Do I have hope to play massefect? (Mass Effect: Andromeda)
Healthy guys I played the last part and I liked it! But the computer at me old, my mom wanted me to buy new but have to play on the old(((((Here is my iron
stone I5 ----- the GTX 650 TI (this card is more powerful than a GTX 650) ---- RAM 4 GBB
I played this comp in the battle new the lag was tolerable but you can play it and this game will go normally, that would be 24 frames was the above? For ultra I do not chase me a high more than enough!
Metalist1925
I for all games missed 4! For the last battle enough with the stock I think it is more of a top game than an RPG masseffect
How long would I have staff? I do not believe that below 24 will fall
Metalist1925
I just need to know whether it is 24 frames me a game to swing a couple of weeks plus it will be expensive
Mishka2002
And? I'm not Vanga, how many frames you have, I don't know. But if everything is so difficult, well worth downloading
Metalist1925
Yeah how many have written and use some or sho frezite will and I know I need to know whether the stinking lag!!! I tried to find the test my graphics card on this game but not found so I do not understand computers, to understand how much I will have frames, I just don't just need to know will be above 24 or not!!! The simple answer need YES or NO
Mishka2002
Don't listen to them, kid. You long and expensive pump? They're just confused because you're jealous. Even at 30 frames go for a high stable! don't be afraid and download safely.
Mishka2002
My friend, consider that you're not a picture run on the desktop and a game in which there is dynamic change the frames per second and each frame loads different on your system, so you have no possible way to get a stable and constant 24 frames per second. I'm not saying that this is simply not a comfortable FPS. And my own feeling, the game have, if you really really want to go. The result: Hardly pull at all, and the game is even more disappointing.
Minimum system requirements:
OS: Windows 7, Windows 8.1 or Windows 10 (64-bit);
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570 or AMD FX-6350;
Internal memory: 8 GB;
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 or AMD Radeon 7850 with 2 GB memory.
I tried on an old PC to run in 1440x900 at minimum at ~30 fps , though with the drops because RAM only 4 GB and Athlone 3 kernel videhoe gt 730 1 gb ddr5/ Think 30 fps goes, it is better to lower the settings to medium-low and play at 60fps.
PapaSaloEst
I'm not your son! And already worked for two years with another car, just pay us for 7-8 thousand, and half I give them to my mother
Subaru BRZ STI
these requirements are for those who play on ultra I enough high
John14b
ATP you're the first person who showed specific figures are going to rock! I didn't even think about think 60 frames is nonsense lokhovsky what a difference 24 or a million frames when there is no one who sees faster 24 frames per second! You any movie on the computer and look in properties there is 99% it will be 24 frames!
On the minimum salary with the brakes.
Mishka2002 wrote:
these requirements are for those who play on ultra I enough high
High you play.
Mishka2002 wrote:
ATP you're the first person who showed specific figures are going to rock! I didn't even think about think 60 frames is nonsense lokhovsky what a difference 24 or a million frames when there is no one who sees faster 24 frames per second! You any movie on the computer and look in properties there is 99% it will be 24 frames!
Malakhov had seen?
24 frames per second for a person optimally in the movies, so he learned everything that happens on the screen...
And the eyes don't work single, and in a coherent manner.
DovaSky
who cares how the eyes work, your brain can't handle more than 24 frames!!! And your even more so. And people have already shown video games on ultraj and there was an average of 30 frames, so I have a high under 60,but I a stable 30 would be enough