The Roman Empire
This great superpower like the Soviet Union in the twentieth century. How do you like this ancient Kingdom? What would happen if it did? Let's discuss it.Bus97 wrote:
Still say that Hebrew is the oldest
Let me guess, the ancient Russian, in the Hyperborean Atlanta from Sirius saying?
Bus97 wrote:
And the lead, tin and aluminum such nonsense I have not heard even from the most inveterate liars
Bus97 wrote:
How are people with philological education, ready to take your eyes out with a fork
OK, your eyes sharpening with tin spoons.
Poke your, if you chose this man disgracing the profession. If I had a son became, not the night said, a philologist, I would have killed him, or if he hung himself, would not stand the shame. But if so, then yeah, you should be aware that in THOSE times of which we speak, English was definitely more difficult Latin. And dialects in the West was tueva hucha. People from different cities could barely understand each other. French itself was established only in the 17th or 18th century. And before talking on anything. Only with the advent of printing languages and writing systems began to come into order, in the form that we see now. Refute if you can, philologist.
Bus97 wrote:
If I had a son became, not the night said, philologist...
And who are you by profession?
Bus97
Ie you share a profession on a purely male and purely female??? Oh God, how your life is so hard))) I here, for example, by training a system administrator, but work in the specialty will not( did not like), so I want to go to sommelier courses and work in bars, restaurants.
Sommelier sommelier so. To each his own. As a profession, I do not share. And I don't care who does what. I'm talking about my family. BUT! If you choose a profession, be professional. So in any case.
But we are not talking about that. Not a subject. On the professions - on the other forum. Just the person to move is not necessary, if there is nothing to argue. Insult is not argument.
And what electronics do you have?
Again off topic question. But will have to answer. Worked as a designer at the Institute until the end of socialism, now the engineer on repair of medical equipment.
More on personal questions don't answer. Only in PM.
Playing
That's just too bad that many of us only read the books and those books which are recommended by our education system. A step to the side. Because such conclusions.
Bus97 wrote:
That's just too bad that many of us only read the books and those books which are recommended by our education system.
Many people do not read books. However, I can't make them to blame for it, as it is necessary to work hard to find among current literature something worthwhile, and not shameful trash. A school is most likely in the next thousand years will undergo great Patriotic classics, who wrote mainly about jerseysize any doubt the melancholic, the losers, and other killers/suicides, which in real life even ears chew.
The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire is best to know this peace among the Empires and Republics. It was a great civilization, all the rest of the bottom, but the Soviet Union then what side is not clear. Soviet Union a totalitarian state, whereas Rome never was. And the power and influence of Rome circumvents the USSR in the times and times. And Rome preached to imperialism (if it is Chu, I'm talking about the Roman Empire), capturing new territory, not necessarily (but not without it) the war, and carried all their culture, the Soviet Union was not engaged. And the Soviet Union feared and obeyed Rome. And if you take the history of Russia, it is better to take the Russian Empire, so for me, this is the best period of history in our state.
PS. I forgot about the civilization of the Hellenes (aka Greeks). She can compete with Roman.
PPS. Greek, by the way, for the Greeks an insult, they consider themselves Greeks, since Greeks they were called the Romans, when the Greeks became slaves to them.
GIGA-cBuH
Why? Yes, because we were led to believe that man descended not from God but from monkeys. And if so, then have him like an animal. GIGA-cBuH
Garrus-1994
Have you ever read what is there to discuss? Many here believe, and I including that the Roman Empire is generally a collective image, was stuffed with all cultures around, but the age of 18-19 so And ascribes to them a lot, which was not really.
By the way, about slavery. There were people who didn't want to work, was not able to support themselves and their families. It took to itself any other citizen, he was obliged to feed him, to contain. This is what the servant worked. And the state law is guarded. So there were no idlers and beggars. I don't specifically about R. I., this custom was in many countries. But we are not talking about slaves in the sense we understand it. I mean the spoils of war and so on. Was, perhaps, are not the quantities that we pour. Such terrible slaves, for their maintenance and security need a lot of money. And their labor inefficient. Take the United States. A lot of them on slave labor got rich? Only trouble.
And here's a question for you: what do you think king Arthur existed or is it just the image?
Bus97 wrote:
Why? Yes, because we were led to believe that man descended not from God but from monkeys.
You are warned Buddy, you were led to believe that man"evolved from apes, tomorrow you will suggest that people comes from God and a few days later you told that person evolved from rocks". And you know what's funny? You're making a deal out of the fact that, say, inspire people, and not from the fact that people - and this truth is suggestible by themselves and mostly not able to reach any Mature judgments about the origin of his own mind. And if the person is suggestible and his mind open to any information, his ostentatious outrage about this, not worth a penny.
Bus97
that is, thousands of slaves rioted against Rome just raged?as gladiators in the arena just yourself amused?Rome itself collapsed just rotted and collapsed and the reasons for this bunch including slave labor
golubkov
Already mentioned here, some with swords and some in uniform fought gladiators. And they amused themselves, and the audience was going just to gawk.
And what about revolts of slaves. Where is it written??? As far as I know, and not me alone, no written evidence about Roman Empire no. No!!! And especially about the slave rebellions. It was only LATER, much later, someone wrote that he had read a manuscript for someone, which States that.... And so on. No more. Other sidelist just yet. I repeat: NO ONE!
Bus97
that is, the original manuscripts of the Roman philosophers and historians would not exist?amused opening the belly of each other?beasts tore the people in the Coliseum who came there voluntarily?
And who said that animals tore someone in the Coliseum??? None of this, except for school textbooks, writes about it. There the fights were purely voluntary, in order not to lose combat skills.And the manuscripts don't exist. There's only much later copies of the alleged correspondence and the alleged contemporary documents. And no original. So. It is a fact. You can not look, they are not.