Budget computer (65-70 thousand)
Good day, dear!I think the title and so everything is clear. Interested in a PC for 65-70K, distribute outline in regard_ru(pretty low prices+Assembly goes, Cheb myself with a file not to sit) -
Spoiler
img.playground.ru/images/0/1/Bezimyanniy-81.png&.. width=780 height=822.13567839196 />The computer went out 67730 rubles.
----------
Components:
The housing ACCORD P-28B Black - cheap, good design.
Motherboard ASUS Z170-P - took the recommendations of the familiar, +DDR-4 and the price is not much bite.
Intel Core i5 - 7600 OEM wanted, of course, take the I7, but it hurts to look at the price.(may change to I5 7600k, but is it worth it ?)
Cooler for CPU AeroCool Verkho 2 - not very expensive + good cooling(judging by the comments).
Memory 16Gb DDR4 2400MHz Patriot Signature - Yes, I know, for gaming and 8GB is enough, but I often crash in some games, +the browser is running(the current 8GB in the stretch).
NVidia GeForce GTX1060 ASUS PCI-E 6144Mb - the choice fell on it, price+performance.
Hard drive 2Tb SATA-III Toshiba (DT01ACA200) - great hard drive, price+quality.
Power supply 600W 3Cott 3Cott-600-REVO v2.3 RTL - drew active PFC, lowest price.
Fan case Aerocool 120mm DS Black - the quiet solution for the case.
2nd Fan for case Cooler Master Silencio FP120 - 'm thinking to remove from the Assembly, but I'm afraid for higher temperature.
-----------
I would of course use SSD, but not with this budget. The 120GB will not be enough, most likely.
In computers I rummage a little, the outline is already deduced on existing knowledge, please sneakers not much to throw.
If you have any recommendations, please point out existing errors/schools with that build. No need to say that it is better to save up some money and buy a better one, I know this is true, but there is no way.
Exsairen
now that's cool ) mother without unnecessary overpayment, the percent of 7 th generation from cocoroco for reviews under the cover of the gum. memory 2 modules and power supply are normal. About read reviews, there anyone will answer Yes how are things in high coolers.
Exsairen
I have the case Zalman Z9 Plus. Very satisfied. But it will be more expensive...
VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
RAM 3200 latency CL14
Write the make and model, if not difficult. I need one of those.
Kirlusha
Yes please: V G. Skill Ripjaws 16GB DDR4 3200 K2 C14 16GVR or F4-3200C14D-16GVR. It is red and black radiators. The issue price is 10600. Red in CU anymore.
VOVAN WOLF
Thank you. I have a 3200 CL16, and now collect for sidekick comp, so I think to put yourself first for comparison.
under PERC i5 7600 I took mother of ASUS PRIME B250-PLUS. Everything works the same vidyuhi current from palitha.
meagarry
1) Usually, the choice lies on 1600 (not the 1600S), take the 1600S is considered to be meaningless.
2) the Difference in price is, which no - 4000 rubles (vs 14600 18700). The difference between 1700 and 1600 is 6000 rubles. 1600 the same approach, the acceleration manually, BUT it is an ejection from the 1700's, it often happens that it works stably on the frequency of 3.7-3.8. 1700H, say the better option, he, I think, did not read the reviews, and the chance to take the higher rate above.
3) chose the 1600S, because of turboboost 4.0, Atsutoshi fan, and shall we say, more elite rejection from the 1800S.
4) Believe that the chance to take 3.9 to the 4.0 has more than 1600. In General, the acceleration figures speak GGSN, because it all depends on how good the instance, someone will, and someone not. On a related hope not, there issued all selected instances + load, often give a small, simple software, and within a short time.
5) 1700 is INDEED more popular than the 1700S, but the reasons, again, that is. He has the same, kind of like the boxed cooler is pretty good. and the guys are considering the option of self-acceleration.
Himself to disperse not much intends, the processor - 1600S, go for girls. It does not disperse, but I think that turboboost, should improve the picture.
7) as for performance in games, it will have the same, but there are moments where 1700 sags. I think the best option 1600 processor.
8) There is another reason for the acquisition of the 1600S, for yourself. At the time of purchase as a boxed version 1600 went like hot cakes, so stood - is expected to arrive, took THEM APART, my eyes fell on the 1600S, boxed cooler I don't need, don't want the air flow blowing perpendicular to the motherboard, I remember this, dust on the motherboard was still good, I thought I'd put the tower will be quieter - that's important, well, blow off, rinse will be just the tower itself.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Eugene Astrakhan
I gather the second, for girls.
VOVAN WOLF
Thanks for the reply. Hmm... But if the 1700 and 1600s would cost the same, games would you still have taken the 1600s? say for map-level 1080/1080ti. I just started to think about upgrading, and at least I'll make it for sure not before next year, anyway, slowly begin to delve into the topic =)
meagarry
I guess that makes no sense to take rejection, it is better to take a full-fledged CPU as it is. To take the box version 1700. It's easy, any time can be turned into 1600 without problems. Core are deactivated, there is such a technology. Been tests where disabled he dragged better. (the choice between injured and intact...).
If we consider seriously, it was 1600 - the budget segment OR 6700 / 7700 / 1700 - the average segment. You have money, take 1700 or 6700 (but the version with Intel flies), is not enough - 1600 / 1500. In the whole balance.
In short, I would take 1700 (if not saved).
Why take the i5 7600? A waste of money. And the graphics card is the worst model from the 10th series. https://www.citilink.ru/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/parts/videocards/458733/ Here are the same.
PS IN CU add 5% to the total amount + shipping.
Personally, my opinion - relatively well, except for the railway. Toshiba and quality are incompatible.