it was not in vain that I waited 20 hours, the Russian was already broken, it seemed like yesterday I was in the zone. : D
and starforce didn't help. :-D
Someone ran on such a thing [b] ASUS A7J: Intel® Core ™ Duo 1.83Ghz, 1024Mb, 100Gb, DVD-Dual Double Layer, ATI Mobility ™ Radeon ™ X1600 256Mb [/ b]? Or who has laptops better not to even try?
On my p4 ~ 3.2, 1024ddr, 6600gt, the game runs at maximum at dx8 quite acceptable. I like it! : gigi:
Will go ...:?
Intel Pentium 4E, 3000 MHz (15 x 200) 2.99 GHz
Radeon X1600 Series Secondary (512
Tell me something to increase performance, otherwise it slows down unrealistically even at the lowest settings ... I have an Acer Aspire 5100 laptop with a configuration - Amd Turion 64 x2 1.66Ghz, 512mb ddr2, Radeon X1300 128mb (in some applications it is written on the computer that it is 256 mb) 80gb hard. Maybe this is because of the operative ??, although a friend of P4 has -2400,512mb and a geforce 5700 at 128, the game is quite acceptable ... in the settings I turned off dynamic lighting and so on, nothing helps ... please tell me what it can to be the case ???
I advise everyone to increase the size of the paging file in the system control panel in the system performance settings ...
Gama eats immense amount of RAM ...
There is a small problem with installing a new patch. The version of the game that is installed on my computer [b] World Wide [/ b]. [b] XR_3DA.exe [/ b] cracked. During installation, it checks for its checksum. Please upload the original exe WW version to the file sharing site.
[color = green] [size = 75] Added after 37 minutes 47 seconds: [/ size] [/ color]
Found the original file, but can't download it. The speed is dropping!
Try, refill ...
[url = http: //slil.ru/24144940/1246558257/XR_3DA.exe] http://slil.ru/24144940/1246558257/XR_3DA.exe [/ url]
In my opinion, the performance in the game largely depends on the amount of memory of the video card. To play without a swap at maximum texture quality, in my opinion, you need 512 meters.
I play on AMD 3500+ (AM2) 1 GB ddr2 leadtek 7900 GS
settings: at maximum: filtering, shadows, detail. on average: texture quality, lighting range above 70%, view range 80%, sun shadows are on - and all this is in full dynamic lighting - there are no swaps at all, the speed by eye does not drop below 40 frames per second, both in dungeons and street. Yes, my resolution is 1280x1024.
When you improve the quality of textures, a swap starts ...
ps Maybe someone knows what is the use of 60 Hertz in the settings ???
[quote name = "IQ-156"] In my opinion, the performance in the game depends to a large extent on the amount of memory of the video card. To play without a swap at maximum texture quality, in my opinion, you need 512 meters.
I play on AMD 3500+ (AM2) 1 GB ddr2 leadtek 7900 GS
settings: at the maximum: filtering, shadows, detail. on average: texture quality, lighting range above 70%, view range 80%, sun shadows are on - and all this is in full dynamic lighting - there are no swaps at all, the speed by eye does not drop below 40 frames per second, both in dungeons and street. Yes, my resolution is 1280x1024.
When you improve the quality of textures, a swap begins ...
ps Maybe someone knows what is the use of 60 Hertz in the settings ??? [/ quote]
None.
In short, I put this din and was horrified by the brakes. Swap is easy! I climbed the network and found this: [url = http: //forums.playground.ru/stalker/155142/] http://forums.playground.ru/stalker/155142/ [/ url] On this forum, the guys are trying to find a panacea for optimization. It is not working yet, but there are good tips, so I advise.
In short, to improve performance in Stalk, you cut off dynamic lighting, 60Hz mode, and vertical sync is the minimum for minimum brakes. It flies like that now, there is practically no swap. True, the stalker has become similar to the first CS in terms of graphics :) But brakesoff is dumb. The increase in virtual memory to 2048 also helps. Well, plus "advanced defragmentation" using O&O Defrag and disabling any side garbage, such as Casper, Asek and everything that eats a piece of opera.
Read
Shl: after applying the above perversions, I was able to set the maximum resolution and max. graphics settings - no brakes at all, rarely swap.
I decided to play the subject ...
I can't find the optimal settings for the game so that it doesn't slow down.
config such AMD 64 3200 GeForce 7600GS 1Gb RAM WinXR
the monitor has a native resolution of 1920x1200 - my computer naturally won't handle this :-) I
even tried 800x600 (though at maximum settings) - the brakes are terrible
Bran dynamic shadows. Then you can play at a resolution higher than 800x600. Of course, the game will lose significantly in the atmosphere, but performance is more important ...
when I turn off the dynamic light completely, it is not possible to look at the game at all! the graphics are just awful!
I'd rather play at 800x600, but at least with more or less normal graphics ...
here's the GF7600GS - the graphics are worse than on PS3. sailed.
[quote name = "aladdin"] when I turn off the dynamic light completely - it's not possible to look at the game at all! the graphics are just awful! [/ quote]
Welcome to PC gaming. : gigi:
[quote name = "aladdin"] I'd rather play at 800x600, but at least with more or less normal graphics ... [/ quote]
But on a muddy screen ...
[quote name = "aladdin"] here you and GF7600GS - graphics are worse than ps3. sailed. [/ quote]
And what did you want from a piece of iron for 100 bucks? Now, if you had 8800GTX (which costs like a whole PS3), then it would be another matter ...: wink:
In general, it's not so much the fault of the vidyuha, but the "problem" in the monitor, or rather, in its size. Video cards of the lower and middle price ranges are simply not designed to work with high resolutions ...: |