Interstellar (Interstellar)

A. Soldier of Light
In principle, each person has his own taste. One like one, others like another. Most likely everyone is right in their own way.

Over the past six months-a year interstellar is the second, vpechatlila me the picture (1 - the Disappeared). 2.45 watching flew by. The ending is a bit blurry, but she explains everything that happened, albeit slightly crumpled way. Elegant work of actors, epic ambient authored by Zimmer, a little bit sentimental moments at the right time - and voila! another film from Nolan for a solid 9 out of 10 ready. The thing to remember is that in the genre of science fiction, in this case an important role plays the definition of fantasy and not bother about minor and major mistakes in the script, from the point of view of geniuses and nerds.
PS: gravity are talking about? Well, well...

What is gravity? Bullshit for 3D view- only, and removed the film. Compare Interstellar with Gravity stupid and unprofessional =) In Interstellar there is an interesting story at least and watch it was interesting in General.
But everyone's favorite Extinct clearly someone overestimated as Argo and that movie about the slavery of blacks in America (theschool year in 2012 and 2013, officially.. hmm..)..

A. Soldier of Light
More movies should show, not tell, and in this regard Gravity is better - while at inter a lot to chew. About the story - in both paintings, there are shoals, so here they are approximately equal. And technically there is Gravity higher, and srezhisirovanno it better. In General, the paintings are approximately equal, the differences except in scale, but qualitatively similar levels. But I like Gravity more.

The film quality, but Kubrick's Odyssey I was once more impressive, as her philosophical questions.

Volt123
srezhisirovanno it better
Yeah, a lot of work and intelligence required to remove almost the entire film on a green screen ))

the movie is not bad 8\10. I may be a bit hard man, but after"Letters from a dead man the rest are just dust.

About Letters from a dead man...

Have the courage to watch it. If you are not ready, the film is very heavy, I watched it at 21, and he seemed very, um, violent chtol, not in terms of action and emotion, I went after him 3 days thinking about him, about us, about man, about society. What we the people are freaks.... THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT FILM.
I think the OPTIMAL VIEWING AGE 25+ who are younger simply do not understand all the tragedy and genius of this film. IMHO.

Watch only good movies, this film is one of them, if you have enough strength to watch it to the end.

And someone looked at SCIENTIFIC review of this movie in YouTube?

There is a cool video by Menyailov on this topic, called "Murder on the Ice Planet", you can find it in Yandex or OK: https://ok.ru/video/4515563637322

the whole film is patched up to show how a man flew into a black hole and got under the textures in his apartment.
flight from the planet from a logical point of view seems strange because the planet has free gravity and at the stations shown, most likely a centrifugal Coriolis carousel. on the ground, the station or bunker is located at approximately atmospheric pressure in space, it flies in a vacuum and depressurization is a problem there, so there are no spacious ring worlds, otherwise it’s all pffshshshshshshchshch. then in space there is any radiation and the design of a station on a planet with an atmosphere will protect it from it. This atmosphere does mainly in the extreme case of a lot of slag and building material in space, there is little of it, if planets are excluded. therefore, with this technology and energy, Tsiolkovsky was wrong.
for earthlings who will live on a planet that revolves around a black hole, everything will also not be very good and a dubious place for life in general. if a lot of the sun shines something that accretes onto a black hole, then everything is very bad; if a star flies there, then everything is a little better. the only thing that is cool there can be a sterile desert planet but with oxygen due to powerful gamma radiation, but in order for a planet with tectonics and volcanism to be so, it is not a fact that oxygen will go to the lower layers of the atmosphere while leaving there there will be a complex rotation of the planet for etava.
so the earthlings in this movie should do better genetic engineering, and the prospect of colonizing some other star system is more of a cool fallback since they've got a wormhole conveniently lost there. and a solar system with a giant black hole (not rotating as soon as possible, otherwise the space there will rotate to a heap, from which the wormhole will also begin to fly like crazy throughout the galaxy) (and the hole looks like it is not very rotating). still there will be problems and this is the distance. In total, everything there will be 10-15 times larger than the solar system, and if they flew to the wormhole in suspended animation, then they wouldn’t fly here for years, and so that they would have to accelerate to the planet that spins the black hole and then brake solidly and fly back later.
the ice on the planet was strange flying, it was still some kind of strange atmosphere there, even on approach, they would have noticed that there was nothing there, either the pressure was hellish or there was some heavy gas below, we were flying to the omega.
this is something that did not seem strange in the film as if it was like watching science fiction. and even with Morse code, you can transfer some data about the fundamental properties of gravity from egu mono through time or through textures like how to control a dunno on the moon here. and so cool every movie