What gaming now take up to 20k?
Hello everyone. What is now gaming on IPS, 144 Hz, 24 "(it won't fit on the table anymore) can I take? I would also like to have a frisink in it, a matrix with good color rendering and fast response, Full HD resolution is quite enough, I see no point in a higher resolution for 24 ". For the money 20 + 2 to the maximum.He himself said that if you buy a monitor, you don't always just play on it, someone coding, and in this case someone needs more portrait orientation, someone can use the monitor first for games and then as an additional panel for displaying information, flexible setting - it is always good, it is not clear why you need an RCO in order to send a letter?
Well, in general, I looked live. The picture is actually great. Natural colors. There is enough brightness and contrast. The minimum brightness level is low, you can play calmly even at night; 60% was already enough for me, at home I would generally use it at a lower value. In general, I ordered myself an XG2405.
The fact that there would be no problems with brightness, and so it was clear, usually VA had such problems, but on IPS with a range along it, everything was fine, how the main thing comes, see that there are no broken pixels and tell me how the gradients, normal or ladder go what lug and what I checked.
Ninio
It's funny to see this
Ninio wrote:
The fact that there will be no problems with brightness and so it was clear, usually VA has such problems
and
XG2405 color gamut by SRGB 120%
Sorry, I could not resist. One question, what for you write THIS?
Pirogo4ek wrote:
In general, I ordered myself an XG2405.
And where he looked there immediately it was impossible to pick it up?))
Ryazancev wrote:
I beg your pardon, I could not resist. One question, what for you write THIS?
For me personally, these concepts are difficult, but I understand the more the better. After all, in the monitor, first of all, you pay for the image quality, because there are analogs that are cheaper than this Vyusonic, only there will not be such indicators.
Ryazancev wrote:
It's funny to see this
what's funny to see? that the brightness in a small range is adjustable, and that I had a monitor on VA which was about the same as the spotlight shone that at a brightness value of 100 what is 20?
Ryazancev wrote:
I am sorry, I could not resist. One question, what for you write THIS?
write what? I substantiated why, the higher the RCO is higher than the monitor's capabilities.
DikeyFive wrote:
No, it was more expensive there.
Ninio wrote:
The fact that there will be no problems with the brightness and so it was clear, usually these are VA problems, and on IPS with.
Honestly, I don’t know, because VA didn’t have a chance to use it.
In general, the monitor arrived. There are no highlights, very small at the edges, but they are visible only when the system is booted, but not in games. There are no broken pixels. And in principle, everything is fine. The picture is excellent. The picture is very smooth, just unusual.
Ninio
The brightness depends in large part on the quality of the monitor.
I have no VA, there is a noticeable difference in the ranges.
IngwardIn
Well, on overclockers, this problem on va often rose, for example, I don't touch the monitor's brightness at all, at about 70-80 units it costs 250 nits at the monitor. Pirogo4ek
what does a smooth picture mean? moving slowly or large trails, the picture should be clear and well detailed.
Ninio wrote:
let's just say, on the old monitor I had a twitchy picture, I would even say stalled. Even sometimes, when scrolling the browser, the loops were visible, but there is no such thing, the picture is both in games and during normal use, smooth and clear.
Ninio
My early post dealt with your inductive biases. This means that:
1. A single case will never form a rule that applies to all such types.
2. Judgments based on the inductive method are erroneous with the highest probability.
3. By applying this type of judgment (thinking), it is easy to become a biased fanatic.
The issue has been resolved, the client is satisfied. I didn't want to offend anyone.
PS Previously there was IPSovy Vyusonic. Was deliberately replaced by VA. Available DELL VA 165 Hz "32" 2560 * 1440 (8 bit + frc), PHILIPS AMVA-60 Hz @ 65 Hz "32" 2560 * 1440 (10 bit), Vyusonic IPS "27" -60 Hz @ 75 Hz (8 bit) ... And there is a set of conclusions, which, to put it mildly, DIFFERENT.
Moved from IPS because of the need to work on the photo. Correct White Balance, Gamma and Wide Contrast are badly needed. And for small funds such ips cannot be bought. Yes, and the PROF of the IPA level for OPERATION is all at 60Hz and with 2.5-3 times less contrast. Who "pulled" the shadow from RAW will understand.
Ryazancev
For the most part, this whole ips chase is just a marketing template, many people want IPS, but don't know why.
Ryazancev
I had a sample of 5 different monitors on VA all 2019-2020, while I touched on this topic only because for some it is important to change the brightness of the panel so as not to interfere with the rest of the people in the room, for example - a one-room apartment, wife is sleeping , you play / work. and the XG2405, which was talked about above, has no problems with this, the contrast is normal, even if it does not reach va.
Ninio, by the
way, yes, the minimum level of brightness is also comfortable for playing, everything is in principle distinguishable and should not be considered, and not disturb the household. I just have a PC in the room where my wife and I sleep.
Pirogo4ek is uncomfortable
for me personally, I never set the minimum brightness, in most cases, just additional consecration is enough. I have a separate desktop, because besides everything else, there is also noise and heating of the iron itself.
IngwardIn wrote:
Many people want IPS, but don't know why.
I agree, for me and wa the golden mean.
Ninio wrote:
I have a separate desktop, because besides everything else, there is also noise and heating of the iron itself.
I agree that the noise from the rest of the hardware will be much less pleasant than the illumination from the brightness of this 250 cd / m2 viewsonic. And how many minimum brightness can be set for this model, there are simply models where this minimum brightness is high and this is already a problem?
DikeyFive wrote:
I agree that the noise from the rest of the hardware will be much less pleasant than the illumination from the brightness of this 250 cd / m2 viewsonic. And how many minimum brightness can be set for this model, there are simply models where this minimum brightness is high and this is already a problem?
I wrote that the minimum brightness level is comfortable in the evening. What are these weird questions anyway? I have nothing to measure it with, I can't tell you its numerical value, you can try to read reviews on the XG2405, maybe they will tell you something.
DikeyFive wrote:
I agree, for me and for the golden mean.
Apparently, the main thing is that the monitor in your case simply turns on, then how it will work is the second thing, and therefore there are rumors about the "golden mean", etc., because each matrix has its own pros and cons, and XG2405 if there is a normal analogue on va, I would also consider it.