Is it necessary to change percents i7 4770k to i7 8700k?

An__ei
And why should it change? Percent ancient as a mammoth's Tusk.
https://ark.intel.com/ru/products/75123/Intel-Core-i7-4770K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-3-90-GHz-

This is the first time. Second, I have коре2 Е8600 the same garbage was ГТХ960. Nothing broke up, didn't touch anything, it worked with the standard 70% load of the GPU, and ПСЕ2.0х8. For full HD her it was enough. Ultra card in full HD loaded to a maximum of 40%. Acceleration that does not change moreover only make it worse. I always say, if you are under full HD acceleration system, how do you play in 4K is going. ))

An__ei
Ie. you have as much as 16 MS for the percent? something a lot like that. The origin is very demanding on memory and possible throughput and not enough.
I have a test on the ultra percent on average actually only 6 MS at locked 60 fps (there's even a never fps did not drop at least until 59)
Spoiler
Chased and Alexandria on the ultra review on 115
Spoiler
There can be seen that neither none nor a cent in a hundred do not run and perhaps just because of the speed of RAM, or corny because of the engine.

Yoba1212
A continuous stream of complete nonsense, the reality has nothing to do not having.

KillKammbest
Nonsense at you, and sploshnyakom. )
Don't like what I write, won the bench i7-6700K vs i7-4790K GTX 1080 , the same problem.
Spoiler

The one you are normally, with frames 5:11. You have your video it is seldom laid out, the soap is watery eyes. :D)

KillKammbest
Acceleration nothing gives these two figures perfectly at all frequencies. At 4700 MHz on the CPU test in aida64 stability in throttling takes me when RAM 2400 Windows hangs at startup.

ucher.u
My settings are the same as in that video that you showed. In the test, the percent with 4 cores + 4 threads, I have 8 cores. The result can see in my video. And by the way your video is not too much bother with the quality of the recording and there it is almost the same as mine.

Here's the original video does not Paraty YouTube: (just download it and don't look in the preview)
https://yadi.sk/i/XcO98Zl_6gcSoA
I do not have any capture cards to capture video in high quality and I absolutely don't know how it should be treated and those who know go hours powerful computer to render the video. So this is the maximum quality that I can record. The settings I have are the same as in your video, so you can compare the performance.

An__ei
So just change the % and simply did not have enough cores.

An__ei
That's the temperature....And cooler lohmatit under 2 thousand,it will not slow....
Spoiler

the no guys ,all your proof that the percent is not drawn based on a shitty engine they ,all the other 99% of games pull even i7 920 in Full HD 60 Hz

Chu bit off topic, but do not create a new top. in General, the experts. Should I change fx8300 or fx6300 on 8370? Or is it the flea?

oranzheviymamont
the difference you will see,but not worth it....1600/2600 look at them...Familiar 8350 changed to 1600,pissing with boiling water directly into the knees of the growth....

dobro4insky
I socket dance. I ам3+. KRC. If I want to increase the normal will have the platform to change at least for AM4.

dobro4insky
The crackdown was the ultimate. Slightly overclocked CPU to 4.5 cpu core voltage left at auto, RAM c 1600 to 2133 dram voltage on auto .
Spoiler<





>

SPR1GGAN
Why, on a multi-core percent origin well drawn, I like Alexandria (the most difficult for the processor location) the fps average is generally above 70. The origin is simply too big detailing what percent has to handle a lot drakelow. In addition to the percent heavy load is placed on AI mobs. And the engine in the game, quite good in terms of optimization and gives excellent picture.
Here is a little analysis and an example of rendering a SINGLE frame i.e. per second should be at least 60 of these to draw

On mnogoatomnykh indeed the origin of much better is. Remember 7700k, he was far worse than 8700k

the following system Intel Core i7-8700 BOX, Palit GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming Pro OC, GIGABYTE's AORUS Gaming H370 3 WIFI memory Corsair Vengeance LPX [CMK16GX4M1D3000C16] 16 GB, 500 GB M. 2 SSD drive Samsung EVO 970,1024 GB SSD-drive Samsung 850 EVO, the power supply Aerocool KCAS 850W RGB [KCAS-850G] in-game Assassin's Creed® Odyssey with ultra settings and native resolution with 200% average FPS 35-37 frames in the benchmark and the game itself jumps from 29 to 57.

Ale26772098 wrote:
native resolution 200%
200% of what? If 4K, so there 2080ti can not pull. Generally in assassins configuring quality of clouds mercilessly squander fps on any hardware.

vitalik76
From full hd of course.

Aloska wrote:
Full hd
If full hd, then 2080 to pull. But, again, try with a minimal quality of clouds. Everything else can be left on ultra, because it is not critical. The quality of the cloud on any hardware is bad. And loading of percents it is necessary to check. In principle, i7-8700 not the model on which it was possible to sin, that does not load the graphics card. However, if he has the cooling BOX and enabled in BIOS turbo boost, most likely the percents heated up to high (100 degrees) and reduces the frequency, because the cooler BOX is full of crap. At most this was.

Ale26772098
advice for settings to any games, they're all console ports , and this means that shadow, smoke, rays of all sorts fiziks khayr worksi just primechenie whistles and most likely even after a dozen patches to work correctly will not be on the basis of this bold move the sliders down and play.

The most popular processor on the market 9900К - Thank you AMD!

Ale26772098
given the config is the norm and nothing more then do not say. want to play upscale with 60fps – if you buy more productive pitch or lower settings on a stable 60fps.