Crysis no brakes
Hi all. Help to decide what I should upgrade.System:
CPU: DualCore Intel Pentium D 920 (2800 MHz; 14*200)
Motherboard: ASUS P5LD2-SE
Chipset motherboard: Intel Lakeport i945P
RAM: Samsung 2*512MB (DDR2-533 DDR2 SDRAM)Timing:5-4-4-11
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT (256 Mb)
HDD: WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 (250Gb)
The power unit on 350 Watt
Crysis default are exhibited the lowest system requirements. I play: resolution - 1024*768, additional settings on high., only quality shaders on medium. The RESULT - 20-25 fps, but there are times when the computer hangs, is loaded and then plays(quite often). Want to enjoy the beauty without being distracted by the brakes. Thought to add two more strips 512 are identical to my own. Waiting for your advice.
PS: a Friend told me that my system is not playing, is this true?!
P. S. S.: And it makes sense to put the 8800 GTX or the processor will not allow?
I am waiting for advice, THANKS in advance!
Going to buy a new computer crisis was the last straw.Please vote on what to expect with this configuration?
[Motherboard]: ASUSTeK MAXIMUS Extreme
[PROCESSOR]: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
[VIDEOCARD]: GeForce 9800 GX2
[MEMORY]: 2*1Gb 7-7-7-21
[CASE]: Thermaltake Armor+ VH6000
[POWER supply]: power supply Thermaltake ToughPower 850W (24+8+4+4х6пин) Cable Management
[AXIS]: Windows Vista Ultimate
Memory take 4 gig.
Well and to it 64-bit Windows.
PS. I would take Core 2 Duo E8400 speed almost otlichish and save a hundred bucks : )
Juice86
It is evident that picked by the mind and by the fact that more and where the above numbers - timings for the memory PPC ... (probably thought that times higher the number the better? xd)
IMHO the config some show-off..
[PROCESSOR]: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
-------------------------------------------
Better 4 cores.Core 2 quad 6600qx.on future projects.(for a year or two ahead.)
And then six months later will be the mother of your processor and on the right and left.
- I don't have a Crisis without brakes is at a maximum.
Allfa
The fact of the matter is I don't want 64-bit,most programs are sharpened by 32.
Yes, I've kolebletsja moreover, there was news that in the future the frequency will only pick up but the acceleration I am not engaged and 3 pieces of the total price is only 5% so I chose it.
M Schumacher
How to say if a period of six months is enough to think about anything and everything,besides it's not only the new and powerful pieces of iron it is also a massive upgrade,but what about the timings I'm aware that the lower the timings the faster the operations are,I just need the mother* with support for DDR3 and as you know this memory is now cheaper until you take what it is and then this mother* is only a plus.
Golden wolf
also thinking about it even when you chose between the e6750.
4-core et nice but for gaming the best CPU frequency and not the number of cores(I'm talking about 4 cores)
3.200 2.600 against and the tests show that the performance is equal,but I'm still more of a gamer.
In any case, thank you all for your answers.Criticism is always good,once again convinced in his opinion.
Juice86
Well, ddr3 memory no plus nothing. Take normal DDR2 and all.
After 6 months, it is necessary to take a q9450 or 9550 and not 2ядерник...
In General, not their brains par - podberesh through 5мес for a month and you will have easier - and now it is guesswork.
Juice86
90% of existing programs are compatible with 64-bit axis. And the nonsense that 32 bit programs will not run on 64 bit axis is gossiping grannies. And programs such as 3ds Max etc. is there a special 64 bit.
And two gig for Vista is not good. Trust me you going to spit, preferably 4 or more. And 64 bit axis definitely. X86 generation too long it's time to give freedom to the young the X64 architecture ! Which is much manufacturer it.
Those who are 4 core percent of type Quad. This is also the past. They have a small Cache. The new E8*** manufacturer-it is a Quad.
And the nonsense that 32 bit programs will not run on 64 bit axis is gossiping grannies
Tyzh grandmother and now stuff splitnodes !
Those who are 4 core percent of type Quad. This is also the past. They have a small Cache. The new E8*** manufacturer-it is a Quad.
When you need a 4 core then you are on the other zapoesh !
Afganistan
Get out of your bad head of the game. Then you will understand that kernel is not for GAMES ! On the computer, not only games are there. For core E8*** series will be enough for 2-3 years. And 4 Nuclear not for games !
I understand that on a 64 bit OS is compatible with 32 bit, if you first hear it... I Think this is news for you.
VirusT3. Then you will understand that the core not for GAMES
...and for games and for work fit very well : ) you probably wanted to say that the full power of 4 cores is still not one game does not hold until... whatever games it is better to take 2х3000 than 4х2400. I think so. Core speed Rules!
Juice86 In a Crisis you will love not play normal!!And what about dvukhyadernye percent faster in games and back office operations faster chetyrehjadernyj!!
Allfa
Yes, that's what I wanted to say :)
Of course better yet at 3GHz per core. Than 2.4
I don't know, odd you Crysis is not so good. I have a Core 2 6420 and a Geforce 8800GTS 640 (G80) On XP is excellent. 35фпс on High without smoothing in the abundant foliage c AF16x resolution 1440h900, though none overclocked + all the patches are falling fps until at least 23 ( with hard shooting and great abundance of explosions) max fps is 75 when looking at sky. =)
For Crysis lacks any percents Core 2 6хх0 not dispersed, but it is desirable that he had a 4mb cache and more. Geforce 8800GT enough for the eyes for resolution 1024x768. I have a friend in 10 derike chopped fine without AA. 34 fps
DaGGeR25
In XP all is good.. Then discussed it dx10 very high. On such settings only 1024x768 or max 1280x1024