Full or part-time?

What sort of training is better and why? Why do students study full-time, if possible by correspondence? If the employer looks at it?

Individually all. Full-time adequately, if:
- the student is really learning, and not walking around with a wad of cash at the ready
teachers do ask, and do not throw in the pocket of the student appraising look
If the opposite is true - no matter what is written in the student's diploma. Knowledge was not, and will not increase.
I was not very happy all the time. Therefore, to chose the translation of the correspondence, job, moving, new job. It is convenient for me. The teachers are the same. Not asking is worse, i.e., requirements for response serious. Any bribes. The diploma? Now and not working on a specialty so that the form of education is given less importance.
When applying for serious public office - Yes, it is important to have face to face.
With my specialty - no difference. All historians wishing to stay in this area, read, learn over program. At least all my friends.
Concerning Finance. The correspondence also there are budget places. I went with budget for the same.
Second degree to obtain if I do, also in absentia, because by that time I'll have a family and a permanent favorite.

I say - FUCK ADIN no knowledge. I guarantee it.

Of course, if you go to College to just wean, and then a Manager to go to work, OFC no knowledge is not necessary

The correspondence is definitely better as you don't have to waste time sitting pants.

I have two classmate of the same age and another under 30 and nothing to learn.

Never too late to learn. [4]

On my course studied the guy, 23 years. In the beginning there were some problems, but then standards have risen. Full-time. The correspondence studied my aunt, got a diploma in 35 (only 36) years.

It depends on the circumstances. Though I for personal.
Solerno if you need a stupid crust - better correspondence. In my city all the easier bought, studying it in the correspondence form.

At the moment, for 1 option.

No. People have the right to change the scope of activities always .

Self-improvement is never too late!

Cheek steeper.

I'm a bachelor, 2nd year. The bachelors points 4 years zaochku 5 years, masters points 7 years (3 years beyond bachelor's 4), about the master's degree extramural studies even not interested. No, zaochku maybe tempted, but points as something familiar, I don't want to change anything. And year of life is also a reason.
In General, it is unlikely for master's I'll do after graduation.

Vector5007
Welcome

Later Lee in these years is studying at the University on full-time education, while living in the Dorm?
Okay, 22-25 years, it's time to obschazhnyh booze!

th a stupid question

full-time, walls it does not say give knowledge)

22-25 years - this time graduate. kids like 17-year-old students. no different. today's youth retains immaturity. unfortunately.

to study never late.

To learn from the full, in principle, not later than in 50 years. The question is, where to find a sponsor that will hold such overage fellow within 5 years of study.

From the correspondence form has two advantages: first, during the period of study have acquired some work experience (if you're lucky, close to the chosen specialty), and, secondly, the ability to earn. Throughout the rest of the day training, of course, better.

Studied and and so. Zaochke knowledge virtually any are purchased, the only thing saved is the fact that already have got a job in this specialty. On the day form of training quite a lot of received knowledge. So I'm only for full-time training!