Radeon HD 7870

Bugdrug

Firstly, now there is no special emphasis on the processor and RAM, the appetites of games are growing very synchronously, which cannot but please


you come from your not the fastest processor, which cannot fully heat up the top solutions.


Do contradictions interfere with each other?

I'm on fullhd and on radeon 4850.
At 1280 * 1024, games of the 10th year do not fall below 30 fps (limiting the game to max fps?).
But, it's true, my games are not just not the most difficult.
I'm talking about the game SW: The Force Unleashed 2, I'm waiting for the third one, but visually there are more changes not in graphics and physics, but there should be opportunities to influence enemies.

Do contradictions interfere with each other?
Take interest for $ 1096.00 and vidyahu 690 for $ 999. Or you can take i7 [email protected] for $ 568 and 680 for $ 500. Compare the performance in games at the resolution you need. You will get 50% of the increase - then it makes sense to take it.

VITYA_KOLYADENKO

Why is it so expensive? If I understood it correctly, then there should be no difference in games between the same Fenom II x4 and Sandy i5 2500K. That is, the difference will only be from the choice of video

Den-z2011
why won't it? Of course it will.

Dovakin997 Read the
posts just above about the emphasis on processors. My opinion is different

If I understood him correctly, then there should be no difference in games between the same Fenom II x4 and Sandy i5 2500K.
depends on the game and the video card.

Sergey Travkin

No matter how many tests I saw, there was a difference almost everywhere. And you yourself wrote that your Fenom II x4 @ 3.5 GHz cannot cope with the 7850

Den-z2011
in Far cry 3, for example, fully discloses, and with 2500K there will be no difference, but in Assassin's creed 3 - vice versa. Therefore, I repeat, it all depends on the specific game and video card.

AC3 is a processor-dependent game. It is not surprising that the AMD Phenom II X4 925 is inferior to the Intel Core i5-2500K.

Sergei Travkin

in Far cry 3, for example, fully discloses, and from 2500K there will be no difference, and in Assassin's creed 3 - on the contrary.However

, there is a desire to change the percentage and increase performance

Firstly, now there is no special emphasis on the processor and RAM.

Well, koooooooooooo ...

in Far cry 3, for example, the

Sixth Column of marketing delirium is in full swing ... The

video card that changed the top of last year will not allow playing FLHD ?! That is, HD6970

+1. And on some engines, 6990 itself.

But today's computer hardware is overly powerful.

Video cards for current games - yes. But soon after all Crysis 3 will be. Then everything will change.

Radeon 7870 will not let you play comfortably on full HD

Here are the data of one modest configuration (Core i7 3820 + Radeon 7870 - well, everything else is there) on the Witcher 2 engine in 1080p:

- high - ~ 50-60 fps;
- multithreaded rendering - 25-30 FPS (an array of 2x 7870 should increase FPS even more);
- and, according to some data, AA works better on 7870 than on Geforce.

In principle, conclusions can be drawn about other games already .... Essno, problems for the 7870 will appear when Crysis 3 is released.
So the 7870 is the most profitable solution today - but there is one "BUT" and very specific - AMD processors (in this generation of Bulldozer) the potential of the 7870 will never be revealed.

Joy McNally [Bring back the Games Convention]
The sixth column of marketing delirium is in full swing ...
unfortunately for you, I have every right to say this, because:
1. With Phenom II X4 @ 3.5, HD7850 overclocked 39% increased in Far cry 3 35% - there would be no difference at all with an emphasis on the processor.
2. With 3570K, the game runs at exactly the same speed.
---------------
theory is great, but practice is not a competitor.

Den-z2011
However, there is a desire to change the percentage and increase the performance of the
video card first change.

Joy McNally [Return the Games Convention]
AMD processors (in this generation of Bulldozer) will never reveal the potential of the 7870.

Gentlemen .. When will you run out of hallucinogenic mushrooms there, huh? ;)

Sergei Travkin
Spoiler Yes-a-a-a-a-a Seryoga, you are just like our government in Estonia, they say one thing, but they do the opposite! Not permanent and you turn out to be a person especially in your words. Also on 10/26/2012 here http://forums.playground.ru/hardware/744932/#10062254 you claimed that it is not wise to switch to 1155 now, but what about yourself?

19Alex75
Not permanent and you turn out to be a person especially in your words

Spoiler Our Seryozha is a grim traitor :) I told him about this more than once in HP. wrote ..

-Sergey Viktorovich,
why did you buy a giraffe, eh, greens? Sold to pizix with giblets ...

Sergey Travkin


+100

hakamada
The increase will not be particularly noticeable, if only it is changed with the expectation of a subsequent upgrade of the processor.

Sergei Travkin
where did my words go against my deeds?
I'm not talking about fanaticism for one of the manufacturers, but about your words about the 1155 socket. The mother herself is in the guarantee, and if they offer a replacement, I will ask the mother for the 1155 socket. money for the i5 has already been set aside.
I wrote
I think now socket 1155 is much more promising than our AM3 +
Did you answer more
promising? Socket 1150 and Haswell are on the nose, no one will remember about 1155.
Here you and I were ranting
http://forums.playground.ru/hardware/744932/#10062254

19Alex75
it will be so, no one will remember about 1155. It's just a perspective perspective, but I really want to play Assassin's creed 3 right now, 3570K without overclocking provided a 100% increase in it.