What to replace the GTX 680 with
On the agenda was the question of replacing the stove.I collected the computer 5 years ago, so I moved a little away from everything and stopped closely following the news.
Briefly about the system:
Core i7-950
RAM 10GB
PSU for 1200W
Case with good cooling
In general, with our insane prices, I'm thinking of just taking the 690 off my hands, according to tests I see it plugs another 780 into the belt.
It just seems that the 900th series will not pull out the percent.
What do you think the old woman should give up on?
Options less than 4GB and AMD do not offer))
Dude, here's the most normal advice for you, look at the TEHNOKUKHNYA channel on YouTube, it’s chewed up to the limit, what percentage will pull, and what video cards are in the top now, and I beg you not to listen to cast-iron expeditions who write that your percentage of titanium will pull.
PS AMD in dx12 beats green)
Sam Smith
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-FX-8150-vs-AMD-FX-6300
and here on the contrary)
If you have a limited budget, then it's not worth changing at all, and if the money allows it, then maybe on a GTX 980 or more powerful, tk. The GTX 680 is of course inferior in power to the 970, but not so much that it would be straightforward to change it to 970, well, except if it is already junk with you. There is even nothing to say about the 960.
Inno3D Gtx 970 Ultra look, a week ago I changed 680 from a gigabyte to it, and I'm very happy with it so far.
Sam Smith is a
bit higher, but AMD FX-8150 is 8-core !!! and FX 6300 6-core
and i7 930 FX-8150 overtook in Skyrim)))
and that you are nervous, just here some offer the author to replace the percent, but it's really more powerful together with the mother at current prices will be very expensive, the best option is to put 2 * 680 they will all pull, at least until the generation of consoles changes
helio is a
Jewish picture, and even an ancient test of an ancient game ... in modern ones, the advantage of vishera reaches 40% ...
Sam Smith
give a link not to the ancient one, although why would it merge in the ancient, but in the new one wins?))) After
http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=792&pid2=252&compare=fx -6100-vs-core-i7-950-quad-3-06ghz
http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=1146&pid2=252&compare=fx-6300-vs-core-i7- 950-quad-3-06ghz,
but in general, let it be at least 400% ahead of your flashlight)
dann28
I read that the manufacturer does not matter, but I will not vouch for this, I have two identical ones. Including you yourself pump this question on the internet.
helio
you tortured the links with a bulldozer ... the bulldozer in stock is 30% weaker than the vishera .... and is equal to the ancient i7 and the vishera is 30% faster and the bulldozer 6100 and i7 any more questions ??
helio
http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=1146&pid2=252&compare=fx-6300-vs-core-i7-950-quad-3-06ghz
your link in the right column 2 TIMES the superiority of vishera .. not 30%, but 50% in modern games, the weak 6300 makes the old i7 ... and if you overclock it another 30% ...
Sam Smith
is not superiority, learn English, but the percentage of the recommended for this game))) red is weaker than the recommended, and green is stronger than the recommended and on all points 6300 merges strongly
helio
i7 even merges the 2nd generation phenom ... and before vishera it is like China