New season, new rules. (Diablo 2)
Hello.I want to touch on such a topic as changing the rules of fair pvp. Specifically about the Amazons.
It seems to me that for a long time no one perceives the Amazons as a serious opponent in pvp (well, maybe the eski are afraid of the combo poizon amok, and even then, not all, but those who do not have 95 eu and do not have idr and shapeshift druids, because they Similar in their style to games with an Amazon (no teleport, you have to rely on your feet))
They need to be buffed a little, namely, allow knockback from gloves with any type of weapon (bow or spear).
I do not consider knockback to be unlocked imboy, all the disadvantages of the Amazon will not go anywhere (dodge lock, inability to attack normally while she is being attacked). But the Amazon will be able to kill much more often than other characters.
SpoilerIf the topic does not die out, does not go into self-knowledge, then you can discuss other points, for example, allow all paladins to use copper, if prayer does not give healing above 25 hp / 2sec, review the character resists (if anyone has any suggestions) , develop a clause on "subjective liability" (a very sensitive topic) and punishment for it (assessment of the game of pvp characters, based on their classes, for example, a non-attacking 95 eu sor, playing against bon nekra)
How many times I play on this server, I hit the pvp norms 2-3 times. it's easier to create a theme, throw off the accounts, and contact, for fire games, because on pg sho fire is not fire. as a result, it will turn into a mess)
Eta tema podnimalas iv prowlom i pozaprowlom sezone i zaglohla, hotya ya hz po4emy ne razrewit ame kb, hot nemnogo ama silnee budet.
Zato kogda combo ama stala pobejdat fire / es ei powti srazu poresali res s 90 do 85. Vot takaya vot nespravedlivost.
>> Zato kogda combo ama stala pobejdat fire / es ei powti srazu poresali res s 90 do 85.
Mb admin is playing?
asdinh0
This is great, but then let's come up with rules that will buff the Rabies of Druids, Foher, Ghost, otherwise they are also not very good at fair.
If amki are pvm Persians, then why try to invent something.
PS, however, it all depends on the administrator, and he plays a magpie. Not for fair.
Torum.
Foher, Rabies, Ghost is a type of pvp of the Pala, Druid and Asi classes, respectively.
And here we are talking about the buff of the Amazon in general.
And no need to say that the buff will affect only those who use darts, all the same, gloves with KB will allow you to change wf to something more powerful, the same faith.
Depends on the admin, but no less depends on us and how the fair pvp moderator will promote the new rules.
Last season, despite a long lull, new changes were made.
Torum.
The only criterion that determines who should be equalized with the rest of the Persians in fair, and who should not, is the interestingness of the game for and against the candidate for equalization. If the final pvp comes out as an anal passive for one of the participants and an obvious boredom for the other, then nafig such a fighter gave up. And if the result is a zest and movement, like nvn on spears, then it is quite possible to equalize by stepping on the throat of your orthodox fair cockroaches.
For me, pvp for / against a non-poisonous jaw is fun and just what you need, and you should rather apat it. And the passive poizon is a skunk that can only stink and scrape, throw the fuck out of the crowd, banning the plague on fair altogether, or raising plr / prez, so that you need 5-10 kicks per kill.
bd_sm [TDPG]
although I don't like fire pvp, I can't help but note that this version of the game is definitely lucky that you are not a moderator there
bd_sm [TDPG], I sometimes have a feeling that before posting, the firm looks in the mirror .. :-)
Obsessed
I decided that this comment would be too obvious and didn’t post it, since it’s laval grisha to write evidence.
bd_sm [TDPG], oh, but I generally changed the post (and the addressee) from more captain's to less ..; C
Obsessed
Your post of norms as it is to me. Mine would not be normal, as it would answer the aggressor to an obvious provocation.
to the aggressor
bd_sm [TDPG],: D this "aggressor" is "aggressive" out of boredom - the forum is empty ..) by the
way, I want to know things. ;-)
bd_sm [TDPG], oo, for the money yeah! I would even start a trawllette, and not like right now! ; D