War drivers: AMD vs Nvidia
Let's see how the performance had changed at AMD and Nvidia for the last 2 years.AMD
Spoiler
Nvidia
Spoiler
Share your opinion about test results.
Continuation of the theme.
AMD continues to widen the gap from the nvidia in driver performance.
Amd
Spoiler
Nvidia
Spoiler
consumer graphics cards from amd as were always and without exception shit, so they remain. the same with their squalid drivers. I don't have to make a video - I've been using this shit's consumer products for ten years. If there is no money for a normal iron (intel'nvidia) or just stupid in youth - be content with AMD.
I take this opportunity to say hello to everyone, who is from the sect of fanatic drivers and sits with nvidia 399.24, because there is NIPAREZAL.
legusor
And the fat from the monitor is flowing.
I say hello to those who bought 1050ti instead of rx 570.
I say hello to all those who bought the extreme generations of Nwidia and AMD.
AMD 5700 and 5700HT are transitional video cards. A significant boost is expected in the next generation (RDNA 2.0), with the expected graphics cards from AMD expected to be no worse than Nvidia's counterparts in terms of heat and electricity consumption.
It is estimated that the performance of graphics cards will increase by 10-15% from AMD.
Navidia has the first generation of RTX, as well as the 16th - as in fact, are the transitional generation. The next generation will be much better, and perhaps the actual bust will be up to 25%.
And in the competitive environment between AMD and Nwidia, the expected prices will be even more pleasant than those currently available on AMD and 16th from Nwdia.
legusor
Old drivers can't sit permanently because the Vulkan, DX 12 API libraries are being updated. And even those games that were previously launched will stop doing so.
About driver problems at AMD, it's all in the past. Now Radeon software is much superior in functionality analogue from nvidia.
P.S. sitting on the old version of the driver is masochism. And if Nvidia ceases to support certain generations of video cards, then why use their products?!
He's been on the amd for three years, and the last one and a half on the nvidia.
Say what you want, but working with a graphics card at the amd is a million times better. You want to lock up the fps - in the driver, you want to disperse the map - in the driver.
Whereas for the nvidia it is necessary to swing a third-party for this
After first selling the GTX 1066 later and GTX 1070, he was puzzled by the purchase of new graphics cards. Because RX5700 and RTX 20XX buy this occupation. I'll tell you why, RX5XXX excellent graphics cards, but without rays, that is pruning. RTX's don't work well with low-level api dx12 and vulkan and the 14nm chip is obsolete. Neither AMD nor Nvidia showed their main solutions. The amd has cards with rdn 2.0 beams, and at the green it is 7 nanometer graphics cards amp. And why buy the current transitions, which came out so warmed up, before the release of the main graphics cards on both sides. The real battle of the graphics cards will be in the next beat of the graphics cards. That's why I took and bought on the used market RX580 8GB for 6500 rubles. Excellent works with dx12 and vulkan, not that the tenth series of green. At least RDR2 can be easily driven. As real practice shows, AMD has better driver performance and low-level api performance. The next graphics card will be taken from AMD, if the performance with the green q - will be the same. Let's see what Nvidia will release, and whether they will teach their graphics cards to work with dx12 and vulkan as amd-shn. The tracing will dictate the console, and the iron there from the amd, so optimization on any will be better in red. Also, the amd develops the picture of output, all sorts of technologies making the picture clear. Nvidia so far does not offer anything like this, except where the cores and work in the direction of working machines for work. All titans and other non-gaming graphics cards. AMD over the last 2-3 years have been very successful in iron, at this rate they can overstep all competitors. What I noticed on the AMD graphics card is less lags of all sorts, like the disappearing shadows and shimmering textures that GeForce has. The black color here on the AMD graphics card is deeper and blacker. And the colors are juicier a little bit. Driver is much more convenient, do not need all sorts of msi autoberners, drivers themselves are able to work with frequencies as well as third-party programs. Automatic frequencies adjust to graphics settings. You put the smoothing of the middle, the frequencies are reduced, the high smoothing accordingly frequencies on the maximum and the revs of coolers slightly rise. msi prog too understates the frequencies, for example instead of 1250, with msi 1090 frequency, without it 1250, increase the settings frequency already 1360 on rx580. And phps without msi more for a few frames. In all games coolers work at 60% and temperatures in the area of 61-65 degrees. And everyone deals with their own amd drivers. There, along with graphic drivers, another utility is installed that works with frequencies and auto-gon.
Kanych
I'm certainly not a nvid jerk, but it's not worth twisting the facts.
Kanych wrote:
chip 14nm
12
Kanych wrote:
RTX's don't work well with low-level api dx12 and vulkan
Well, how did you get it? Can your rdr 2, 2080ti lag behind Radeon VII?
Or 2080 from Radeon VII?
Kanych wrote:
The black color here on the AMD graphics card is deeper and blacker. And the colors are juicier a little bit
This in the driver you need to put full color coverage on the old monitors, the amd is the default.
Kanych wrote:
drivers themselves are able to work with frequencies as well as third-party
Well, yes, nvidia can't handle the frequencies. Really.
Kanych wrote:
In all games coolers work at 60% and temperatures in the area of 61-65 degrees. And everyone is engaged in their amd drivers
That's what cooling I've bought.
Best of all AMD but also nvidia is not worse every year that something new but also AMD does not lag behind
Alexander Kozlov
Take a look at the RDR2 performance tests. AMD solutions have shown themselves very profitable against the background of forces. In particular, middle and old people.
The game
I'm aware of this case.
But 2080 and 2080ti are in the lead, so even in the game against the Reds, the Reds lost.
Alexander Kozlov
Of course, they are in the leaders, because they have taken the snoring, pure power, and in the camp of red top-solutions there are no. But in the same volcano on the ultras even 5700XT breathes in the back of expensive flagships of the green.
Alexander Kozlov
12-nm is still not 7-nm. Banal mixed with the 10th series, it does not cancel the fact that the chips are outdated.
And you look at the tests RX5700XT vs RTX 2060Super, who is more productive in dx12 and vulkan. The RX5700 is priced by a competitor to it, not the RTX 2080 or RTX2080ti. Radeon VII is kind of on the old GCN architecture, not RDNA. AMD has not yet shown its top map on the new architectures.
I always use nvidia graphics cards and have never been a fan of amd, this is my first experience. Drivers from nvidia do not know how to work with frequencies, enough to lie:) There you need to use third-party software such as msi avterberner. You can change frequencies to the amd and manually. (on nvidia drivers personally I did not find work with frequencies, may not have seen?)
As for the pictures and colors, personally I was not able to get such colors on the video card from Nvidia on the same monitor. Even though he moved everything there and did it in his own way. Exposed full color coverage, played with contrast settings, except for the contrastibility and brightness there more and there is nothing. The digital intensity only corrodes the eyes if raised. From the full color coverage of the picture on the eye does not change at all, and the black color is not as deep black as on the amd. AMD loses only in the price of the used market, you lose a little more. Nvidia for more than 15 years does not change anything in its drivers, there are all the same archaic settings invented in the last decade, that is the middle and end of the 2000s. Maybe it's not for nothing that new consoles work on graphics cards from amd. I would certainly choose nvidia if they were better, but I will choose for myself amd, for myself loved to be always choose what is better. That's when nvidia will be better in the picture, their drivers will learn to work as amd and interface will update convenient and modern as amd. Be sure to move on don't worry. If dx12 and vulkan work well as an amd, we will see all this in the new battles between the red and the greens in 2020 - 21. And if the greens are better than the reds, of course I'll choose the Greens. For now, I'll pick the Reds.
Kanych
On the amd-sh driver itself accelerates the frequencies to the maximum, there is a bus turn on when smoothing increase or resolution. Conversely, it lowers frequencies in non-demanding games, thereby saving electricity. No wonder the driver is called adrenaline. There and manually you can change the frequencies. (on nvidia drivers personally I did not find work with frequencies, may not have seen?)
I didn't see it. For nvidia, this is called "power management" in the settings panel, and has "maximum performance" and "adaptive" options. With the first version of the graphics card works constantly at maximum frequencies, in the second - lowers or increases the frequency depending on the load on it.
Kanych
Radeon 7, as if the name hints that there is a 7 nm processor. Amd shouted that this was the first 7 nm card.
You're such a fool of the frequencies. Nvidya also understates the frequencies in non-demanding games. That's.
And why do you compare 5700 xt against 2060s when competing for 5700xt is the 2070s.
And what difference does it make what cores of the Radion 7, because it stands like 2080, but at the same time lags behind in games from 2080. I'd be cheaper.
And yes, there are no graphics cards in the consoles. There's a single-crystal system like 2400g or 3400g processors.
I'm saying I'm not a nvid jerk, but the facts aren't worth twisting.
And yes about the color transmission amd vs nvidia, I want to see the poufs, not the empty ringing.
Since I have 2080ti and rx 570, I do not see the difference between them.
Alexander Kozlov
That's a fact! Sing amd! And in real life they do for people! like shouting rx 580 laja, and 1060 top and what did the greens do? stamped a bunch of cards the same and also sell and schoolchildren buy ! Yes agree the top models were not at the amd, but the masses bought 1050, and later the beginning too shit to buy 1650 (these cards level gtx960 ) , banal r9-280 is not worse than 1050 and 960, and this is an ancient model, silent already about 580-590 who show themselves very well