Crysis no brakes

16x - 8x and 16x - 16x , the performance difference is almost there. And anyway, IF, like dual-chip vidyuhi - ha*but that's all.

for today's vidyuhi Yes. But still I want to make it all humanly with a small margin for future new cards will have 8x more noticeable and even more so in SLI .
So I'm trying to tell him that what SLI & Crossfire is either for the oligarchs who buy a new computer every month or naive , believing that he is overcharged and sobiraet such pontovoe system with SLI or Crossfire - so this big favor..

M Schumacher
You almost convinced me))) but anyway just buy a new 9***gtx will not be able (due to financial position). Then you can answer the current one question?? (that could be me for a long time reassure)
On youtube there are a shitload of videos where the authors claim that ran crysis in dx9 + ultra high mod (or rather? it's called xconfig, where the installer can choose the degree of change) on the 8600gt. Is there the same opportunity (assuming that the authors are stretching the truth a bit) to run on my present system (e8400 or something similar for the price, 4gb, 8800gts - is already there, and the mother with x38 or p45 - as it will) to the resolution of 1280*1024 and intelisence let's say 4????
On very high under Vista, I hope not))) (though I assure about the great performance without AA).

The 8800gts will pull Vista on Very High 1280x1024 no sglazhivanie. As for Ultra - High I put them and that's what I noticed - Yes the picture is a little better than just VEry high on XP , BUT it is clear that the author specifically modified configuration so as to facilitate the loading of the graphics card on Ultra high miniseries drawing much - I've played sales frustrating was that all constantly filled. And that's just on very high (Xp) the distance tall - appear even palm trees on the islets at the first location. So I have the ultra high were given even more FPS than very high. Right now I play on very high (xp) on 1680x1050 - 25 fps on average for me, everything is fine. About smoothing it's hard to say what will happen - it is very very heavy none even 8800ultra/ I Have no antialiasing at 1680x1050 after an hour of continuous play memory is not enough - Crysis eats 570mb// FOR 1280x1024 of course this will not happen but with smoothing may be.

So I deleted the config Ultra High - if you can put it or tell me where to download ( that was exactly what it is that about which you speak) and I protest and say hopping FPS - well I have just E8400 , 8800gts 512 , 2giga 800mhz/

And what do you have Monique? 19* ?

You decide for himself. I can buy a second - growth that certainly will. But will also many related issues - will be essential to optimize the game for SLI - that is the new game came out - and you wait a couple of weeks when it will be added in the wood so I could play. Etc But better I think - 7tys for the second postpone , and in the fall to sell already bought the 8800gts thousand for 3-4 = 10-11 thousand FOR this money you can already buy a good map ( 9900gtx who knows if the competition is Udet from ATI can and will drain cost to fall) or ATI 4870 (x2) if successful will be released , just to be 9900gts , although it is not known which of the GPU.

in my conference to the gpu in dx10 veryhigh 1280 35

fps

M Schumacher
http://files.filefront.com/XConfig+130exe.
The program has a choice of five configs (low quality->high quality). Says that ultra settings are kept current very advanced pc's, sli top card.... For me personally, performance has increased, as the picture quality is... Strange, it is unclear, however whether the code is optimized (I would like to think =)) ), or simply, as you said, something is sacrificed.
Thanks for the advice, if fall, the tension will not be with money, can buy chtonit from the new line (current I think the cost will be gtx and 8800gts in the beginning, about 16 17тыс)
arctic93
you AA included? by the way, familiar with brand is system 1280 and the maximum AA and AF flying krayzis (he did not see, he is the benchmark did not think to ride)

ygyg
remember that everyone has the concept of fly is different. For me such is 30фпс , and someone 50.
Heh so a bunch of modders improved the game code, which worked the best programmers?? Just stupidly cut a couple of important parameters on which the quality of picture is not affected but very unload graphics ( draw distance). The game is optimized further. Just need to understand that such a graph cannot be forced to plow for the current hardware. And those who say that the game is optimized suck or don't know the technical part of the game ( most importantly the polygonal ) or angry that they have not gone.

SCHA check.

so . ON Ultra High 1280x1024 no AA - average 25-26 fps , but it has slipped to 11 - as it turned out due to the atrocious utilized capacity of video memory - RivaTuner showed 680Mb ..
And on Very High (without this mod, just pereimenovaniya ddl files) 1280x1024 without AA - 28-32 - when everything is stable because the memory is only 500mb/

Yes, the picture is a little better than very high. The range is the same. They increased slightly the effect of the sun , made dynamic lighting a La Half-life 2 ( which just infuriates me.. as always the brightness is changing), but most importantly affected - it just made a bit darker - tweaked colors and all. This picture has become richer. With the same effect on very high to reduce a little scale .

AA has not tried but yields a decrease of 5-10 fps (4x).

Before that I had another Ultra high. He was handsome but with a reduced range of drawing.

The result - Crisis need DOH.I of video memory on resolution above 1280x1024. And especially with antialiasing.
So the fact that on gt200 and 4870 will install the memory with 512битной bus and the volume of the gig (on gt200 for sure) can not but rejoice.

p.s. Test on the default. And I have it overclocked to 770/1850/2100 - +10% of performance ( + 2-4 fps )

Yeah..promised to developed fashion that the needs will be at the high level, and it appears that it will be easier with the hated Vista and dx10. Thank you for the test. But to justify the drop in fps can only increase the detail. If I'm not hallucinating, then, for example, very high in the bark of palm trees - a simple model covered with textures, and ultra uses normal mapping (there are all sorts of grooves yeah cracks are perfectly visible). Look plz. With 9 fps it's just hard to compare karanko.

Although consumption of more than 600MB, you still follow your advice and forget about sli and will work part time until the output on the gt200. Current plz tell me what mother (or chip) is now worth taking in the future, under such a miracle. And does it make sense to take the PSU to 850, even if I heavily overclock + second hard + future map that to eat can be incredibly???

And what mod is used for ultra-high and on what system? (a lot of mods, I do not know what to put)

P. S. Yeah, fail me in the summer. Going like a scalded cat, orders to deliver... (in many ways to blame Crytek))))

Guys,I would like just to make sure:athlon +6000 3.0 ghz,2 gb ram,the power supply for 350w,geforce 8500gt(256mb)I want to take the palit 9600 gt sonic and the unit on 450w,I think crisis on high with a resolution of 1280 by 1024 pull!If I'm right!waiting for your comments,but not stabak!

powerful vidyuhi 15-20pieces don't plan because the money to spend ,so once in a game to play,silly

ygyg
Very High I test on XP - 99% of the pictures that on Vista but much faster. ON Vista is worse than XP on the Ultra.

Why now is the motherboard? You train the system that the profile works? I understand you want kupiti completely new computer? Well then in the fall all and buy. Why do you have right now to buy a p35 or x38 when the fall will be able to buy for the same money let's say P45 . And all cheaper. Autumn certainly q9450 will be the normal cost in the region of 7-8ths. And then it will gather all. And while at your current config I do not see sense to buy new. You and so everything right now is fine. So why waste drain money on something that will be better by 10-20%.

Nirosta
Yes

Yes, not Schumacher you don't quite understand,I want none with the power supply to change and I don't know if 450w on the 9600gt,and will the crisis on my comp with a resolution of 1280на1024,high(high) settings??!

Nirosta
If BP high-quality take it will not be any problems , everything should work even with the stock. In Direct x 9.0 will go on high settings with no problems.

in the latest issue of pc gamer was published on a computer with the following parameters:percent-quad9550 2.83 ghz,chipset mother-780I sli,power supply is 1250w,memory-4GB,hard drive of 1 terabyte,and most importantly, three vidyuhi geforce 8800gtx 768mb...and this monster showed in the crisis, but 32фпс, here mega think what monster needs at this fucking crisis..in one word it is a well premeditated arrangement with the manufacturers of computers year 2,to more pull with gamers money..((

to guide I have Vista 32-bit with Director 10 count минус7-10 fps under those indicators that on XP..but maybe in the early summer will take the computer and are torn between two fires help to choose оффтопhttp://www.smart.EN/catalog/pk_notebooki/computers_startmaster_magnum_exe/4/20/act/ there are 2 models for 28999 pieces which is better....sorry for offtopic

Nirosta
Best for games in which processor 8400. I do not recommend to buy in startmaster very expensive.Anyway just stick with bread to remember the summer not kipyashis , summer will come the normal Ati 4870 and Geforce 9900GTX/GTS , saberes a comp with a new vidyuhi normal store Sunrise , Ultra ,Nix ,Fcenter for tezhe money that startmaster only more powerful. And in Crysis with the current graphics cards only play in 1280X1024 resolution without antialiasing enabled.
Anyway have a PC you don't so lame , you can spend almost painless upgrade , put BP watt on 450-500 (FSP , Thermaltake , Coolermaster) and a 8800gt and you will have happiness.

Nirosta
...and this monster showed in the crisis, but 32фпс, here mega think what monster needs at this fucking crisis..in one word it is a well premeditated arrangement with the manufacturers of computers year 2,to more pull with gamers money..((
It's 100 pounds, clean draining money from gamers, I'm almost sure that even if 9900 gx2 in quad sli you still won't need fps for a comfortable game, IMHO the game is not optimized at all!

Nirosta
I wrote to you, Yes, should be okay at 1280x1024 on High.

If BP normal then 450 would be enough (honest) watts.

So damn tired already to repeat.. even CRysis will go on the computer in 2004 .. on my old computer was excellent in the minimal medium. The computer that you brought 32фпс will be given on the resolution of 1920x1200 but still can and smooth.

You can't buy Ready computers..

Rohen
Materiel teach.