3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
D
DrealFox 19.04.20 08:47 pm

Lag on the computer, the appropriate minimum requirements. (Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands)

The problem is clear, the fps below 60 on a normal build:
GTX 1050 2gb
7400 I5 4 cores 4 threads 3.0 GHz
8 GB RAM DDR4
The Nvidia driver is the latest (385.69)
Windows 7 SP1 x64
The game goes below 60 fps on ultra low settings, although Splinter Cell Blacklist from Ubisoft at all the same shows 60 fps on ultrax, and FarCry 3 gives 40 and because of the grass off of her get 60 stable. Borderlands 2 on ultra 80-180 fps, DOOM on low-ultra 40-60 (removed decals and the quality of the shadows, even on ultra low is 80), Battlefield 4 on the map 64 players, textures ultra, effect ultra, view distance ultra, the resolution is 175% (going 60-80 in team fights, and team fights there ogogo).
So, WHY LAG the GAME? I UNDERSTAND THAT A LARGE MAP, BUT IN THE SAME FARKRAY IS STABLE 60 FRAMES THAT YOU HAVE FOR OPTIMIZATION, YUBIKI? EVEN ON A CURVED FROSTBITE BF4 IS JUST GREAT, WHAT THE HELL? AND FOR THAT, I GAVE 2000P. ????
p.s. Il minimum requirements 5-10 fps? The way it works?
21 Comments
Sort by:
M
Macros Easy 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur wrote:
THAT KIND OF NONSENSE? AND FOR THAT, I GAVE 2000P. ????
If you consider that you have a 2gb GTX 1050, you love to lose money in the trash.

D
Devilgroup87 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
It's a shame that 1080ti the game to work, too did not really want. On the ultra gives the approximate 40 fps.

D
DrealFox 19.04.20

Devilgroup87
Duck that's what I am! By the way forgot to say GTA5 was Perfectly stable at 60, the settings are not remember that is not ultra-low, average approximately. I understand that this is found favorite They who do not know how to optimize games, but why the minimum requirements are not minimal, and not real? Shaw nonsense, and even use 2K for log game type PUBG

D
DrealFox 19.04.20

Macros Easy
It's not about to say it, and your misplaced sarcasm I appreciated. Please do not offtopic.

i
i dnt think so 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
Ignat Sokur wrote:
although Splinter Cell Blacklist from Ubisoft at all the same shows 60 fps on ultrax, and FarCry 3 gives 40 and because of the grass off of her get 60 stable. Borderlands 2 on ultra 80-180 fps, DOOM on low-ultra 40-60 (removed decals and the quality of the shadows, even on ultra low is 80), Battlefield 4 on the map 64 players, textures ultra, effect ultra, view distance ultra, resolution 175%
What блeat sense to compare games CHERYAPINA AGO! FOUR YEARS, ALE! Let's compare Fallout 4 first. I WONDER WHERE YOU'LL HAVE MORE FPS?!

b
bazilews 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
Vidyuhi weak and is not enough memory.

W
Wolf347 19.04.20

Strangely, I have not noticed any lag and other problems in this game. But ARK is really a demanding game. In her mega huge resolutions not play much, what is not said about Ghost Recon: Wildlands

D
Devilgroup87 19.04.20

Another 1070 vidyuhi worth 16 operatives, and percent 7700, says that on medium-high 60+ fps it is stable. The graphics card is the game he loves. on 1080ti mail all 11 gigs of memory hawala, about the same operatives and the CPU under 60%.

W
Wolf347 19.04.20

In General, vidyahu change. Buy at least 1060 at the time. Or wait for Volta.

D
DrealFox 19.04.20

[Metal_Gear_Solid]K_I_R_I
I compared the graphics and optimization, if you're too stupid to understand this, I explained to you.

i
i dnt think so 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
I am more of an optimization? You game not lag, because they are made under the old graphics card generations. Can you give an example - Batman Arkham Kinght. All her reproached for the bad optimization, but if it is run on 1080ti 8gb, then assume it will not. Was, would not optimize - it lag. So we're only one - and it's not me.

D
DrealFox 19.04.20

[Metal_Gear_Solid]K_I_R_I
Then why is Ghosts graphics 2015 lag on graphics cards old generation, at that time, like other games in 2015, and graphics and output, are fine? My graphics card claims 10 generation, because this is it, new generation.

i
i dnt think so 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
Little Gigi graphics card for processing the world.

Q
Quantum89 19.04.20

I have GTX 780, 3 GB the game were given 35-70 fps at high settings with the included swash, extra lighting. In towns and large villages had dipped to 35. In the forests, fields and mountains flying until 70. Then changed midasko on GTX 1060. With the same settings in the cities was 40-45 and the area was rising to 90. Although if you believe the workload of video memory in the game itself - it takes 2700 gig from 6. Optima of course igruha so-so.

A
Alphalva 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur wrote:
the game is below 60 fps on ultra low settings
KPC... the subsection... met low, met ultra... ultra-low has not yet met

e
evil.burmistroff 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
Under min requirements mean hd resolution . and Yes 2 gig of video memory is not enough . know

K
Kryogen 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
I have 1080ti up to 40 frames in some moments sinking and you want to on 1050 flew lol

B
BasicWay 19.04.20

Ignat Sokur
You have normal fps for your GTX 2gb 1050 I have a gtx 1070 fps and an average of 50-60, and if you turn on vertical sync so even up to 30-40 drops =) if anyone knows why tell me.

P. S And just a change this is Windows 7 SP1 x64.

Kryogen
Look what you wrote 1080ti drops to 40 fps and I think for whom the game did.

s
susser 19.04.20

I have 2x GTX 660 4gb, FBS of 22.44 min - max 74,63 - average 63,47...

A
Amsterdamn76 19.04.20

How would the game from yubikov, memory need 12+GB, and 8 percent of production, but the 1050 is a normal game can, no matter what the above wrote.