War drivers: AMD vs Nvidia
Let's see how the performance had changed at AMD and Nvidia for the last 2 years.AMD
Spoiler
Nvidia
Spoiler
Share your opinion about test results.
asbarton
Judging by your last comment, there is no one to believe, not people not technoblochers like Game Van not corporations, who want from consumers only money, so our dispute is stupidly useless, and will be right who bought iron suits completely, some for example does not suit RTX 2080Ti, and some and old GTX 670 suits, so everyone sees the world differently!
Bartalbi27
Yes in ancient games, but starting with gta5 4 nuclear i5 choked, I keep silent about streaming or recording games
Was the percent i5-2400 and i5-3300 it's just a year fx8300 and where are they now ? all merged, and on YouTube bespectacled that the i3 is even better than fx 8300 I agree in ancient games like rim total var and its ilk, where used a maximum of 2 cores that yes fx there merged, but in new projects even now sit familiar fx8320 q 1060 (rx 580) and play Even in 2019 and do not complain
Acceleration brutal is not necessary just to the level of 8350 frequency to adjust and enough, and I do not know how to drive will be i5 without an unlocked multiplier? On the bus? yes they're boiling water
If intel then not lower than the i7 take or with alik xeon , but the i5 of those series is now already delirious
Bartalbi27
That's right, just you refer to the tests, and I tested myself and again I'm not a fan of amd, the percentage is generally worth xeon 1230v2 and many will say oh pancake xeon , but it's a complete analogue i7-3770 only without seeing HD
That's who's old now that it makes sense to replace the i7 or xeon and not be afraid of aliepress
Bartalbi27
Here's the rdr2 test on high settings and no pods or friezes all clearly plays
Lodurr
What drawdowns? There are no drawdowns at all! dude the same test did on 1070 the same thing, it's lag the test itself, there's generally no below 50.
Here's to you and chavo!
Lodurr
Is that weird? tomorrow is still from 2060 skin and will be the same minimum phps the same ! I'm telling you there's no drawdown, the test itself is a bit of a bit of a bit and that's all the players have noticed.
Lodurr
What fake? If during the game everything is clear and below the average test fps does not fall, to me a friend with 1070 immediately told not to pay attention to the minimum indicator in the test, and he plays in the first day of the game and in the game all smoothly jumps and in the plot and online, do not argue the test may not be finished, but the phps in the game itself is excellent! In 19 hours of play, believe me, I'd notice such huge drawdowns if there were
First on the subju:
As I noticed, in the nVidia tests, the final summary of Average FPS was slightly higher or the same almost everywhere except for one game like that. So what's the claim?
In addition, it is worth noting that in addition to the versions of drivers, there are still different versions of the game, and for the correct comparison you need to compare the old version of the driver in a good way with the old version of the game, relevant at that time. Developers also make changes to the engine and optimization with patches, and not always successful.
On the perennial irons:
Always amazed by people who suck boiling water in topics that are better than Intel or AMD? nVidia or AMD? One simple question for all parties: is it better FOR WHAT? Better WHAT? That's real. Comp, you need to work, just to post, to post unpreservedly on ultra-structuring? Then the question: on what budget (minimum, srdene or ready to pay for top iron)? Different points of view will have a different truth. What iron you like, suitable for your tasks and what is enough money, and take everything else - empty worthless demagoguery. It's not the amddrops or the Nvidirochers, but the FPS. Poke each other's banchmarks, where far beyond 60 FPS results and shit when one see-off showed 3 FPS more than another, now say one twist, and the second shit - you're a sneer or who has more FPS? Have you lost your mind? )))WHY is it all? )))
Own example:
He used to be an ardent supporter of Intel. There was an old computer on Intel Core i7, bought back in 2011. For work is not good at all - iron is very outdated, junk. On my budget was a choice between Core i5 (6 cores/6 streams, last or penultimate generation, no longer remember) and Ryzen 5 (6 cores/12 streams, 3rd generation, 7nm). Weighing all the pros and cons (personally MY!) took AMD and happy absolutely, for my personal needs for today is enough. And I will take THE RTX 2070S, and for the work of CUDA and for a comfortable sewing personally I will have enough. And everything works perfectly and will work - all companies are interested to buy, and the srachs only maintain interest. Tomorrow will come out something cool from AMD, so sell my own and buy a new one, the problem? )
asbarton
And can a 4-core processor be just as good at lugging processor-dependent games such as Asassin Creed Odyssey, such as the Risen 5 1600, with its 12 streams?
The game
My 290x is already the seventh year lives, I'm in shock and quite 1080 still pulls everything...
coolmi
I have no doubt, the map is quite very! Again, AMDs make products for people!!! And not for profit just, yes maybe the top solutions and not, but most then buy medium solutions and Tut amd gives the heat green, where are these testers who shouted fucking 1060 bends 580? already advertise the snare 1650 super and 1650 type here's 1060 is no longer that, and these are better
The herd has been eating shit and continues to eat
asbarton
Well, you're already very conservative.
If you look from the point bought and forgotten, then yes amd, it's good. And if you change the graphics card every 2 years, the choice will fall on Nvidia.
I personally had both amd and nvidia.
I didn't see any difference between the cards.
I remember buying hd 7950 in 12 for 3 giga, that's when there was power. However, in 15 years fell off the gpu, and I decided to try to buy a quid, the choice fell on 970, about the memory I did not know that 3.5 giga. But it didn't bother me anywhere. Physicist praised worked only in a couple of games. Then two years later the choice fell on 1080, just before the mining boom, even then vega 64 cost sky-high money. Well, in 19, took 2080ti. If the amd rolls out something steeper than 2080ti percent so at 30, I'll buy amd again.
Asbarton wrote:
Here amd gives the heat green
What heat? The green market is 70% of the market. )))))
I assume that after the upgrade of the drivers of Nvidia brought not only optimization, but also edits with the graphic part, which turned out so: 1. Added fraps; 2. Lowered fraps by adding more graphonia
I can be wrong, don't hit hard.
On the dispute between Nvidia and amd I will add
I'd rather pay 10k, but I'll have a sane product.
That's what I say as a beggar who has 1k a month
Lodurr wrote:
That's out of the way - I've got enough, right? )))
But I miss, I want to see a modern graphone, not soap 8 years ago, and even spend on it 70 thousand.
So that's the thing that many enough - a million times saw people spire with the settings of graphene by default (both downloaded, and good)! In the end, it all comes down to either a production necessity (performance should be at least some threshold) or personal preferences.
Asbarton wrote:
Again, AMDs make products for people!!! Not for profit.
Come on, it's a business, so everything is done for profit, always. The only difference is on what segment of the market the company is oriented and in marketing policy.
SpeedLan wrote:
On the dispute between Nvidia and amd I will add
I'd rather pay 10k, but I'll have a sane product.
That's quite a certain opinion of the adherent of a certain manufacturer, and many will say "What is I will overpay 10k, if you can properly adjust graphene and will be almost ojzh and the same" and everyone will be right)
It would be very interesting to arrange a blind test: 15-20 computers with different iron Intel-AMD-nVidia in different combinations and that citizens do not know where what was sent, and then specify what they think the machine on what is collected. 100500% that the results of many will plunge into the wildest shock))) That would be interesting and revealing kk actually things)