Impressions of the game (Red Dead Redemption 2)
After 3 days the release of this highly anticipated game. So please share your opinions, but without spoilers.DayPsycho
They're there, but you can't use their services. The reason why you can't-character GG. It would violate the logic of the game
Tennessee73
Thank you!!! I'll come for the day, but here's not Abigail's hunt to change)
All the aloha.
The game is undeniably liked, it is very deep, big, interesting, but:
1. Why the game for Arthur does not involve the whole REGION and get there is not possible (bugs do not count)??? The logic of the game is due to the fact that GG is wanted "Alive or Dead" in the region, but can not the same lawmen patrol all the trails and passages in the region, I thought, the answer - maybe, it's biorobots androids who do not sleep and do not eat, and the staff contains an army that is engaged in what just waits for GG, and all the few years that go the plot of Arthur, hello... I tried to pass through the northern path on a stealth and a few tens of meters, as the lawmen appeared on the map, almost immediately they noticed me, and then I was soaked by an INVISIBLE sniper... Why, rockstar, why?.... You can't get there for Arthur, and John is no longer interested, personally to me.
2. Epilogue for John - Complete failure, it would be more interesting to play for Abigail, Imho.
3. The way in which divided (another word to pick up) with Arthur is very upsetting, could add and a good ending, like he still went to Tahiti, Brazil, Europe, no matter how, along with his beloved and began a new life, which is why he did not care about the gang, all his junk, including the diary (so as not to burn) he left John. But the Rockies decided to follow the path of the writers of Game of Thrones, notoriously weak decision, as they are not Martin ...
In view of the above I cooled to the open world of this game, xz why, play online does not even pull, I know that there is like a plot brought, but to play a dumb idol, such a thing.
All Peace
Henry Ford
1. What is the actual failure of the epilogue? The game is already complete, it's just a small bridge that connects the rsdr2 and the rs1 among themselves, some weak claim. And what would be the interest of playing for Abigail? The story at some point primarily focuses on the relationship between Marston and Datch through the prism of Arthur's perception. So I don't understand the epilogue about Abigail.
2. What Brazil, what Tahiti, are you delusional? Arthur is terminally ill, what a family life, this is one of the most wanted bandits in the country, as he in such a state alone is going to run away from the government in other countries especially in such a difficult period for the life of a gang, he rat something? Or were the prerequisites for this in his behavior? That's the thing. There was a hard choice between his lover and his "family", he could not leave his people, their lives largely depended on him, Mary did not threaten anything. What kind of fuck did you do with the gang? When the cat was going on, did you pick up your nose, if you were looking at the goat that you took out of your nostrils? He could not just escape because the gang is his family, closer people Arthur can no longer be, he has a commitment to them, especially after the gang began a complete discord and was subsequently found a rat, he could not fail to bring the matter to the end. After the discovery of the disease Arthur himself comes to the conclusion that he personally has no chance to normal life will not be, so he tries to help realize this John tk sees in him the potential and bright soul, and he has a family and the guy he is not so stupid and unserious as he was presented in the first half of the game.
About the diary and the fact that the Rocky went down the path of the writers of Game of Thrones just a full wheel in the 3 paragraph painted. As a result, in his head crookedly interpreted the events that do not apply to the game and gave them an assessment, well done.
Henry Ford
Yes, not, not shaken, on the contrary I am glad that adequately respond to criticism. I'll argue that the DDR is rpg. That elements, it is some elements of rpg in the game are present to agree (what no pumping of the character and side quests with the continuation), but at the core it is a classic Rockstar narrative action in the open world, it is not rpg, the key here is that we do not play ourselves, we play for a particular character, with his system of values, outlook on life, philosophy with his personal history. Therefore, my opinion is that to scold the linear game for the fact that it is linear at least strange. I did not follow the statements of the developers that the choice of the player affects the ending, but in fact the ending can be chosen, the truth I admit that it is the same finale and the choices made by the player globally do not change anything, But here the case is different, to judge the game should not be on promises, and on what we have, if they did not meet your expectations about the branching of the plot as it is done in rpg and other mechanics that are acceptable for this genre are not made appropriately, then it is your expectations and no more, agree. The game as well as the first part, as well as the game series Gta is an action adventure, criticism of the existing script with its plot holes ok, but the criticism of the lack of choice in the notoriously linear game and history, such as himself.
P.S - about gta 5. That's the point that the ending you stupidly in the forehead choose at the end, there is no chain of quests and subsequent branches that led you to this finale, in the game in the course of passing there is no election and actions that would somehow affect globally on the ending, just near the end of the mission begins, you are put before the fact and provide a choice on one of the three endings and that's it. In Gta 4, too, there was a choice between two endings and what now? It is now a full-fledged rpg, of course no, it is absolutely linear games. Giving a choice of ending doesn't make a gunman rpg. And most importantly, you yourself recognized that the game itself positions itself as a game in the open world, but there is no sign of equality between rpg and games in the open world.
Joker_FI
I think I'll agree with everything you've written. I hope there will be a story dlc, about zombies for example, where we will finally be available the whole map entirely for Arthur)))
really liked Arthur's story, and after his death, John didn't really stick to play. remember the same twist in the first rdr. in fact, the main moral of the game is just the incurable disease of Arthur himself, the way it turned his life, and how he began to change his views on life. it touched me to the core for some reason. because it's like that, no one knows how much and to whom measured. and we're all not perfect. and often do not choose expressions in communication who with loved ones, who else with someone, someone nasty actions. and then hop, and everything that's valuable to us can disappear in an instant. I saw the moral that roughly speaking not need to change at the very "last" moment, you need to do it right now. and don't put something important in a long box.
and as if comparing if it can be done with gta 5, then gta, let's say trolling. in the game, they make fun of everything. brands, celebrities, clothes. And more... while The 2 is a serious story. I'll say that I really liked the GAME. to mechanics and realism of course there are questions. also tried to infiltrate Armadillo for Arthur. far from advanced. these lambs from the matrix of course spoiled the impression. And overall, everything is fine for me.
After all, after about 30 attempts to play this game I can say unequivocally - GOOD BEFORE THE WORLD!!!! At first it was boring, then I decided to overpower myself. Well, everyone says that the game is cool, you have to give it a chance! Gave... It's a waste of time. Constantly tried to sit down and start playing, but after 10-12 hours of gameplay everything became wildly monotonous and boring. Guns - there is no difference. You can run with one gun or rifle the whole game, still there is no special difference. The shooting is boring to the horror with this auto-guidance. I tried to turn it off - it is impossible to play. Shooter from the 3rd person with such a weapon and such a distance of shooting on the controller - a lot of pain. There is no sense to improve the camp, the plot for the sake of the plot. It is developing very, very slowly. Yes, the game is perfectly made from a technical point of view and the efforts of the authors. There are many useless dialogues during missions. At the level of Gta Weis City. I don't understand what the story is. In general, I could not bring myself to finish the game. Wildly boring
6 out of 10 no more
Vasily Vinokurov
It's just that the game isn't for everyone. And in terms of dialogues, it's two heads above the gta. After all, it is one thing to observe the aesthetics of the Wild West, and another - stupid giggling and endless petross on the topic of genitals to the fun of schoolchildren and concerned.
One regret is that the game did not make the opportunity to bury some of the dead. As an example you run into a closed house, and there are dead children, from the letter you learn that they were robbed by some rednecks, the mother left them supplies and
I went to deal with the redners. Then you bump into these rednecks, and you hear from the conversation that they just abused this woman and dug up later. It's a pity you can't bury these kids and my mother together. Or you meet the corpse of an old lady who died in the house waiting for her son, who fought with the Yankees.
Werewolf1986
I agree, the game is super, sat down to re-pass a second time for evil.
The game took me almost 3 weeks! That hasn't happened since the Witcher.
It's a great game. But not everyone will like it. Very slow and measured, filled with small details. There are so many pleasant aspects and the main thing is that this world looks as realistic as possible, from everything that I have seen in the open world until today) The scale is chic, the work is worthy, the generation of moments is worthy. In this open world can be really boring, but try by car to drive out of town (or even on a horse for authenticity), a lot of fun?, a lot of random events?))) But the game is almost as beautiful as in real life ... Against this background, very much like the emotional background of the plot, it looks decent and causes empathy!
And this "realist" will be the main drawback. For many, this game will be too slow, too full of conversations, slow everyday actions and other features of life. It takes a lot of time and if you're in a hurry, you won't get pleasure, but only irritation.
My personal, subjective score is 10/10! Arthur is a very well-prescribed hero, my deep respect, to all who engaged in this game!
Everything is very boring and very slow. And endless jumps is a snable: jumps from mission to mission, horse racing during the mission - some simulator jockey. The game more or less started to like after the middle, when there were fewer races and went to the mission of some pobodry. The plot is good, more interesting than the first part. Technically, everything is gorgeous and beautiful. The game is of course for the amateur and for those who have a lot of free time. I think a lot of people didn't finish it because of her tedium and slowness.
Oh, yes, I forgot to add about the shooting that it's disgusting. Rockstar still can not make a normal shooter mechanic on the gamepad and have to play with a full auto sight.
pechenkii
So you still have a choice of locomotive or stagecoach. And if you participate in horse racing, in the generated cases, you can pump horses health and endurance, it's plus to 4 levels of confidence.
Rolemanser
The stagecoach is not immediately opened and there is little use from it: it is closed to him and from it is still decent to gallop. The horse pumped towards the end of the game, because the bull was not passed (there was also a lack of this).
pechenkii
I pumped four horses, which is to the fact that I'm still in Chapter 4. Kstat a horse is not only transport and transportation of goods, watch her reaction, if in the woods or else where begins to worry, or a snake somewhere or a predator wants to attack, I so in the forest on a horse hunted cougar and bears.