What do you say about performance on a powerful iron? (Assassin's Creed: Valhalla)
Iron:- NVidia GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB
- Intel Core i9-10900K
- 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200
- Seagate 1 TB FireCuda 520 NVMe
- ASUS ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING
- Corsair Hydro H115i RGB Platinum
- Corsair 850W HX850 Platinum
Testing was carried out with the last patch, dated November 6. Vsync automatically shuts down during the test, causing the screen to rupture.
Lex-one
It's in the test, and he's pretty weird. In the game 35-40, on the ultras, with HDR, and overload VRAM.
Let's see your load schedules, from the game, well, so shobs all cheer in the morning. )
on such iron almost everything is at maximum and theaniths in 2k somewhere 30 - 40 phps.
The quality of the graphics is indicated - customizable, but everything is exposed to a very high, that is, the maximum possible, even smoothing. You can watch the video from the time you're uploading it. So the fact that 3090 does not pull something there is nonsense.
Jay C wrote:
but everything is exposed to a very high, that is, as much as possible, even smoothing.
Yes. Only here is the resolution of 0.50, half from 1.00, i.e. 1:1. 5800GB, it's full xd with HDR, I have so many eats, a little less. In the video, of course, the benchmark is a test, but there is still UHD then not, stupidly stretching the picture twice, so can bend in the resolution of 4K, although it is doubtful. N-Vidia boasts that it and 8K will pull one screw without straining. ))
Jay C to put 4k and divide it into 2 is of course a strong move
and by the subju I understood all the problems on the powerful glands, people at 2060s 60 phps are stable in fulchd on ultra and it's great, but that's when in the same fulchd 3080 gives 85fts, and at the same time in the game there are no rays, no RTX reflections, I think it's less strange
Lex-one Yes I did not know, I noticed the current))) No one was not going to fool, twisted the settings just and everything.
msi gaming X RX5700/32gb (3600mhz)
Excellent optimization, ultra settings, 70-100 phps1080r, when choosing a resolution of 120% instead of 100 graphone of course better, but drawdown to 50 frames, in general - optimization at a good in principle, given the excellent graphonium and the big open world in the game.
i5 10600k, BP be quiet SYSTEM POWER 9 700W, mother MSI MPG q490 GAMING PLUS Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 WINDFORCE OC GV-N1060WF2OC-6GD' Crucial Ballistix RGB Black BL2K8G36C16U4BL 16 GB DARK ROCK 4 (BK021) on what settings will go about?
Ilya Liapin
I play at 2070s, on ultra in 1080p turned on the vertical - stable 60 fps, in the benchmark ultra with vertical off - 72 frames, peeple here complains about the twitch image - I was helped by the transfer to ssd
Ilya Liapin
logic of the ppt of course, then the percentage once every year shit becomes, and in fact at 10600k he will be able to play all about 5 years