3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
t
the endless misanthropy o 23.12.20 12:27 am

Taxation of video bloggers

You are not bombarded by the fact that plowing like a galley slave, you honestly give 13% to the state, and the growing community of streamers and bloggers feels above the law. Any income is subject to taxation, and there is no need for turbulence in the Duma and discussions on the Internet about the greed of the Ministry of Finance, as if they were sleeping and seeing what other taxes to come up with. Legislation has long been formed: in the network or in the entrance, the concept of benefit does not change. But the archaic system of the Federal Tax Service does not give a damn about this, because you can drag the long-suffering VAT to insanity. After all, the average age of the leadership of any regional structure is close to 50. These people do not know about twitch. Thus, there is a whole layer of recipients of material benefits, ignored by the tax service, simply due to the traditional definition of a position in our society regarding the number of wrinkles. And so everywhere: Decisions are made and power is exercised by the surviving mummies with an inoperative tap. At the same time, we have a prime minister - a notable fan of Twitter, but this question, suddenly, does not bother him either, apparently because he keeps a blog, and maybe drives him to Dotan.
28 Comments
Sort by:
-
- DILOR- 23.12.20

If you pay taxes, then it should be considered work, and go into your seniority. In terms of streamers, this is unlikely to change anything, if I understand correctly, the main income comes from donations, and this cannot be taxed in any way. Today he received a million a month later a donut, because they banned him, and the state cannot provide him with safety and stability of labor, so why the hell should he pay? Anyway, these are donations, let's start with ballot boxes in churches to take deductions to the state. Although I am all hands and feet for making this garbage as small as possible on video hosting ..

s
stalker7162534 23.12.20

"Ivangai (English EeOneGuy; real name Ivan Rudskoy; born January 19, 1996, the village of Alexandria, Dnepropetrovsk region, Ukraine) - letsplayer and video blogger [1],
In May 2016, the magazine" Kommersant Money "published an article" Tax on antics " , where he estimated Ivan's estimated annual income from the YouTube partner program at 300 thousand dollars. The article also mentioned the proposal of the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy, Innovative Development and Entrepreneurship Anatoly Aksakov to create a register of people who receive income from posting videos on blogs. that the State Duma is ready to consider the introduction of patents for such activities [3] [18]. "

I was plagued by vague doubts about topikastera
Spoiler

t
the endless misanthropy o 23.12.20

My friends, you confuse a penis with a finger. It is not necessary to recognize video blogging as a profession and pay a pension. Renting out an apartment is not a profession. The experience is dripping only with a contractual relationship concluded under the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. In addition to work, you can get money in other ways, the legislator knows and takes this into account.

Personal income tax (PIT) is the main type of direct taxes. It is calculated as a percentage of the total income of individuals minus the documented expenses, in accordance with the current legislation.

Persons obliged to independently declare income:

individual entrepreneurs;
notaries, lawyers, other persons in private practice;
individuals on remuneration received not from tax agents;
individuals for the amounts received from the sale of property;
individuals, residents of the Russian Federation on income received from sources located outside the Russian Federation;
individuals, on income, upon receipt of which tax was not withheld by tax agents;
individuals who receive winnings paid by organizers of lotteries and other risk-based games;
individuals who receive income in the form of remuneration paid to them as heirs of the authors of works of science, literature, art, as well as authors of inventions;
individuals who receive income from individuals as a gift.

Example:

Income earned by individuals from teaching and consulting activities is subject to personal income tax.

is not equality before the law justice?

R
Russian_Lawyer 23.12.20

Wing42
bro, you probably haven't tried to blog on youtube. It's like begging in the transition: if you get up and stand with a mug for a couple of days, then on the third day a couple of strong guys will come up to you and ask you to share the proceeds or to dump. Also here. Try to start your own channel and if it collects a certain number of subscribers, then in a couple of months the YouTube administration will contact you and persistently ask him to monetize, and if you refuse, then very soon your channel will be gone. YouTube has long been a serious commercial resource and you just can't fit in there. In addition (I found out in detail) you will have to buy ads on YouTube, order promotion, etc. In other words, you must first invest and not charisma, but real rustling money and only then .... So this is a full-fledged entrepreneurship and it is appropriate to tax it.

R
Russian_Lawyer 23.12.20

-DENIMUSS -
Alexey Chichigin
no, almost any income is taxed, and not necessarily a profession (read the Tax Code), even if you made a one-time transaction or rented something out - tax!

b
bukowski 23.12.20

Regulate everything! Got money for a wedding - pay tax, on others too. Presented with a service - unfasten the cup. Received a tip - 13% to the state. The author, I propose to introduce a tax on coins found on the street. Found a ruble - return 20 kopecks.

s
stalker7162534 23.12.20

bukowski wrote: Found a ruble - return 20 kopecks.
But don't tell Medvedev about it!
:)

r
requiemmm 23.12.20

is not equality before the law justice? No, because the law protects the interests of those to whom it does not apply. The law is unfair, so its violation is already at least some kind of justice :)