Guiding constructivism
This is if we describe the ideology of the Russian authorities in one or two words.The authorities tell us about some constructivism, some even do it... But then they close. So I decided to clarify, so what's the matter?
So we lack constructivism. And here he is. And there's no such brow. So why? Because he's a guide, and that's what recommendation constructivism meant. That is to explain constructively, if what is wrong, and not to direct constructively, if that is wrong. The prerogative of direction on the way is true, if that is not the case: what is constructive, what is not- it is only in power.
Let's say mate. Is it a recommendation? No, the mat has a guiding character. Or hand-wringing. It's also a guide. The path is true. If something's wrong. If he made a stumbling. But it's not constructive. Like savages. As in the Soviet films about the struggle of the Reds with whites: "Are we a gang? We'll judge. People's Court." That's constructive. Unlike whites. As well as here a fine instead of a mat. Or instead of hand-wringing. Constructively, but it's all guiding. Simply instead of a non-constructive direction mate or hand-wringing direction constructive fine. That's it. But this guiding action on the way is true. It's not a recommendation.
And if some person understood constructivism in relation to the government in such a way that it is necessary to the authorities not to matter, not to put in force against it - to act not constructively, but constructively - it is fine, directing in the right direction, in a rut, if it has come down from it, then it turns out that we have what we have.
As for the government, it is necessary to work with a tongue, and constructively. If something's wrong. That's what it meant. But not directing it constructively, fine, for example, if that is not the case. Such prerogative of directing action is only in power. What's constructive, again, that's not.
And if it was about it, is it worth it then, what is called, so to work? Constructively, or not... As my grandfather used to say to me, "Everything, I said it. I'm going to do it my way anyway." So we're just given this opportunity to speak constructively? If what's wrong? And someone thought that constructively send. If something's wrong. I don't think so. Only power can be directed. We're just messing up. Whether constructively or not is another matter. That they're pointing out that we're messing around.
zirack
zirack wrote:
The most honest wage was in state farms, joint economy. When several families united, created a joint farm, and the profit was divided in equal shares on all participants regardless of the position, whether it be the boss, the cleaner, the tractor driver, the milkmaid, etc.
Do you know what you're talking about? People in the village and in the village were forbidden to have their own vegetable garden, their own farm for personal needs. Instead, they had to work in collective farms and state farms for the state, which something there then gave them for it. More precisely it was possible to have, but not to the detriment of the state. Like a hobby. In my spare time. It's not like that. In general, how was it in the Russian Empire? Everyone had his own vegetable garden and his own farm for personal needs. But it's in ordinary people. And those who are taller, there were also fields in personal property, which also grew something, hired peasants there for this, but not for personal needs, and for sale, of course. It was the landlords or the fists that were. My grandmother, as she says, her mother during the war had a personal hidden field, where they secretly grew wheat, rye, potatoes ... Which was forbidden. But since her mother gave the front a lot from him and not only from him all sorts of pro-extensions (they still had otars of sheep, goats, herds of cows, horses), it was closed to it. In short, the main thing was to pay the state, and not to leave everything for themselves, as all these landlords and fists did. It was all right then. As with taxes now, in principle.
It's kind of what it's all about. Not that a lot of land was in personal property, but that nothing was paid from it to the state. That is, in the most stingy nature of all these landlords and fists. It would not have been paid less. So we made 6 hundred to everyone, from which nothing should be given.
zirack wrote:
And there are state farms now, but very few, in certain regions.
I think that's the way it is. I've never seen a field on private property. It's not for sale yet. And state farms are a subsistence farm. All cows, horses, sheep, poultry - all the animals in them is. Collective farms are vegetable gardens, in general, in fact.
zirack wrote:
Terms of pay, and care from them. As today, for example, there is an employment contract, an employment code, pay standards, but they leave under the pretext - do not like to quit. Or use the lack of knowledge of their rights employees.
You can think of anything else. To have a job and no payment. Only any laws will not be. There can be no such laws. As well as the legalization of marijuana, third sex, dp, something else from the EU. It's all about legitimising. It's something to throw away right away.
Denis Kyokushin
He left. It's an unwelcoming atmosphere. With hint that they need different content from you, not this one. How the fool has already started to look with his mods there. And with the maintenance of these games in general. Doing it ostensibly for fun. For free, that is. But it's not about what's free, it's about having fun. Help in pleasure, so to speak. As if it were all clear. That they don't need all this game content from you. A little different. And me too, in principle, if that's the case. Normally only. I don't play all the games I bought, so I don't play. I'm buying for the future. Someday I'll play them in Europe. And if you don't, you don't.
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
How you don't twist, and flow, do, do not do, and in huge volumes flow, and judging by the way you live for 400 bucks a month, they flow in my direction with a huge volume. Well, somewhere has gone, and the mules have arrived.
I wonder the girls are dancing: and what did you get from it?
Spoilerou amers have a bad habit of pumping their heads with fiction, It's like winning the Second World War with the help of a land-lease. But America defeated Hitler.
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
That's how you fight, no reasonable man fights.
That's why Omerag did not win a single war. They were singed to fight even with ideas, with bows and spears, plague blankets secretly poisoned. And Hitler would have pindos in general on the Pacific Ocean thin layer smeared, not a single piece of soap would be of Omerikian quality. )))
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
Motorway! Hospital! School! Good EP! Jobs! Production development! The future and currency backed by a powerful manufacturing complex!
You'd think it was all at my expense.
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
That's how you fight, no reasonable man fights.
Well, so it was necessary to open the second front at once, when Stalin asked for it, and not to sit, thirsing on the toilet waiting, who: Hitler or Stalin.
Propaganda is, moreover, lute:
Your inventors, like Ford, actively used the free labor of prisoners in their factories in Germany, and IBM issued bills to count the same prisoners.
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
I think you're confusing the order of the site owner and your own views. The master is a master. Discussing the actions of the administration here is also forbidden by the rules! But I'm going to pump a little portico in defense. If the site belonged to users, as in a democratic society, where there are elections, there is a vote, and the people - the only power (and for control hired managers), then you would make a statement.
They're the master owners in their mailbox and can do whatever they want. Or in your cloud file storage. And this site here, so to speak, the same mailbox, only put on display to all. And cloud storage, too. And if everyone, it's not all. That's if you're all, then that's it.
By the way, the moder answered why he changed the cover of the game I downloaded. Because of Cyrillic in the name of the game. And this one was rejected because of the platforms and media in the image. It was already decided to replace the media with something on the image, but felt like a donkey, as in that cartoon about Tom and Jerry:
The alarm is, in general... I'm talking about Cyrillic in the name of the game. Well, yes, we don't see Polish titles on the cover of Dead Island, for example? But still. Another attempt to find a button, which should only click - and you're in the ladies. Right because of this studio closed - because of Cyrillic in the name of the game. Remove Cyrillic from the name- look, and will open ...
Mapplanner needs to do. And if he doesn't help, nothing will help then.
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
The individual entrepreneur, who decided to "patch" the road near his shop, will have to give 25 thousand. If the organization is found guilty, the fine will amount to 300,000 rubles."
You can't do anything until you get a piece of paper! No arrangement of independent, even a homemade playground will be demolished! Don't do that! Can't!
That's what the whites fought against - against such arbitrariness of the Reds. Why can't it be? They can, but you can't? What is the difference between industrial fishing, deforestation and non-industrial fishing? With its horrific scale. 9000 tons of salmon will be caught under a quota in Russia this year. It's legal, that's it. And you'll get a fine with your fishing rod. What's the law, whoever it is? It's centralization. No more than that. And I'm for decentralization. And no trees there, as Putin put it, do not plant after cutting down the forest, like, felled a tree- planted a new one. It was funny when he said it. It's no different grouping, it's just one. As Pharaoh said about power. And does not tolerate another or others, affectionately calling them gangster, or solitary some there. I'm kind of. Decided to help even.
Am I applying for property? Only to use it. Like the games here. You're not buying them because you're buying them, are you? You only buy the right to use this property. With public places, roads in front of the store, playgrounds and the like, the same is the case. The property is yours, but the right to use it is not yours. Or rather, not just yours. Actually, not everyone can come to your house, but in the store of some PI everyone can go. Accordingly, and the road in front of the store, he can also patch up the fact that it is not in his property. Since the right to use it is the right to use it all those who walk on it, in fact. They're there to go, and they'll stumble, especially on the way out of his shop, not the mayor or who else.
Here's a man tripped on someone else's property. But if he can walk on it, then correct it too, it means that not to stumble. That is to ensure the comfort and safety of all that he is allowed to do on it. And so to reason ... What if the mayor refuses? The property is his. He has the right. Go and stumble, like. That's.
There are people going in the bus - open the hatch and close as they are comfortable. With that bus not theirs. Do they need permission from the driver to do so? What if he says no? He has the right. It's a bus. And then what? Do you want to sit in the spirit, or in the rain dripping from this manhole? This is not a referendum or a vote with a predetermined decision. It's going to be here in kind. If you talk about someone else's property like that. More precisely, about the right to use it.
And then what? Do not ride the bus, sell the cottage, sell the store, leave Russia... get to al-qaeda, come back, install C4 on the hatch of the bus... That's what it's all about. This one came to it. I've got everybody to do it. Radically? So this is British radicalism. As with Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is disproportionate to act. Is radicalism a crime? If so, constructivism means no. It's an idea. You can just fire this driver here. There's no change. You can identify in a mental institution, where stabbing with tryftazine until it changes. Then leave it in the car park... But there will be another person. Normal.
And the way it has become here, to get out of here. Care is different. You can leave in different ways... Then come. And it is also possible in different ways. How about that? Of course I do. Peace is preparation for war.
The hint is clear. To the extent of your departure. I mean, not that you have to leave, but how much you should leave. Up to fascism. In principle, fascism is the maximum degree of care: to wipe off the face of the Earth. No more than that.