3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
A
ApocalypseLV 10.11.19 11:33 pm

Is it necessary to change percents i7 4770k to i7 8700k?

Or wait for new generation?

Config of a computer:
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64 bit, Intel i7 4770K 4.3 Ghz, 16 GB RAM MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Aero 11GB OC, LG Flatron W2261VP 1920x1080 60 hz

Upd: looked into 9700К. What do you think?
100 Comments
Sort by:
i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

Steve Taller
Smoothing twirled, sharper looks but in General the same. I've quantum break on Tiago started and just was horrified..the card is at the limit..sometimes something like 60 holds, heats like a bagel launched. But blah, it just do nothing, no full smoothing, no textures normal or replicas polygonati..how this bitch manages to eat the card do not understand Nitsche

S
Steve Taller 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
Kvantum is very demanding and the percent of the map without zooming for ultra you need at least 1080ти

d
dobro4insky 10.11.19

If anyone is interested,9700k 1070 2k

Spoiler

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler

d
dobro4insky 10.11.19

Spoiler

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

dobro4insky
It would be interesting if you're on PTS low resolution and ultra the whole thing waste, to see how much stone min fps issues

d
dobro4insky 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
If you're interested,let's do this,not today,you know...

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

dobro4insky
Certainly come, and then I 4790к in the same conditions skin. The vehicle will clearly see the difference between generations and the topic can be closed.

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
iMelnikoff92 wrote:
There is, 1080 was one time ultra not stretched to 45 fell. With 1080ти now a half game ran ultracap with the scale 120. Below 60 did not fall.
Lying to you my friend ))) 1080ти for iron is 40% faster but in reality in games the margin is 30% and according to your lies, take for at least 60 * 1.2 / 45 = 60% so lying to you my friend )))

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

KillKammbest
You bolly Christmas down my throat got Mr. math?

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
No I just all of the exactly calculated but you do not say )))

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

KillKammbest
I owe You now to justify Mr. math?

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
Why make excuses? I have already said you just LIED and you're here why we started a discussion to dissolve.

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

KillKammbest
Okay, fine..in the evening will fill vidosik)

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
Just a test run, so 1080 in the net shows on ultra 1080p 71 fps and 2K - 50 fps. But because of the possible impact of PERC test in 2K, so 1080-I to the bench in 2K gives 50 fps according to your above conclusions 1080ti should give 80 fps. As they say numbers don't lie ))) And I still take into consideration the scale as from 1 to 2 but it seems there is at 200% already goes out to 4K, but I don't know, and so just used a factor of 1.2.

i
iMelnikoff92 10.11.19

KillKammbest
Sha gash you vidosik on ultra and FullHD with the scale 120. Took Slippers shivering after holiday hands in order to justify his good name and tarnish yours. Recording with a computer eats 5-10 frames, therefore, decided so.

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
I wrote above that as a Yes, if not read Umesh then it's your problem.
Here's an example video comparing the performance of:
Spoiler
Show me at least one point where the difference is 60%, although I think there is a standard 30% but maybe if you're lucky you will find 35% but you show 60% )))
iMelnikoff92 wrote:
And just Mr. accountant, FSO order..you make me sick
I do not understand humor? And as for your still something to prove, to include fantasy? when we can all just quietly calculate. And according to your above vidosu if you put in your system 1080-Yu and so as to disperse the fps on ultra in 1080p (no scaling) does not fall below 54 but if you also enable scaling to 120 is below 45 )))

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

iMelnikoff92
I personally answer did not see. Where at least one proof gap 60% performance? which actually is impossible in principle when the 40% difference in iron and to tell stories can all )))

K
KillKammbest 10.11.19

dobro4insky
iMelnikoff92
Of course he confirmed, but would say that was drawdown to 10 fps but switched to 1080ти and there is a stable 60 and showed a video with a stable 60 and what it is that confirmed? To do was to say that the earth is flat but moved to 1080ти become stable 60 and showing a stable 60 it is thus confirmed that the earth is flat, as the nonsense of your thoughts catch???
I just as they say, turned his head and checked and under it lies the gap between the graphics card 60%. Further he posted a video where 1080ти test it scored average of 72 fps and 1080 in the net-I am gaining 71 fps, all due to the fact that he ran into a percent and so I was asked to make a video in 2K because this meaningless test he did PROVED NOTHING. Yes, and in principle can not prove because the gap between vidyuhi 60% simply not possible due to the 40% difference in iron and in reality, in games the gap is 30%.

-
-SK.art- 10.11.19

lads, che I nichrome not understand, about what dispute? In 2 words.. Come to uncle Serge, schA it all then judge)
PS: and don't swear to me here! That bequeathed us nice Leopold the cat? That's right: let's be friends!))

A
An__ei 10.11.19

Is there any effective way to change CPU and GPU . Overclocking does not affect me , clocked the CPU to 4600 MHz and the memory to 2133 as a result of temperature rising and the GPU and CPU don't change.