3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
F
Fruttik12 10.11.21 03:28 pm

Will it go? (Dark Souls 3)

Hello everyone!
I pre-ordered the game a long time ago. According to the old system requirements, my PC was suitable. And as for evil, a week before the release, they posted very bad systems.
My hardware:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz (4 CPUs) 3.6GHz Video card: NVIDIA Gefoce gtx 550 ti RAM: 8gb.
Is there a chance to play at a minimum of 30 fps?
43 Comments
Sort by:
F
Fruttik12 10.11.21

warmadik
The xbox one probably still has medium high settings.

S
Sias 10.11.21

Raibow Bitard
Yes, I phrased my question incorrectly. In your opinion, FPS 20-25 will at least be at minimum settings?

R
Raibow Bitard 10.11.21

Sias
I'm sure you will have even more than 30 fps. Here you need to look at optimization, not at the requirements for the game. The schoolboy wrote high demands, but it worked incredibly smoothly even on average PCs almost on ultra. The entire weight of modern games falls mainly on processors.

z
zZhekAa21 10.11.21

Pentium Dual-Core E5500 (2.8 GHz), 4 GB RAM, AMD Radeon R7 360 2048 MB. Will it go at least at a minimum of 25 fps?

R
Rooough 10.11.21

GeRRLord347 Same
thick.

S
Sias 10.11.21

Raibow Bitard
Yeah, as a result, the schoolboy could be played even at 630 at 4k and 30-60 fps.

T
Toxa95 10.11.21

Fruttik12
Just wait for the performance tests of the PC version on different hardware. Your old lady, of course, will not be there, but some 660 will have to be lit up there, then you look at the old comparisons of this video card and yours in the distant depths of the archives of the abyss of the Internet. Then you analyze the data obtained and draw conclusions.
But I'm ready to guarantee that your game will start and will produce at least 30 frames in a resolution of 1280x1024. That's right for anyone! And with the rest you have to think, wait a week, read reviews about optimization and only then decide.

A
Angry cat 10.11.21

rewzaq
750TI is already enough to ride in 1080p at maximum speeds of 30 fps. Radeon HD 7950 is generally much more powerful, it is not clear why it was written. Plus there was no optimization patch yet, press versions are usually very raw.
This is not a fucking minimum wage. If we are talking about a system capable of keeping stable 60 fps, then it may still seem like the truth.

R
Rooough 10.11.21

But where do you come from naive, Black plays with might and main even in the videos, drawdowns of 900r are visible, although there is an analogue 7790 which is better than 550ti% by 30 if not more ... Since he will play 2k calmly if Juan does not pull 900r ?? Developed even for Juan in the optimon could not, so what is the optimon on a system 5 years ago ???

M
MassChester87 10.11.21

Toxa95 wrote:
but some 660 there will have to light up a
GTX 660 2 times more productive than a GTX 550Ti.

T
The dying bride 10.11.21

Let's be honest, the difference between the second part is not very noticeable. And in the second, I played on medium with GT 240.
And they don’t know if they will go to gtx 550.
It looks like you don’t fumble and just measure yourself with squeaks.

A
Angry cat 10.11.21

warmadik
On Juan, at least average settings. And the version of the game there was the oldest, 1.01 was just recently delivered, when both on PC and PS4 it was from the very beginning. And then this is not a release patch yet.
Well, Fromy themselves are such optimizers that anything can be there.
Just for now, the fact is that all 950, 750 and 660 are enough to play with a much better grafon than on a Juan
http://www.game-debate.com/news/?news=19771&game=Dark%20Souls%203&title=Dark % 20Souls% 203% 20PC% 20MSI% 20GTX% 20950% 20Benchmark% 20Analysis

R
Richards 10.11.21

There are small differences from the second, and the second one on my not very powerful pavilion g7 on the laptop started almost max settings from 60 fps, so xs, in my opinion, all the rules will be with fps.

R
Rooough 10.11.21

Well, except perhaps to believe that the developers decided on the Japs to play a game of testing, although given the fact that the recommended ones cost 970 plus firewoods fitted specifically for the 900 series, they will only get rid of bugs and are not going to support old video cards ... Draw your own conclusions, I've already said everything. I can't say anything about AMD. Deep down, I also hope that the 770 will pull 60 fps on ultra, etc. but as they say, hope dies last.

A
Alexander Garifyanov 10.11.21

renbu wrote: xs
, he lags wildly on Juan (judging by the tests), and there the hardware is better
Do not forget that there is no patch of the first day)

G
GG4 10.11.21

Recommended system requirements are written for high settings, not ultra. Ultra will need at least 980th. With minimum salaries, everything is easier, they are written for low settings of 30-50 fps at 720p. So count on what your units are capable of.
http://www.game-debate.com/news/?news=19768&game=Dark%20Souls%203&title=Dark%20Souls%203%20PC%20GTX%20750%20Ti%20Benchmark%20Analysis

A
Angry cat 10.11.21

GG4
Maybe two more Titans in SLI just to be sure? And then in DS3 such technologies of the future, which may not be able to pull.

G
GG4 10.11.21

Angry Cat
What do I have to do with it? Such requirements and they really are, and not fictional. And the difference between high and ultra is unlikely to be significant, so the 970 is enough for a comfortable game, no titans are needed in sli.

A
Angry cat 10.11.21

GG4
Why did you even hammer into your head that this is for tall ones? Here is a test at maximum speed

G
GG4 10.11.21

Angry Cat
This is not Ultra, take your eyes off, 3 options are on high and even so FPS occasionally drops to 50.