War drivers: AMD vs Nvidia
Let's see how the performance had changed at AMD and Nvidia for the last 2 years.AMD
Spoiler
Nvidia
Spoiler
Share your opinion about test results.
Sanya 21
The main guarantee.
At a low temperature, too, do not serve long. Temperatures are generally not a guarantee of card service.
gennaz
Just to shreds torn, by as many as 2 frames, in 2 games out of 10. That's a gap in tatters. And 1660 is worse than 1070. Really zashkvar, zashkvar AMD. Where I used to be there and stayed.
-Zion-
In all games with dx 12 and Vulkan and even in AC Odyssey, where there was a serious advantage of Nvidia cards by about 10 phps, now with the release of Radeon Adrenaline 2020 full parity.
The author still spared 1660 and rrd 2 tested in dx 12 and then the difference of 4 fps in favor of rx 590, and on the Vulcan gap
there will be even more. Also pleases the metro exodus, where rx 590 pulls 1660!
Now about the prices.
590
Spoiler
1660
Spoiler
Especially since the 8GB vram and 256 tires are better and more promising than the 6GB and 192 tires.
No wonder the rx 590 has 1660 in full!
Sanya 21
I have a maximum of 580 and only in games up to 74 degrees.
Spoiler
In a mere 30 degrees.
-Zion-
GTX 1070 310 euros (at the moment in retail "if you are lucky", already silent who should be and how to be friends with the head)
as opposed to RX 590 - 170 euros/ 1660 about 210
New 5500HT replacement 590 and the price will be similar
Alexander Kozlov
really weird comparison
With GTX 1070, the same can cope with vega 56 at the same time also cheaper, and at the price is already much nicer and
5700)
zhekazloy
zhekazloy wrote:
GTX 1070 310 euros
And the price, I'm saying 590 was worse than 1070 in her time, and she stayed, because 1660 is worse than 1070. I don't know why the author decided that 1660 is a power. So will be worn now with its RDR 2 look rips to shreds, the difference is three phps.
I won't deny that AMD has tightened up its species.
gennaz
gennaz wrote:
Now about the prices.
Almost alone, it's worth it to sit and wait for once again the radik dragged into the DX12, there's Jedi Fallen came out, and immediately the radik can not. Yes, 235 will be radion, and 120v 1660. If you want to buy a burning stove, please.
There's a difference of 3 pennies, and in most igors 1660 is still faster, dig up 2 games and carry with them as evidence, well, it's like yourself.
I'd understand if you said the 5700XT was much more profitable than 2060, that's where I'd understand, because there's already a big difference. But 1660 and 590? For real.
gennaz wrote:
I've got 580.
I would have written that right away.
gennaz wrote:
There was bad news for Nvidia cardholders.
Don't you read any more headlines? This is for DCH drivers who are like a be integrated into the wind, so so. For regular standard drivers, this is not necessary.
You're so s trying, it's funny. Did someone say that you were here before you squealed?
-Zion-
Won Jedi Fallen came out
A really good example, proving that nvidia cards can only bypass AMD cards in dead dx 11!))
Well, yes, 235v radion
I haven't seen more than 150.
I'm saying 590 was worse than 1070
It has a price to do with it.
So there's a direct link!
I bought 1050 because it was cheaper than 570 and went flat, later 570 tore all and all. sold 1050 for 2000gn. wanted to buy 580 but they after mining killed, had to take 1066. Added just 1,000gn. and got a prop, bu video cards better than the nvid, but would take a new bought from amd. until 1066 suits in all at full hee on medium, high
Recently switched from amd to nvidia. I will say that everyone has its pros and cons. At amd I liked the work with the image, a lot of all sorts of settings, and everything is clear. But no matter how hard I was, I couldn't make a fps. Load on the chip, temperature and tp showed, and where the phps - an empty line. There is no analogue of shadow play built-in.
Nvidia picked up because the price-performance is better. Require less power, and takes up less space in the system. But now there are some chips in the image setting up. Maybe they are, but they are hidden somewhere...
gennaz
There's no way around the control in dx12. It's probably not the same game. It always will be like this, I danced to wait.
Tdp claimed for 590, 235v. For your 185.
Buy instead of a cold non-eating graphics card outdated radion which consumes twice as high and warms, well it is so so. Especially for the sake of an imaginary increase in a couple of games, and draining in the majority.
5500xt is also shit.
The only decent graphics card is the 5700XT.
By the way my 2080ti basks like yours to 74. It's a bit much for the average species.
Maybe videochips at amd and good, but the drivers as were... Oh, and remained, it's personally my opinion,because there is experience of using long time amd vidyhi and nvidia.
Why exactly the driver at amd g... but compared to the nvidia?
The worst thing is, some games stupidly did not run on the amd vidyous or launch and black screen, there are various problems and tweed, but the nvidia if supported, then run all the games that are, and with the amd such will not ride, like support is, and figs run.
tatunserg
But no matter how hard I was, I couldn't make a fps. Load on the chip, temperature and tp showed, and where the phps - an empty line. There is no analogue of shadow play built-in.
Is that a joke, and my video is a little higher than I was capturing the video? Relive ! Yes performance indicators are all in place! Here's another example.
Spoiler
gennaz
180w in RX590 as the indicators are taken only with the GPU without memory, etc.