Game Optimization (Alan Wake)

mnu 9600GT has an old computer ... I play at a minimum with 1024 resolution .. during the day steel 60 fps, but at night it can sink to 20 .... satisfactory, although the game is not optimized ... The same Batman2 flew at a maximum of + physix on average.

Anti-aliasing 2, the rest at max, at 1680x1050 below 38 fps, it did not drop on average 40-50, the optimization is excellent, and the game seems to be more favored by ATI.

Whining.
On the profile system 60-75. And I don't give a shit that my monitor is shit.

Noklan_N O_o
, on your system, 2 Alans should start up and give out 100 FPS, not 38+

Normal optimization. Not complaining yet.

ChAS80
pff, and your 4 alans should start with 100 FPS

sht2ket Come on, don't be ridiculous!) There is such a word optimization. Optimal use of computer resources by a program (game) depends on its performance.

sht2ket
Don't be ridiculous , God forbid gf 560 ti will start without sagging from 60 fps.

AMD Turion II P660 2.50 GHz at 15 fps.

For whom CrossfireX must be downloaded catalyst 12.1 cap3, which was released exactly one day before the release of the game, from the official AMD site.

Before installing the ATS, the game gave me only 40-50 fps at max. settings in FullHD. Now 80-100 fps.

gpu200
Creative sound blaster x-fi Titanium - it's clear why you are sitting on XP. Creative hammered a big bolt with wood on Semaku. And to have in such a situation on the Semak a card in terms of functionality five times worse than the usual realtek is simply zapadlo.

But there is no need to carry heresy, OK?

ChAS80
viz, optimization in the game UG

This is how my game goes on a profile system:

Full ugege, who writes about ultra max with 40-60 fps, that school bolobol.

Optimization could of course be better. In Full HD on my GF 560 ti and Fenome 955th it is stable 50-60 fps. Rarely, but there are moments of sharp short drops of frames that way up to 20 (for example, when you throw a rocket launcher into a bunch of monsters, or throw a lightning gun), but 90% of the playing time is exactly the same. I twisted all the settings to the maximum possible. I set the anti-aliasing to 2X, since large values ​​actually set the FPS, and the visual difference is not visible at all.

The graphics are far from the most advanced, albeit very not bad. C grade optimization. Crisis 2 showed itself much better on my computer)

And for those who want to win a dozen fps: you can safely disable SSAO. No matter how closely I looked, I did not notice the difference in the picture. But still left))

When I wrote about 50-60 fps, I turned it down of course. Right now I looked with an afterburner - 40-50. But everything is very smooth.

Full ugege, who writes about ultra max with 40-60 fps, that school bolobol.

I have 35-40 fps with FXAA disabled and with msaa 4x (Full HD), drawdowns are up to 23, but this is rare and does not interfere with playing, so these GPU tests can be shoved in one place, and by the way I have GTX460 OC, about the above 18fps on this card neighing, set anti-aliasing to less and no problem ...

I have a 4-core atlon 3.4Ghz, 4Gb RAM, video GTS250 512mb 256bit Win 7 x64, all settings are at maximum, resolution 1280x720 because I play on a 40 '' TV at higher resolution subtitles are difficult to read, too small, in general nothing lags, it is played comfortably, how many fps I don’t know, fraps are too lazy to put

gpu200

Consider, but I'm not ready to go for this, and I tried to run it on XP - the same thing.

sumoist666, thanks for your good advice, man! The changes in the graphics are absolutely invisible, but the fps has gone up wow! In general, I play with maximum settings at a resolution of 1440x900 and anti-aliasing at 4. fps from 45 (this is in the worst places) to 60, it does not drop below. I am happy as an elephant :) I did not expect such a great optimization, and even on my log!