Processorswith - i3 6100 (Novigrad) (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)

[Denis]
I have a cooler))

[Denis]
no city 100(97) forest 70, 4/4 everywhere even scaly can't

[Denis]
I have DDR 4

ToDaSA
I have a cooler))
Well,all right.It is up to 130W.I have the second valve on blowing hitched.

no city 100(97) forest 70, 4/4 everywhere even scaly can't
A Hairdryer was at least 45% loaded.Riesen in the White Garden 17-30%:

[Denis]
It's not the same place! City - 97% of the shows, then stir will be 100% and on the river in the forest 54%. And why so much RAM is eaten - it's DDRII or what? I have one block not scored 8GB, somewhere in the 5.5-6GB goes

ToDaSA
ToDaSA wrote:
And why so much RAM is eaten - it's DDRII or what? I have one block not scored 8GB, somewhere in the 5.5-6GB goes
RAM idle DDR4 on Win 10 x64:

I have 16GB 2993Мгц (2х8Гб)

But on the old system AM2+ DDRII RAM Packed 880Мгц:

Everything is decided long in the kernel. Although 2K was supposed to be the difference is minimal, because the higher the resolution, the lower the load on the processor. But 2 cores in 2018 is horror!

BigInteger
Yeah, provided that the FPS was less.
And that for 2k resolution? 2k (1024*2) = 2048х1ХХХ, where such monitors sell? I know a truncated 2k at 16:9 - 1920х1ХХХ.
Maybe another beguiled, where 2.5 k (2,5*1024) = 2560х1ХХХ. Here is a 2.5 k resolution.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
And that for 2k resolution? 2k (1024*2) = 2048х1ХХХ, where such monitors sell? I know a truncated 2k at 16:9 - 1920х1ХХХ.
Maybe another beguiled, where 2.5 k (2,5*1024) = 2560х1ХХХ. Here is a 2.5 k resolution.
It was so fundamentally wisenut? Although, it is not surprising if you always shove the trash level 1600X
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
1ХХХ
Strength is not enough to count? Let me help you.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
In General, the resolution of the look horizontal, vertical can be different. 2560х 1600 / 1440 / 1080. 2048 x 1152 / 1080 / 1536.
Learn to understand the resolution of the processor, and not have to make excuses.
Any adequate person knows that FHD is 1080p, HD 720p, 2K is 1440p, etc.
Just like you will write on the Internet: WHAT are YOU PICHICHI! Tibya WQXGA or QHD AND 2K IS 2048х1080 !!!11111111. Nonsense, you should be treated)))))
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
And had to reply that would justify his ignorance in front of me? And remember its antalovsky overpayment? What is posted here is not clear. In fact, the next garbage.
It was an analogy Gopnik VOVAN WOLF, like to be picked up in the transition because of some nonsense. You yourself are not funny?

BigInteger wrote:
Any adequate person knows that FHD is 1080p, HD 720p, 2K is 1440p, etc.
Area. )
I like adequate, but does not take in the sense, where is the standard of the surplus. Screen resolution does not depend, as does the aspect ratio. As Vice versa, except for the aspect ratio. Here the aspect ratio depends on everything. )

VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Enough excuses. The resolution is determined by the HORIZONTAL. Go Google it, understand it, and don't write your shameful nonsense.
Clear...
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
All the rest is marketing legend.
Okay, everybody calm down))))
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Fool to help fool yourself.
I'm not a fool)))) I Especially liked your statement about ignorance)
Lodurr wrote:
Area. )
I like adequate, but does not take in the sense, where is the standard of the surplus. Screen resolution does not depend, as does the aspect ratio. As Vice versa, except for the aspect ratio. Here the aspect ratio depends on everything. )
Yes, there is argument for argument's sake. It is boring, that makes a nonsense))))

ToDaSA
Friend, change the processor. He is weak you have a very. At least 4/8 cores and enjoy the best game in history!

BigInteger
Although, it is not surprising if you always shove the trash level 1600X
Is 1600S so bad that it is garbage you call that?

[Denis]
[Denis] wrote:
Is 1600S so bad that it is garbage you call that?
Yeah to be honest now both firms fit the stones. Especially the 4 channel platform from AMD came out good, better than 2066 from Intel. It was a retaliatory stuffing Calla as Vova.
But if you purely collect to games the computer, then the best course of Intel.
My last CPU burned module encryption, had to buy a completely new platform. Chose between 2700Х and 8700К (me for codenya), for crappy start-a lot of emulators Android and processor chugging along.
But I did still 8700К, because the game to play like it (and it is better than 2700Х), and the platform I know inside and out. What is the voltage required to lift up etc.
+ I have a miserable dies kingston(3200 MHz), and on AMD problem with that, thinly to choose.

BigInteger
I 1500Х only for games bought.Still dragging.RAM generally randomly picked,but then I read that it can be a problem.No issues raised to 2933Мгц,but it does not overclock,took 3000Мгцовые.Their mother by default puts 2133Мгц

[Denis]
[Denis] wrote:
No issues raised to 2933Мгц,but it does not overclock
IS THE ACCELERATION. Officially, as Intel and AMD support the frequency 2667, all that above is acceleration. Here, for frequencies above, the manufacturer and does not guarantee a stable job.
Take the motherboard MSI B350 TOMAHAWK, according to the specifications the manufacturer specifies work RAM frequency: 1866/ 2133/ 2400/ 2667(OC)/ 2933(OC)/ 3200(OC)+ Mhz . OS - work in overclocking. Officially specifications CPU max. memory speed - 2667MHz. That's why problems arose.

----- -------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---
BigInteger
Lodurr wrote:
but I don't get it, where is the standard of the surplus
Yes, indeed, comrade BigInteger tell us what does the standard decomposition: 720p (1280x720, 960х720); 1080i (1920x1080, 1440х1080; 1280×1080), 1080p (1920x1080, 1440х1080). What have they done? It was about the designation resolution, and the difference between 2k and 2.5 k. Ultra HD 3840x2160, one of the standards of 4k Ultra HD is in common or 3.8 k.
BigInteger wrote:
It was a retaliatory stuffing Calla
It is understandable, all comments continuous stuffing of excuses.
BigInteger wrote:
Chose between 2700Х and 8700К
+ I have a miserable dies kingston(3200 MHz)
HA! It can be seen, thanks to the owners of AMD that taught Interbrew to choose the right RAM, because even Intel showed the growth of high frequency RAM. Unfortunately, this knowledge is not reached for BigInteger, too late, and so would a more powerful processor +2 core / 4 thread on top.
the best course Intel - of course better if you reduce graphics and resolution, you will get 10-15 more frames at a frame rate of 100 and above. But the value of such indicator, as the possibility to achieve, especially with regards to new products, if a special schedule is not to understate or to collect SLI, minimum. So in most cases, the overpayment is worth it.
BigInteger wrote:
I'm not a fool))))
Praises, no praise. Ah... scholar, and messy as miracle gyrus.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Yes, indeed, comrade BigInteger tell us what does the standard decomposition: 720p (1280x720, 960х720); 1080i (1920x1080, 1440х1080; 1280×1080), 1080p (1920x1080, 1440х1080). What have they done? It was about the designation resolution, and the difference between 2k and 2.5 k. Ultra HD 3840x2160, one of the standards of 4k Ultra HD is in common or 3.8 k.
Yes, Lord, I don't care. If you memorized useless standardization in Wikipedia can take off the shelf pie.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
HA! It can be seen, thanks to the owners of AMD that taught Interbrew to choose the right RAM, because even Intel showed the growth of high frequency RAM. Unfortunately, this knowledge is not reached for BigInteger, too late, and so would a more powerful processor +2 core / 4 thread on top.
Before writing nonsense, I would know the situation in more detail.
I took DDR4 at the time of its release, beneath the 4 channel to the 2011 socket. Then, in principle, was not Ryzen and even SkyLake. To run to sell these dies for high frequency makes no sense, especially if they took 3200 MHz at standard timings.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
the best course Intel - of course better if you reduce the graphics and resolution
What lowering? What are you talking about? 8700К will be faster than any AMD CPU in games, it has long been proven by the mass tests.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
to collect SLI
Take SLI for at least 32 PCI channel is necessary. No 2700Х or 8700K do not allow this. Second is a dead technology.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Praises, no praise. Ah... scholar, and messy as miracle gyrus.
That is, you made an assumption about my intelligence that I simply do not know the screen resolution? For me 2K is 2560 by 1440, it does not matter, 2,5't care. FHD is 1920 x 1080. Just do not care, you can even splattered on the wall.
You know what's ironic? I can without problems to learn if I need it. it is important, and you will never be able to understand the design patterns, what distinguishes a container from the HashMap LinkedHashMap. Or, for example, the advantages of C++ to Java and Vice versa, and that a new brought into this world the language of Kotlin.
That's what intelligence is, think about it =)
And to sit on the forum, to prove your worth knowledge of useless nonsense, that is ridiculous of course)

VOVAN WOLF
IS THE ACCELERATION. Officially, as Intel and AMD support the frequency 2667, all that above is acceleration.
But if the die 2133Мгц and raised with suprugoj and timings to 2667?Acceleration?

[Denis]
[Denis] wrote:
Still dragging.RAM generally randomly picked,but then I read that it can be a problem.No issues raised to 2933Мгц,but it does not overclock,took 3000Мгцовые.Their mother by default puts 2133Мгц
As I wrote above, taken at the time of DDR4 on the X99 platform. Under 4 channels. Then generally the horror was. The platform, even above 2400 MHz did not take the bus)
then did the ceiling of 3000 (I have it on this profile), that is, somewhere with 4 channels, the memory speed in AIDA64 was +/- 55-60 tons, write, read, etc.
by the way is the RAM in the review on 3dnews 3000 MHz on 6700К takes all the bells of the timings.
When the CPU is gone, I had to take 8700К (because it's faster and newer, and cheaper with a Mat fee than only one processor at 99 platform). Now there's a horse dies under 4000 MHz (when there was not). But damn, if DDR4 is worth more than that. While I'm on my Hero and 8700К squeezed 3200 without problems 1.27 and standard timings and I have a speed of at least 45 tons. That is, the count raised the memory controller in 8700К that I almost catch up
4 channel memory. I still cache is not persecuted.