The consumption of the old and new build
At the moment system: Athlon II X4 640, gtx760+standard komplektuhi. Upgrade: 9600к+2070super. I have looked through almost all calculators power, everywhere absolutely different meanings) I would Like to find out how many eats the old system, and what it would eat the new (overclocking and memory frequencies up to 5GHz stone), it is the total value?BP chose the be quiet! System Power 600W 9, looked at Chieftec navitas 650 (about the same cost), but gryat that the load is very noisy.
Off. requirements 2070супер - 650W, but I think enough good 600W (215 from Superman vs 185 easy-2070), and why then to 2070 require 100 watts less (a difference of 30W at load)?
PS, looked up the voltage of Athlone (95w) - 1.376 in stock)
BIG_CrasheR wrote:
BP chose the be quiet! System Power 600W 9
Laugh? A percent that will eat, and the rest of the periphery? In such a system as you want less than 1000W to take BP makes no sense. Yes, the real consumption will be lower, but no need to take PSU to the limit. It is necessary to have at least some margin of power. So BP is less warm will be, and future supply will be, because over time the characteristics of the BP power is likely to subside a little. BP is clearly not the same piece of hardware. which is to buy into the change.
600 watt at most times, without a periphery 9600к with 2080ti eats under 400 watts.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-3600/18.html
At the most, so at the most. But if in modern games new PC begins to restart, escape to the forum do not need to ask - you will answer known.
vitalik76
vitalik76 wrote:
Laugh? A percent that will eat, and the rest of the periphery? In such a system as you want less than 1000W to take BP makes no sense
I did not understand it sarcasm??? then why is not indicated below, and the Nuba may be the truth. But if you really think so it turns out that you're a noob and why we suggest that is not clear.
Ideally without overclocking this system and 500 of his jacket without problems would be enough for the eyes, but when overclocked to 5Hz percent begins almost 2 times more to eat than stated in the specifications. But still 600 jacket this system will keep.
P. S. do Not tell what your system the power supply is set? Not lower than 1000W???
vitalik76
There is money - do not mind.
Or have you got two vidyuhi bottom on the sly?)
vitalik76
vitalik76 wrote:
1200W.
Then if you do not understand and buy such nonsense, then why not something to advise others?
PS Your my computer exceeding 750W power supply to take meaningless. And if you take quality type solonika it is 600 watt enough for the eyes even with overclocking a video card and CPU at a maximum of 4.3 Hz on all cores because without It
KillKammbest wrote:
Your computer exceeding 750W power supply to take meaningless.
The store is no sore. But my BP for over ten years and still no problems from the supply side, the heating, the whistle of chokes does not arise for old hardware or new. I would take back to back. probably would not one PSU during this time.
BIG_CrasheR
600 watt you think.
I 2080ti and 6700k and this build even 400 watts is not drawn.
So a good 600 jacket 100% enough.
And don't listen to the guys who take 3 kilowatt blocks.
Aloska
BIG_CrasheR
I used the KSA Power Supply Calculator WorkStation
Here's what I came up with:
But it should be considered acceleration.
So I put just in case, 1200w PSU. Moreover, previously, there was a SLI card
Aloska
I think Chieftec Navitas Series 750W [GPM-750S] to take (or Be Quiet SYSTEM POWER 700W 9). For its price just a good "Golden", but the reviews are almost there, and kind of noisy under load, as all ciftci. Now is the identity chiftec 550, the noise in heavy toys, and rendering.
STANDS of Milivoje
Something calculator there is much counted, although we can vidyaha such Pogorelova?
BIG_CrasheR
Why? I have noted every point that the comp. But with overclocking of course, so more will eat
STANDS of Milivoje
Strange calculator he believes?
At the peak 2080ti consumes 280w 8700k and overclocking to 5.0 GHz 160w
280+160=440, + vistapanel Wat will be 40.
What's on the 750 counted, I don't even know.
Aloska wrote:
Strange calculator he believes?
And ask him)
Aloska wrote:
vistapanel Wat will be 40.
What's on the 750 counted, I don't even know.
Vistapanel I have not that much about over Oprah) Plus gestate, have screw all sorts of large, regulators...
Now even look for any app in the network for this case
STANDS of Milivoje
Here's consumption with 8700k
In short to me will soon come ryzen 3900x, and if I will not 600w enough, I'll unsubscribe.
STANDS of Milivoje
Why do you bend to look for?
Buy a Watt meter Yes plug and have a look.
Aloska
When you 3900x coming? Make a review on it as Warp to 9900k. Only sensible to do.
STANDS of Milivoje
So everything is made to me, I have nothing new to tell.
Games will chop off smt, for work tasks to include.
That's all.
Some memory does not play him, don't care, they are not so dependent on memory as the previous generation.
Aloska
Aloska wrote:
So everything is made to me, I have nothing new to tell.
Not everything on YouTube is true. Therefore, for the interest make.
The Riesen was always dependent on the memory of the frolic is not? So love the great frequency, as there is a real sense of it. And Intel too