2778-SMHD 2560x1440 60fps stable but not everywhere

ScariN
ScariN wrote:
2560x1440 60fps stable but not everywhere
So here also the concept of the graphics settings are important and it on low-medium course can still take out. For ultra and 30 on such resolution will be a joy :)

Ilya Nitsenko

What resolution are you playing?
The refresh rate is 60, 75, 85 Hz 2D enough ?

Example LG 27MP59G: AH-IPS on this 60герц

But I would take something with a stock 75 Hz or slightly higher that can be played with the update settings.
There are already 85 and 120 Hz

Spoiler

Spoiler


about the FPS, naturally the greater the resolution affects the number of frames.

MagicHero
I have almost everything on maximum twisting system is not weak just planning to replace the Intel Core i5-3570 Intel Core i7-3770 4 core 8 threaded or equivalent Intel Xeon e3-1280 V2, but the fps is unlikely to fly about 100 games but on this monitor is awesome in modern to play but in the old everything in sight what terrible graphics you can see all the pixels take the monitor can be 1920x1080 with 75 Hz or 144 for you to decide

ScariN
I wrote about the fact that in 1060 at 2560x1440 60 fps in games you can obtain at low-medium settings. On the ultra as the fps will be around 30. Change percents Intel Core i5-3570 Intel Core i7-3770 just a meaningless, waste of money. You fps at this resolution will not add, it all will depend on the graphics card. If the change (based on future, then change the graphics card) on the last 8th generation and take at least 8400 is better but the 8600(8700), but there's only one problem RAM price up just cosmically 16 gigs 2X8 good memories are now 15K, in General, just horror.

MagicHero
at low-medium don't see the point of memory and videopamela enough + more fps depends on the optimization of Fallout 4 60 fps go into the bushes and falls to the Singularity 55 of 170 fps to change the PERC plan for installation + additional threads will help to change kom will not be another 100 years it is still a very good all pulling knowingly his memory I added and I see no reason to change platformu old suit games fly and does not shrink to a new platform needs the money but alas no

Now with modern games it is dangerous to take 4k, for devouring game - Mama do not cry!!!! If pakaur want 60 fps at this resolution, one of the kidneys will not be enough for sale)
Peck peck!

ScariN
On the ultra (that's ultra settings and not the type of shade on high, the processing on medium, still the difference is almost invisible) at 2560x1440 30 fps in games like Crysis 3, The Witcher 3, The Division, Assassin's Creed Origins, Mass Effect, Andromeda, Ghost Recon Wildlands, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, Agents of Mayhem, Metro 2033 Redux. More already tired to write, as you can see games full. And in the case of the 1080-th for even 1080p is not always enough and you then write that on 1060-th to 2K hvatet to 60 fps.

STANDS of Milivoje
For 60 fps quite one stove is enough, but the processor preferably better. My load jumped from 10-20% at 1080p up to 60-80% in 4K, it is in the games support 4K and effects naturally. In the same fallout 4 is the load is not greatly increased of 5-10%.

MagicHero
enough look

+ I'm not a fps fag constantly not sitting with fps only when record everything you wrote can't check until enough games the Witcher at high settings 45 fps in the early 60 sometimes upiraetsya in processor and vidyahu but not much Witcher any vidyahu, put on my knees + I have not so much money that would take the gtx 1070 I'm not a rich kid like you

Gera95
and what percent?

wrote:StormX07
Playing on 1280x1024 resolution (square Monique)
Almost all novelties of the type PBGA 70-80фпс
Iron :
CPU : AMD FX-6300
GPU : GTX 1050ti
RAM : 8GB

conventionally, in times 2 is 2 and a half will drop fps. between 1600x1200 to 1080p is already increasing the load in times is mainly due to the use of steep-aliasing-peck peck

people check out my percent load almost gone sorry for bad quality phone

ScariN
I kind of brought up a list of games on 2K resolution and on ultra settings on 1060 will be around 30 fps (about any stable 60 there is no question)
ScariN wrote:
people check out my percent load almost gone sorry for bad quality phone
And what to check out then? Did you launch Far Cry primal which is not very demanding on the percent. PERC is outdated and much the same but the acceleration to 4.2 Hz for all kernels and it is already in some games is not enough for stable 60 fps. If you have a PERC without overclocking and running at 3.6 Hz as in the picture then all is even sadder.

MagicHero
I know what outdated is not necessary to omnicity esle he would have been with it I would overclock it but alas, my motherboard can only overclock turboboost + I don't have a stable 60 is enough for 50-40 fps I fps fag, I would not say that the game is not trebelno CPE operativki about 7 and about 4 of VideoMate and it is not sad, fly games

how do you not poymesh no money new to collect and I don't want esle just go to 4th generation processor, I only buy the processor and motherboard memory is