3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
s
s1ayerfox 17.12.20 05:27 am

Very low FPS at any graphics setting (Cyberpunk 2077)

I have the following system config:

I5 2500k - overclocked to 4 700 GHz
Memory 2x8 1600 11-11-11-28 - cleanly overclocked to 1866 GHz
RX 580 4 Gb video card the
game is on SSD

https://cdn1.radikalno.ru/uploads/2020 /12/15/4eb0f83400810bf1a0a0e9a1fffca3ea-full.png

Such a theme, I put the game in the FPS menu 60+
Character selection menu FPS 20-25 I
go into the game FPS from 5-10 rises to 20-30 when you bury your nose on the floor, and what any graphics settings, even the quality of the render I remove to 50% and nothing, the graphics just deteriorate in the trash FPS grows from 5-7 to 7-10 and this is in the desert at the very beginning of the game.
When I started it for the first time, I thought the percent does not pull, since it is the only one that does not fit the specified parameters into the minimum requirements of the game (I need the same socket as I have 1155, but a little better than i5-3570K 4 cores 8 threads (I have 4 cores 4 threads)) I got to look at YouTube tests and miracles, for people everything works fine on the i52500k as well as on the RX580 4GB, I already broke my head what could be the problem? Why does it work well for people on medium graphics settings is quite playable, but I have a slide show.
According to the graphics settings, I twisted everything - a maximum of 4-7 fps, at least 5-10 if you look in front of you until 20 when you bury your nose in the ground. Moreover, when you press esc in the game and the menu pops out, then the fps is 60+ at once.
Maybe someone came across this? I can't understand why people work fine and give out a completely playable FPS and I have 5-10 fps ...?
PS: Windows 10 is fresh, not official from collectors, video card drivers are of course also the latest.
16 Comments
Sort by:
h
h1d3nn 17.12.20

Check your pc for viruses (mb miner)

s
s1ayerfox 17.12.20

h1d3nn
No, the percentage in the game is loaded from 30-60 +%, the system does not load in idle mode at all. So there are no viruses.

A
Alpharius20 17.12.20

Life hack that helped me. You put the tweaker, cut off all the functions in it that your hardware does not support, they drain FPS very much, then here in the files you can find how to connect additional memory (one of the last). Overclock the hardware, if possible. Play with the graphics settings, digital foundry painted everything correctly. Total in full HD, almost all settings are on high, some ultra, some on medium or disabled. Fps 60, if not running a sprinter in a crowd, is rarely seen below.

s
s1ayerfox 17.12.20

Alpharius20
Did you have 5-10 fps before the tweaker, or was it 20-30, but after the tweaker it was 60 at high? It's just that if you believe the tests on YouTube, then the game should go on and so on at low-averages of 30-50 fps ...
But thanks for the advice anyway, you will need to try playing with the tweaker.

A
Alpharius20 17.12.20

s1ayerfox
No, brother 5-10 - it's really hard. I jumped somewhere in the region of 30 + - when I turned in the highs in 1080p, although switching to the middle ones did not add much. As I understand it, they did not optimize it at all, because chips like PTX and asynchronous calculations are not supported by all PCs and they stupidly made a build on a PC using the example of a console build, judging by the tweaker. With him, the truth is, the picture becomes rather miserable compared to the original, but those who have been waiting for 8 years are no strangers))

K
Keks 11.01.21

Same. Tried every combination of graphics settings. As a result, I had to twist everything to the left, which gives well a maximum of 58 fps. = /

S
Smartty0 11.01.21

s1ayerfox
Well, how did you manage to cure it? The very similar hat (i7 2600s + rx570), at any settings 25 +/- 10 fps :(

K
KOCMOC42 11.01.21

Is CyberEngineTweaks worth it? It has a bug that lowers the FPS.

S
Smartty0 11.01.21

KOCMOC42
Yes, it seems not worth it.

K
KOCMOC42 12.01.21

Smartty0
and reshaid? it has a problem with the buffer depth if many shaders are enabled.

l
legusor 12.01.21

s1ayerfox wrote:
I5 2500k - overclocked to 4 700 GHz
s1ayerfox wrote:
The RX 580 4 Gb video card
is quite a normal FPS for such hardware.

S
Smartty0 12.01.21

KOCMOC42
Uh, I beg your pardon, of course, but what is it? I just haven't had time to try 100,500 tweakers, configs and everything else, I haven't completely immersed myself in the topic, so to speak, sorry :(

S
Smartty0 12.01.21

KOCMOC42
And, that's it, I read about the reshade. No, in general there is nothing left, except for the game.

K
KOCMOC42 12.01.21

Smartty0
well, if it costs nothing, then you should look at the tests on YouTube, and if the FPS is the same, then you shouldn't bother. In general, with my gtx1050 I go through 30 fps and drawdowns in battle, but since I'm a lover of stealth games, I go through the game completely with stealth, since there are a lot of quests where you need to do everything quietly.

S
Smartty0 12.01.21

KOCMOC42
Eh, on YouTube a guy with the same specs and settings gives out stable 40 fps with drawdowns up to 30, and in static scenes - in a conversation, for example - it even rises to 45-50 times. Well, either he has a shit, or I'll probably go and gnaw the cactus further, what to do, and thanks for that.

S
Smartty0 08.02.21

Well, if you're interested, I'll tell you how I was able to achieve performance improvements.
1. I bought Xeon-E31220v2 (Ivy Bridge) for 2,100 rubles on alik. It does not differ from the old i7-2600s (Sandy Bridge) in performance in tests (although there is a difference in threads, cores, etc., it does not matter), but it already supports PCI-e 3.0.
2. I pushed the video card from the PCI-e 2.0 slot to PCI-e 3.0.
3. Profit! FPS has doubled.