3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
B
BIG_CrasheR 13.10.19 11:28 pm

The consumption of the old and new build

At the moment system: Athlon II X4 640, gtx760+standard komplektuhi. Upgrade: 9600к+2070super. I have looked through almost all calculators power, everywhere absolutely different meanings) I would Like to find out how many eats the old system, and what it would eat the new (overclocking and memory frequencies up to 5GHz stone), it is the total value?
BP chose the be quiet! System Power 600W 9, looked at Chieftec navitas 650 (about the same cost), but gryat that the load is very noisy.
Off. requirements 2070супер - 650W, but I think enough good 600W (215 from Superman vs 185 easy-2070), and why then to 2070 require 100 watts less (a difference of 30W at load)?
PS, looked up the voltage of Athlone (95w) - 1.376 in stock)
33 Comments
Sort by:
A
Aloska 13.10.19

STANDS of Milivoje
STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
The Riesen was always dependent on the memory of the frolic is not? So love the great frequency, as there is a real sense of it
Due to the horse's L3 cache has spit on the memory of them.
There is still took a couple of people ryzen 3900x, I personally helped with the selection Board Ryazancev him thank you very much.
So if you want you can text version of the gash with benches when you come, I'll write what programs and games are most interested in, going to compare)

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

Aloska wrote:
Ryazancev
Good people just met. I'm Vova and he is playing quake 2017 all together

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

Aloska wrote:
So if you want you can text version of the gash with benches when you come, I'll write what programs and games are most interested in, going to compare)
GREAT!)

p
potter790 13.10.19

STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
And Intel too
Nonsense. I have 2400 under 7600К, and it already gives its negative result. And if you put even higher.

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

potter790
nonsense. I have 2400 under 7600К, and it already gives its negative result.
And I have the opposite problem. Just better, when compared with the previous frequency.
What's your problem?

A
Aloska 13.10.19

potter790
potter790 wrote:
Nonsense. I have 2400 under 7600К, and it already gives its negative result. And if you put even higher.
To put the above then what will happen?

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

potter790
Aloska
You now submit to ban. Already two warnings. So I write without fanaticism!

A
Aloska 13.10.19

potter790
Here's the other video memory and your 7600k

p
potter790 13.10.19

STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
What's your problem?
Yes no I have no problem, just the CPU performance a little worse than it could be from his own memory.

A
Aloska 13.10.19

potter790
potter790 wrote:
ROSTO the CPU performance a little worse than it could be from his own memory.
And the evidence will be?

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

potter790
Reduce the timings and subtyping! I used the same was the results Aida64cache & memory Benchmark. Now everything is fine, as in prog, and games became

p
potter790 13.10.19

STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
Reduce the timings and subtyping!
Why? I then 4K to zapusti will. ))
Her when necessary, she is sinking, that's a problem. Would stand native 2133 no drawdowns would not be.

G
GeRR_Praetorian 13.10.19

Aloska
Aloska wrote:
Don't answer him, he already used.
Spoilersi honestly I now the mushrooms cook))))) Run from the kitchen to the computer here and there. So as not to burn. Potatoes very fact)