RX 470 (4Gb) vs GTX 1060 (3Gb)
For a long time was without the card, my 780Ti was sold a year ago for$ 500. Since the game for me has long moved away a little into the background, decided to allocate new only 250$. And when I looked what is going on in the market is slightly ofigel. How is it possible that nVidia sells higher-performance product at a lower price relative to AMD? What has changed for this year?It was always clear that memory capacity is not important and remember the days when video card manufacturers were not put at the time 2GB of memory and sold them for pennies hoping for a sucker, as only 800 MB then it was enough to wipe the dust various offers.
But in the days when 4Gb may not be enough, nVidia still with their three gigs is killing AMD but puts its price tag is not twice as expensive, but also cheaper, while that of the GTX 1060 fps in some games may be higher by almost two times than that of the RX 470.
Can anyone dispel my doubts on this? In fact where's the catch? Did AMD beat Intel and nVidia in a few months so that takes the money not for performance, but for the brand?
----------------------
UPD all disturbances above at the moment are out of date, as speculation of prices RX 470 come to naught and the pricing was ustakanitsya. However, the topic based on the content of your title remains relevant.
Sites
The fact of the matter is that gone. How then 3 gigs nVidia GTX1060 omskakelaar RX470 AMD with four gigs? Despite the fact that the price tag for nVidia below?
Sites
when those times were?
playing since 1999, and always not enough memory
recently 1060 with six gigs bought, has launched ultra Rise of the Tomb Raider and everything is completely clogged))
N1KО wrote:
How then 3 gigs nVidia GTX1060 omskakelaar RX470 AMD with four gigs
proper compression and caching, and loading of textures. at NVIDIA always had the best programmers from the iron could make the most
lecoharv
I understand that, but when I look at the price of both cards, in my head there is a kind of dissonance.
Why, then, such is the price of RX470?
N1KО
Version 1060 3 gig less efficient than the version 6 gig in it reduced the number of processors and blocks.Likewise at AMD 470 it slightly cuts 480.Sapphire is 470 8 gig with neurtonin frequencies-so it yields only 3-5 FPS 480 models and 7,300 UAH-here is her and take.
And well, still forgot-at DX 12 cards AMD performance.
Goroooo001
for me, these times have come with the release of GTA5 on PC when maximum textures not enough video 3GB on my 780-Oh, a new tomb raider is confirmed
burn consolato
The fact that there is a proposal for Power Color RX470 Red Devil version of the boost, new sealed for 5800 UAH. So I think what to do.
With 3 gigs do not take the memory is not to be missed constantly. Now there are games that are more than 6 gigs clog. It should be at least 4 gig but better at least 6.
lecoharv
on the contrary proper texture compression from AMD and NVIDIA, much worse.
1060 GTX 3Gb is the pumpkin better RX 470. The optimum, of course, is the GTX 1060 RX 470 6Gb or 8Gb. Even if the chip GTX 1060, she'll sit on ass in front of the RX 470, when the memory consumption will drop for the third gigabytes, which is almost all modern games.
There's already a GTX 980 with four gigabytes before GTX 1060 with six die beginning, and you about three gigabytes in 2016. About Kepler with two or three gigabytes is generally better to remain silent.
N1KО
On 4гига did not take it-plus only Spirovska version 470 has a memory frequency of 8000 Mhz-all others reduced to 7000 and you especially will not be dispersed because the only reference radika have a memory from Samsung(it's great being chased by) nezifah is memory from Micron.
Now about the price of 5800 is a very good offer-but it is not clear then your indignation in the first post-what NVIDIA ultra cheap and super productive-as you can see it is not so three gigs version 1060 will be better in games but worse in DX11 games c Volcano and DX12
warp 37
Warp where you paid up this nonsense dug up? 960-30 GTX 280X fps and 16 fps I just yesterday came the incentive to the friend to broadcast the game, his 960 gives less fps in 1680-1050(anyways not Fosd) than my 280-ka in 1080p
So this graph is bullshit and the website on which it bungled
gtx 1060 performance bypasses all of the RX and gtx 970.
with 3gb gtx 1060 - the cut, bullshit. complete draining.
legusor wrote:
gtx 1060 performance bypasses all of the RX and gtx 970
Since when 5-8 fps is great around? so in the area of error-card is exactly the same 1060=RX480-first works better in the old games and new on DH11 and the second works better with the Volcano and ДХ12
I remember in the days of 256 vs 512MB, the latter had the advantage of some х1900хтх anally punished negoiator 7800 with 256MB
much the same happened during the soap despondency 512 vs 1024.
now about times like sunrise elementary pastena. those affect the performance of the chip and amount of memory. the growth ends only when the computers will be in 2 or more times more memory that can use the console. those on 8GB rather and end. 16 GB is unlikely under the current consoles the game will be able to master.
in turn 4GB it is not something that is clearly separates from ultramax. you can play on fury x for example, and any 4GB card but it will place greater demands on the entire system as a whole.
for this reason, the common pitch strategy is to be greedy not worth it on a card about 8 and 6 geburah. and about the durability of performance in mid and low segment of natural speech can not go. the situation is normal and many years before that.
burn consolato
Well, I made conclusions on the basis of the prices in the shops, I buy from the person who ordered it from abroad. I understand that we slightly overestimate the price now on 470, in reality, the 1060 is a bit expensive to obtain.
N1KО
So I wrote to you about the purchase of maps of Poland we have in the stores doesn't even have to go-here is an example of Sapphire RX 480-8Gb Outlet 11300 hryvnia she if to bring Poland out of 8,250 USD-just think about the 3 piece the difference-and now the funny thing is-the fattest ASUS Strix 1060 with a frequency of 1620Mhz is on the same Outlet, it's cheaper 10800 480 key from Sapphire-this is where Hochma.
So to judge the cards from the perspective of price-performance backed by our stores is not grateful and stupid.