Smartphone to 18 thousand with a large display

The pictures ASUS ZenEar S. In the same store the price of this headset is 1990 rubles. So, buying over standard 16900 RUB a smartphone, save almost 2 Grand. The characteristics are very decent. The ratio signal/noise is decent for earplugs.

redmi note 7

Evgenij_Kir wrote:
width ... 70 cm
Not enough for phone? xD

Evgenij_Kir
Took over 12 Tr
Spoiler
Awesome machine!
CPU: Sd 636/GPU:Andreno 509/3 GB of RAM lddr 4/32 GB rom/ips screen 2160x1080 6/5000mAh battery/Android 8.1/rear camera dual 13 mp front 8 mp,video recording in 4 to 30 fps.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5.

Busy Choate ceased to please, especially after the global exploits))) Saami... If the sale to take - rules of ketaya arbitration rare, with 4пда vylazit will not in finding the right firmware. I found a suitable alternative to in Vivo y93 - screen with snot, ACC to 4K, price 15 cents pieces.
Спойлерhttps://www.vivo.com/ru/products/param/y93

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7

Aurelius looks obviously more expensive than 15K. And how many hours missing the 4K mAh? Say front camera with f/1,8 (at the same time, the diaphragm main 2,2) does this Mean that the smart self-oriented? How is the quality of photos with the main camera (1 to 10) ??

Aurelius
I also question the SMARTS of xiaomi annoying, the two friends do the firmware eventually came off, with part of the data. What OS and vivo for stability, long smart chase, there is no problem? Percent draws the basic tasks without lag?

XS. Honor take of some sort. There sesnie went. And the filling axis is acceptable.

Tags
Honory not collected at the production sites Huawei. Because it is hardly possible to project the quality Huawei on Honore. Again, the specific model, specify, to be assessed camera sanye.
What do you mean by stuffing axis??? And what is it acceptable?
A better throw from Honor at the price of vivo Y93 as Aurelius. Compare a forehead in a forehead.

MuSStafA
I can throw stats are good, really good phone, thousands of so in 40-50. Because personally, I don't expect any super effects from Saami, which Alyx for 6K rubles you can buy. Figuratively.
So here, if the budget is 18K, and it is necessary to look for 18K. There are shops there and check. I'm not your Google, your mother)

MuSStafA
Well, Nova 3(though more expensive) can easily beat any iPhone 7. And 8th too. Che really there.
But all sorts of R lights and stuff in this range sucks.

Aurelius
But there is still Samsung Galaxy A50, the Redmi Note 7 , 8X Honor well and y93 In Vivo whole SMARTS look about the same level, Samsung this year And was pleased with the series in terms of design, but saved on hardware, honory and vivo fit devices for your money vivo in terms of design even more sympathy for me.

Tohs wrote:
I can throw stats are good, really good phone, thousands of so in 40-50.
Tohs wrote:
if budget is 18K, and it is necessary to look for 18K.
How are your two above sentences? The topic branch Smart to 18 thousand... Speech about SMARTS 40-50 thousand was not. Where did you dug?
Tohs wrote:
Well, Nova 3(though more expensive) can easily beat any iPhone 7. And 8th too. Che really there.
The author wants the screen on the entire front of the smartphone. Have Nova 3 huge eyebrow. What does the performance of APL 7,8? It benchmarks performance to date?

Petruxinson wrote:
But there is still Samsung Galaxy A50, the Redmi Note 7 , 8X Honor well Vivo y93
Samosas are good, but the cent is weak for that price. I'd Redmi watched and in vivo. The performance did not compare, but apparently the vivo looks more expensive than the redmi (due to thinner frames and more flavorful drops).

IMHO, it is not necessarily smart to cost 50K to be good. (unless of course you are not taking it). In fact, smart for 18, like A50 or Vivo y93 same Android, the performance is no worse on the eye the difference is not noticeable. Screen SMARTS for 18K already not grainy, also not everyone will notice the difference. Akkum holds even more than many flagships. Memory is no problem. The only thing that camera will be a little easier, but in fact the flagship, too far to cameras.

Allinos wrote:
not necessarily smart cost 50K to be good.
I agree, personally, I'm just sick of aplow and Samsung, even was would the extra money still they are not hunt to take too promoted brands and prices put on their models is not justified. And the price tags for a replacement screen module, people tend to drop and hit the screens, half the cost of the phone, and even more. It is better to take something like this vivo, which in principle is not inferior to the brand, so more and more interesting for some chips, and sheconomist.

Torkvist
Well, that's your personal opinion, someone samosas and Apple like the contrast, and they are buying everything they can lay hands on. Byte have the same objective, and on the basis of price/quality and performance characteristics, not personal preferences. I went vivo camera, especially frontalka and display with great color.

Allinos wrote:
Well, that's your personal opinion, someone samosas and Apple like the contrast, and they are buying everything they can lay hands on. Byte have the same objective, and on the basis of price/quality and performance characteristics, not personal preferences. I went vivo camera, especially frontalka and display with great color.
Well, I really like the A-series this year, Samsung, with iron they certainly disappoint if you take something more or less adequate, for example, A70, it already stands as a pose-last year's flagship. Vivo y93 above proposed in principle, externally nothing like this, and the hardware is adequate, given the price tag. Removes standards, the screen is good, battery 4000, calmly have a day and a half to keep. Well, if we take, vivo this or redmi 7.

From vivo the sound is good and camera, they kind of positioned themselves as a smart player and a smart phone camera for selfie. By design, it wins Saami, especially if you look at this flawed drop that now all the polls, here though she is small and neat, barely visible.