Here!
Normal people ... The CULT of normality is widespread in society. Everyone is trying to comply with it, but there are simply no conscious criteria for it. Psychiatry divides everyone into hysterics, schizoids, paranoids, maniacs, obsessive, depressive. They love to divide and classify everything, they cannot live without it! They will competently tell you about all the deviations, but no psychiatrist will tell you what normality is. NEVER! What do you think it means to be normal, adequate. Give the definition of normality, as a normal adequate person. Heh!Normal can only be someone who is not afraid to be himself, even if he is someone from the list above!
And what, normality is a reliably physically known quantity, measured in adequacy per kilogram of weight? As you know, there are no healthy people, there are under-examined people. This statement is all the more true when it comes to mental health. Everyone has their own concept of "normal person" ... Everyone is normal for himself, while others seem strange to him and vice versa ... There was such a joke: if you take all people over 100 %, of which 1% are schizophrenics, 1% are idiots, 1% are nerds, 1% are alcoholics, 1% are drug addicts, 1% are autistic, etc., etc., then there will be no one normal! The main thing is that the person himself feels normal and does not dance to someone else's tune. You cannot be guided by others in assessing your own normality. My point of view is that normal people do not exist at all. Everyone will somehow be wrapped up in their own way. All this " Every normal person is actually only partially normal. Freud))) Every normal person is actually only partially normal. Freud)))
-DENIMUSS - The
statement of the psychologist
from St. Petersburg Ekaterina Potapova, based on how she herself speaks on personal observations and reflections.
“All the most beautiful things in the world are made by narcissists.
The most interesting is schizoids.
The kindest is depressive.
The impossible is psychopathic.
The healthy make almost no contribution to history. "
Self-Relliant wrote:
Give a definition of normality
Unscientific amateurish definition: normality is a person's compliance with your patterns of behavior and way of thinking, the subjective perception of a person in a positive context based on comparing himself and him. Well, then from here a normal person is - the one who looks like the one who compares.
Neither adequacy nor normality can be objective, therefore they have no exact and unshakable definition in science.
Self-Relliant
Normal - if you are aware of your actions. I remember in the Orderlies of Dungeon 2 there was an entertaining test for normality, quite simply and clear, to express like this: "no psychiatrist will tell you what normality is. NEVER!" Is not worth it, because you have not interviewed psychiatrists for sure.
I know that everyone is different. This means normalcy - it turns out what the majority has.
"Normality" depends on the customs and foundations of the local society. For example, in the civilized world, being gay is normal, in our savage countries it is disgusting and abnormal.
Normality is an abstract and relative concept. Everyone has their own concept of normality. However, there are generally accepted concepts that society dictates to us. Nevertheless, no one can give you the most accurate definition, because it simply does not exist.
warp 37
Yes, for sure, and creating a party of pedophiles is all in civilized countries, but not in our "savage" countries who taught these civilized countries to go to the toilet and wash at least once a week.
Lord of nord
All this does not guarantee that others will consider you normal.
L | EMEHTATOP
and what is this reality? You all moralfazhstvuete and really can not explain how to imagine the world.
L | EMEHTATOP
came - give a shit - left. This is you ... I don't even know what to say.
Give the definition of normality, as a normal adequate person. I will give it as abnormal and inadequate :) The norm is a set of qualities inherent in most of the sample. But ... by adjusting the sample, you can get any norm :)
And the adequacy is also from there, an adequate person is one whose behavior corresponds to that accepted within his circle of communication and stay.
This is not something good, no matter how much our shkolota would like.
Statistics are dealing with this bullshit as the most deceitful of the sciences :) Feints of the kind "after questioning the inhabitants of the cock's house, we made a paradoxical conclusion that a normal person is a cock and nothing else" is her element.
Since the mind is subjective, and the norm should be objective, then there are no normal people. But there are clinical deviations that do not allow being in society, the rest are considered normal. They do not pose a threat to society and do not consider society a threat, their thoughts and actions are understandable to society,