Whether to wait ryzen?
Hi all. I like a man, without fanaticism,to buy something that will work and is not expensive. Take for example the fact that in 2014 buying a i5 4570 will be enough for 2 years that's for sure. But time flies and here come the 2017 dollar growth by leaps and bounds and intel added 5% performance, the user calls a user who dispersed processors free riders (modernity probably shit Halavanau). I do not like it and the pricing policy which is 450 bucks offers 4-core processor with virtual threads, which in modern games with mnogopotochnoy faster TOPICSA 20% (not Progres and PROGRESSIXE). In the end, how in your opinion should I wait for audessy stone for $ 250 or not?There is an article that allegedly Riesen showed poor performance 5-15% of the raw BIOS and Windows 10, which it still works with this processor. Tests all reviewers were different. One of the reviewers supposedly putting the power of Windows for maximum performance and he was a parity between Ryzen 1700 and Intel i7 7700k. And Reisen worked at 3.9 GHz, and i7 7700k(5GHz) I don't know how true test but there is a video. In General it is necessary to wait for the fixes in the BIOS and until the software is finished and wait for the second wave of tests.
W3aMisterWinner
Hey I have a buddy 7700К and gtx 1070 if locked 60 fps in watch dogs 2 that the CPU loaded at 70%, I do not understand what kind of freezes are you talking about? Neither he nor I have not seen these freezes where where to look tell?
To game GPU test a certain segment of the video, plus in the main game at launch without patches.
You know the thing where 8 core Intel makes Intel 4 nuclear, 8 nuclear Riesen dangles at the level of the i7 3770, it's not optimized for 8 cores then it's the CPU.
Let's not portray Wang and say how much is enough fast 4 core, for example new Kabi lake for lga2066 Intel is positioning as extreme gaming and especially for gamers and it 4 nuclear and high-frequency 6 or more nuclear skylake it will be. Watch dogs 2 even 6900К far removed from 7700К, though here it is his core that does not interfere with open.
So while this is only a wild fantasy of armchair analysts and hope, as at the time FX was.
You know when I drove the first test everybody was shouting where is the king of processors watch dogs 2 it's not fair, brought up watch dogs where the case is still worse, that, wat, break the pattern, all included Wang, like in the future, when you do not know it will all break and can not tear.
Of course everyone decides for himself, but I want the performance now and here and everywhere, not only where it may be brought in one or two games in the future, Riesen, Intel works everywhere as soon as you can, and Riesen selectively, I is not happy. How is he behind 7700К, even if you drop optimize under rayzen, he is at best equal to 7700К, not ahead that's for sure.
John14b
Yes, Yes, Yes, bad dancer prevent that...? BIOS button in Windows, whatever else anyone can think of?
3dnews already wrote on this occasion that all were put on maximum performance, not really, you think all the testers for children? BIOS was the latest. AMD itself officially wrote that type of optimization in games is not present under Riesen (as under FKH fiction) about any BIOSes speech was not. As usual otmazy viditeli button in Windows forgot the treasured magical click games only, synthetics, and without her job, as her children to God.