vftor
These interferences arise from the jerks and freezes when moving in the game.
On the second hard record necessary
vftor
vftor wrote:
Yes nonsense. MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner Statistics Server gives the worst result in interference Time frame - I tested all the options.
Like you're just a chatterbox, and nothing close and not tested. I'm up to this from personal experience knew that plane was there is a constant frequency jump shots which was MicroProse and which I treated forced Locke to 60 fps. But then came an armchair expert, wrote nonsense, but still I'm sure that made some tests but the results did not show )))
Here are my tests. The first in the haven 4.0, first comes the plane, then the plane+60 lock, then only lock for 60
Spoiler
as you can see no difference at all, graphics are just a perfect match. But it is a bench which is created to show accurate performance in comparison.
Next I tested in the bench Rise of the Tomb Raider, everything is the same, first comes the plane, then the plane+60 lock, then only lock for 60
Spoiler
And then just jump microfreeze or time frame when forced to lock at 60 fps disappear (became considerably less), but you claimed to the contrary, our sofa expert, and then tested )))))
Lastly, did a test in Rise of the Tomb Raider on the minimum salary because that was tested for ultra Yes, even the anti-aliasing x2 and can download strong video card like that effect, although I download the 100% was not so everything was fine.
There have already ran 2 times with plane and Locke 60 fps.
Spoiler
And here still to Locke, everything is much better, almost perfect video.
So next time think and should I write lies and to introduce other users to the error.
MagicHero
These surges-pulses of curve drawing time frames shows the instability of this time from what there are jerks and freezes when moving in the game.
If the driver Radionovskiy, it is possible to set the maximum frame rate if you need a short video, it is better to use Fraps or bandika, the program itself just set the number of frames when recording as you need and all that while recording you will have 15-10-5 for your desire.
vftor wrote:
These surges-pulses of curve drawing time frames shows the instability of this time from what there are jerks and freezes when moving in the game.
And you have shown this??? just put one graph on it you understood everything, really??? case you are not a child???
I've already posted extensive evidence that the limiting loca at 60 fps through RivaTuner in MSI Afterburner gives the best result in relation to the time frame than just a plane. Although I knew that personal feelings in games but now convinced and practice.
MagicHero
You do not understand. And you have a lot of complacency.
1.I have the plane and the lock 60.
2.This schedule time frame or rather of the uneven time frame depends on many factors:
- optimization of the game.
- parameters of iron comp.
interference from the meter time frame, that is, the program (MSI Afterburner, EVGA Precision X, Bandicam). So, I was saying that EVGA Precision X makes less noise in the measurement than MSI Afterburner and Bandicam. That's all.
vftor
It all started with the fact that you wrote:
vftor wrote:
Yes nonsense. MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner Statistics Server gives the worst result in interference Time frame - I tested all the options.
It is clear that you do not tested and just blurted out, you even now when it is pressed too lazy to test.
I'll prove to practice that MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner Statistics Server at locked 60 fps on the contrary gives better result than without it. But you apparently can't read, well then as they say poke in the right place time try zero.
1st is no loca via MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner Statistics Server, 2nd is with Locke at 60 fps. And where do you think the time frame is better???
MagicHero
You th so difficult. Started with this - I wrote:
The best way to limit FPS is to use EVGA Precision X 4.2.1 in conjunction with RivaTuner Statistics Server 6.2. This program creates less clutter on Time frame than MSI Afterburner and Bandicam.
And then, when I wrote:
Yes nonsense. MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner Statistics Server gives the worst result in interference Time frame - I tested all the options.
I was referring to what was said earlier:
The best way to limit FPS is to use EVGA Precision X 4.2.1 in conjunction with RivaTuner Statistics Server 6.2. This program creates less clutter on Time frame than MSI Afterburner and Bandicam.
Next, I also said that Locke is better. And you say the same thing, but I think that I'm wrong.
Once you are not Ukrainian ? They are the same curve.
About my testing. When I tested all prog, then MSI Afterburner was removed, and left the best EVGA Precision X .
Do you think that for you I'll be there again to install ? I don't need it, so I wrote to you check it
In short, enough to plant an empty Bazaar. If you think that the MSI Afterburner better I believe and enjoy it. And I'm going to use EVGA Precision X.
vftor
vftor wrote:
The best way to limit FPS is to use EVGA Precision X 4.2.1 in conjunction with RivaTuner Statistics Server 6.2. This program creates less clutter on Time frame than MSI Afterburner and Bandicam.
Next, I also said that Locke is better. And you say the same thing, but I think that I'm wrong.
Do not understand you down or what? wrote nonsense at first, the evidence did not give and now write nonsense that MSI Afterburner effect on the frame time without Locke, I'm SORRY IT's LIKE?!?!?!?!
vftor wrote:
About my testing. When I tested all prog, then MSI Afterburner was removed, and left the best EVGA Precision X .
Where the results of the tests? Oh, you were testing out their fantasies and get them out did not work )))
vftor wrote:
Do you think that for you I'll be there again to install ? I don't need it, so I wrote to you check it
Standard children's excuse ))))))))))))
vftor wrote:
In short, enough to plant an empty Bazaar.
Empty plant only you and I have proved that MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner fps and Locke on the contrary reduce the jump time frame than without them. You have provided nothing except their imaginations and as a permanently pinned and merged )))))))))
the spray foam is released into the system unit will lower your fps but will also make your PC quieter by 115%
The topic is relevant for those who play the old games on a new PC. Fps in these games sometimes exceed over a hundred. But this is not a reason for joy. Because the game then flies literally. It is unlikely someone will like to play the rewind. This is in principle true for fans of 60 fps. If the game was made for 30 fps, then at 60 the animation is played too fast creating the effect of rewinding.