War drivers: AMD vs Nvidia
Let's see how the performance had changed at AMD and Nvidia for the last 2 years.AMD
Spoiler
Nvidia
Spoiler
Share your opinion about test results.
Alexander Kozlov
And if on the topic of this branch, for 2 years the driver at AMD on old graphics cards have become better. And the RX580 bypasses GTX1066 in dx12 and vulkan in many games. Do you agree with these facts? If you don't like to twist them? After all, the theme is about the driver and the support of video cards. Agree, because GeForce 10 series do not grind the way AMD does with its old cards?
RX5700XT is cheaper than RTX2070Super, the facts please do not twist.
Single-crystal system from AMD, with RDNA 2.0 technology. Does that make a difference? Not GeForce is the main thing. Isn't there a twisting of the facts, like there's not AMAD details?
Why would I want to prove something to me, I saw the difference myself, and that's enough for me. I do not know how other people see and distinguish colors, maybe they do not really notice. Or if you are not visible, it means that everything should be so and who does not agree with you, immediately the facts twist. With frequencies yes, I agree, there is no principled topic and nvidia and without msi knows. But amd is still more convenient and does not need third-party progs to disperse.
asbarton
It's now rx470-590 good. When they came out started the mining boom, these cards were not available at all. And if you get where, 580 cost as 1080. Now without controversy, rx 570 top for their money, especially against the background of 1050ti and 1060. He took 570 nitro for his wife. But it is not necessary to write here that the colors are better or that the nvidia does not know how to work with frequencies. Here will roll out amd top card which gives nvidia, I buy. But so far 2080ti amd is not on the teeth in any game.
Kanych
I've already written about amd and the mining boom, and you agree with that? That amd cards were in short supply, that people had no choice what to take.
Kanych
What's the answer? You didn't give a go, not about the frequencies, or about the color transmission. Yes now 580 surpasses 1066, but only in projects with a volcano.
Kanych wrote:
And the RX580 bypasses GTX1066 in dx12 and vulkan in many games.
Nephew a year and a half ago took 1050 ti, and all this time it was blown off just in front of the eyes, now literally turned into a pumpkin. Spat, took the RX 470, so it blows twice as fast as its 1050ti, while for a penny. I'm with the greens in shock, frankly, the bottom segment they have - dust in the eye.
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
Intel n-Video and gigabyte
What, I'm sorry?
Lodurr wrote:
All others exist purely for the purpose of complying with antitrust laws.
What, I'm sorry? x2
It's funny when a manufacturer that exists only to comply with antitrust laws gives a cigarette and makes the main players move their buns, right?
Alexander Kozlov
Alexander Kozlov wrote:
Yes now 580 surpasses 1066, but only in projects with a volcano.
Well, how can I tell you...
Spoiler
The game has the only API - Dx12.
Kanych
Isn't this the wind one itself?
No, it's in the nvidia control panel:
Spoiler 
To you mixed up with the "nutrition" option in the windows control panel.
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
Well, do you doubt that? )
There's no doubt about what's not there.
Lodurr wrote:
Esus has always been a budget firm
Lol, no.
Lodurr wrote:
Where's the price of 200th, can you tell me?
A professional monitor on z-Dots. Indeed, mmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Lodurr wrote:
Your downsides prove otherwise
You're just talking nonsense, hence the natural downsides. No contradictions.
K1600 GT
K1600 GT wrote:
I personally never put a driver on a card that's in the first slot, as the Rockets themselves set everything they need for a 60fps performance at 4k
Is this a parade of freaks?
legusor
It's a pity that apart from the slag you can not squeeze anything out of yourself ...
Nvidia doesn't really have a difference, just a margin of error. That is, Nvidia already then had a good driver and they squeezed out of the iron all, and maybe did not squeeze, we do not know. And AMD improved the result, because not everyone has survived from their graphics cards before. Therefore, the comparison is incorrect, different architectures and initial optimization.
K1600 GT
How, you've got your own channel! Guys, we've got a herring in a trad, control your orgasms!
Lodurr
Lodurr wrote:
And now the most important question is, what is his matrix, type, serial number, who is the manufacturer? good luck in the search.
The target audience is interested in the characteristics of color capture, not serial numbers and the day of conception of the packer. God, why do I explain this...
Lodurr wrote:
Of course, you should argue only with those who understand your schizophrenic nonsense, and in every way support.
You're better at humor than you do in iron. Definitely)
Lodurr wrote:
And the reality is quite different. )
It's scary to imagine that reality in your head.
Alexander Kozlov
I'm trying to figure out what the circus is in these people's heads.
legusor
perhaps, not only beggars buy AMD, do not cut from the shoulder, maybe some just do not have any choice, in the wilderness, in villages and villages, that brought to the counter, and grab, in China to order not everyone dares, still prepaying unknown to whom, and with our mail, where stealing everything that is bad.
The game
Yes there is nothing to understand, one liar, such a trick with fps in 4k and I repeated, the second ssd that hdd, use only in fallout 4.
P.s trick with fps.
Spoiler
Kanych
If there is a disk version of Pure Sky, run on Radeon in the DX10 and at least with x2 smoothing. The GOG version starts without problems, but there is a lock on 60FPS.
K1600 GT
K1600 GT wrote:
You didn't know??? Here these balabols of darkness divorced, who think that for 4k need computers for tens of thousands of dollars))))))))) do not know how to really collect iron, and then complain that the same Fallaut they brake on the card for thousands of dollars)))
Locky, what do you write to yourself?