3 10100 Intel vs AMD Ryzen R 3 3300X

gennaz
But in tests in d12 shows that 3300x, and what the markers like.

Lex-one
And in DX 11 too,plus vs 7nm 14 nm, PCI express 4.0. At least one plus have with Intel in the 10th generation?

gennaz wrote:
At least one plus have Intel
The wrong way you put the question. )
If they are equal in benci compete in the games for amuda very sad all will be. But if you choose the i3, it is better 10300, he's got a higher clock and boost the gap smaller. Here they have to surprise. )

if you have money buy intel, it is best to buy intel.

legusor
This is assuming that you have 2080ti is behind, then your words have meaning.

Lex-one wrote:
you 2080ti behind the Board
It 3300X? You're a humorist, he would pull the 2060S, and even without S.. this is in full HD, about 4K then it is better not to remember. ))
Such garbage, by the circumcision of cores, Intel was doing ten years ago.. three cores three gigs. At first this was no good, not to mention productive. Second, your barrel of shit they got for it, and more was not engaged. Now, as usual, everything new is well forgotten old.. amuda thing, well, why not yeah. And all the experts as one silent on this issue. The envelopes are probably more expensive.
As they say, buy I only then do not complain. )

Even watching obvious video can not themselves understand that it is better lived.

I wonder if AMD Ryzen R 3 3300X stuck to in my GA-AX370 Gaming K3 with a frequency RAM 3000Мгц,I had used the same figures in RDR2 load 2080Ti to 97%?
Both configu prices on Mat Board slightly more expensive than the 17K,but for some reason this one did not pay attention, all watching CPU

gennaz
Ryzen 2600 better at the same price ! Do not tell people these VIDOS ))))

Here VIDOS do not tell people with such comparisons even have PS5 8/16 threads Ryzen !

I pitch it seems that modern processors from Intel and AMD on a plot of approximately one if you count the difference in the performance of the architecture. listed on a single frequency and optional to one core.
maybe there will win the processor with a faster and more voluminous cache for a long same name of the package tasks. theoretically, it would be good GPU physics to CPU processing test, and some sort of real storm benchmark ber ische and instruction to eliminate
and so stupid yet you can choose who has the higher frequency and more cores
and so theorem Escobar on these processors. as for me it's not worth it to buy all 8 threads. Nada 12 and 16 better for the next-gen games on the Pitch

puumar
the game is for amode very sad all will be
In the video tests and games 3300х bends aw 3 10100 at the same price!
But if you choose the i3, it is better 10300
So he and the price will be more expensive and it will compare with the more expensive CPU from AMD.

gennaz wrote:
In video test games
Well, still, who would doubt. )
But in the 4K test will show? to complete the picture so to speak. ))
gennaz wrote:
and it will compare with the more expensive CPU from AMD.
This is why? You don't compare correctly. Two models 10100 and 10300 and 3100Х and 3300X. You somehow compare 10100 and 3300Х.. that is an indicator.

puumar
You somehow compare 10100 and 3300Х.. that is an indicator.
Because the price is the same. Heard about price/performance?

gennaz
Do not intellibo about prices in General, heard nothing, sold a kidney and bought intol)

gennaz wrote:
Heard about price/performance?
This logic 3100Х it is cheaper.
And 3300Х is a super-duper Zen2, though circumcised. Marketing such marketing yeah. )

puumar
puumar wrote:
And 330Х is a super-duper Zen2, though circumcised.
Cropped Zen 2 which bypasses a full Intel.
Hmm, somewhere Intel took a wrong turn.