4K gaming
I want to upgrade the monitor from 22 to 27 inches 1080p/2160p. It is clear that the existing iron at a reasonable price to pull 4K no. Calculation on the game in 1080p. The multiple resolution and pixel density is large, but it is not clear whether the picture to look comparable if it was a 27 monitor/1080p. Or when stretching the picture will turn into a soap shit?There are owners of UHD monitors, can you tell us about the pitfalls?
An__ei
Found. But you if put the video on the channel, upgrade to 1080. On your channel under the video there is a button to improve the video. Even gamma correction can be carried out.
For example as I have.
And copy I know you just wrote An__ei Ch_____ov, so I was looking for. )))
RDIFB0
Soap is shit like you said ! Especially the font in games and so on.
Take put on your monitor so 720p is almost as if 1080p on a 4k monitor.
And yet, if you have a graphics card with HDMI 1.4 you 4k and 60Hz/60fps does not Shine ! Cugarette with PS4pro broken off ))
X_ray_83
nor the same. pixeli undergo interpolation with sognami pixels from what must be an overlap.
in order to understand what should be the permission of type 960h540 naturally the money had to be in-game antialiasing and it is where fonts are embedded under full BH video booth smilin so as to be converted into their non-standard resolution.
to recreate how it will look one matrix for scaling another very difficult task.
ha, a question once in the forehead. Why should you bother to buy 4K monitors, 4K if all games are this kid's shit? What, the Witcher 3 in 4K? Dying light was in 4K? And the games of the Golden age of 2004-2007 VUASCHE soared pursuit of high resolution. So why all of a sudden as soon as the game became worse, dumber and uninteresting to the masses began to promote the theory of 4K gaming and they say buy. And okay, so because people really somehow is hawala. WHY?
New Igori support 4K due to the fact that the resolution of all fonts and Huda ( some of it is not texture woose rendered , and polygons ) be sufficient , what would 4K look not blurred + the guarantee that the sink should not even be on the top / pretape of GeForce . Already spend too much time stopitsot times this canoe does not calm down , alala .
Suitable for 4K desktop in the first place , very spacious ( though small , is an inconvenience at first , it is who sits as still important ) , I personally like small fry ... But in photoshop or working with photos , it is very difficult to determine the true sharpness and photo quality , hard pixel-level precision to achieve in photoshop ... There's a standard for Me , Ala 23-24 with 1080-1200r , very convenient solution for working with photos .
So very torn for this 4ka is not necessary .
Very good 1440 and 1600P ( second and Lafayette ) , it is better to take them , it's the balance today .
MunchkiN 616 wrote:
1 pixel in full BH is ravnagora 4 Pixela respectable monitor. therefore soap should be minimal
This was the plan, but seems all wrong radogno. Although re-reading bourgeois forums I ran across the fact that some monitors can.
STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
True here noticed that on the monitors 27д with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 specific milovatsky! 27д, but I play it in 4k resolution.
Let's not confuse a coarse-grained picture and the picture is blurry due to a non-native resolution.
X_ray_83 wrote:
Take put on your monitor so 720p is almost as if 1080p on a 4k monitor.
And yet, if you have a graphics card with HDMI 1.4 you 4k and 60Hz/60fps does not Shine ! Cugarette with PS4pro broken off ))
Well, not exactly, evenly 1080 to 720 is not divided. 2160/1080 = 2 = OK. With videokarty everything is OK, there are 2 HDMI and DisplayPort 1.2, I checked it out.
Cegth RFR wrote:
ha, a question once in the forehead. Why should you bother to buy 4K monitors, 4K if all games are this kid's shit?
Monitor the kind of thing that is bought for a long time, and not just for games. I want to take for growth. 2160p density for a 27 inch I think it is OK to not like the pixels were sticking out. Windows 10 is already like a little support masturbirovala interface, see the fonts without pain dream.
RDIFB0
finally the essence of 4K in my opinion is to drive without much aliasing and no visible pixels and other grains.
the causes of soap 2. this interpolation scan to another scan. but this does not automatically mean that the game will be seen soap. here is more from the matrix of view and distance dependent. the second is quite obvious that internal smoothing of the game and precision shaders for permission. modern games can tell because of the ERP and the TTA are very bad for example 900. it is simply impossible to see fine details. and in 1080 it looks very fine although I have his monitor actually supports across the width, it is equivalent 900п.
hence the expected the higher the resolution the less soap. but from the matrix it is the matrix properties. Minh not expensive IPS is not suitable for professional use likely there is a real soap from the matrix only in 1280x960 with native 1600x1200. for resolutions of 800x600 and 1024x768 I have just can find if you compare with a CRT monitor. only just because a large area filled with one color can be more visible glow on the granite kontrastnykh island. but it is necessary to examine the screen under a magnifying glass.
and that was just a perfect image in games probably not happen. need a matrix with very respectable coverage of RGB contrast black and that was speed. as pravelo this does not happen.
MunchkiN 616
No if you compare c 4k video, then you will see no options ! Max soap will not be already QHD, but there are also nuances.
The meaning of FHD 4K monitor is... if you ever cut in the max resolution to put less do not want.
RDIFB0
All quite true, especially seen in the Witcher 3 like 720p and put ladders where the same without them.