The graphics in the game (Crysis 3)
There is nobody not a secret that many have been waiting for crysis 3 because of the graphics. How do you like it? I personally did not see anything special. But I saw the lag...Graphics can compete with the first krayzisom, but not completely. Crytek have not been able to use the full potential of DirectX 11, so that there the graphics were really much better than in the first krayzise(again, killed time on the console). In fact the first krayzis is the most technologically advanced game, which is enough only DX9 for a good game. Yes, and if the use of tessellation in the second krayzise - zamentno, in the third - not so much. The foliage in the third krayzise looks like something not very good, but there is plenty of soap. Still graphics first krayzisa nicer than the third. Stupid Crytek has released raw a game with not very good graphics and impeller system requirements to all went to a new computer to buy(on the optimization of the scoring campaign).
unicorn290
Will be easier to see if to throw off on a computer, in order to scroll through and see what was more) I noticed that the building has become more detailed, shadows are more) And so basically also...
Insatiable63
The difference is very minimal)And so the dialogue is awesome!And the game itself is beautiful-all in the best traditions of the crisis)And still pisses me off that antialiasing does not work,hopefully a patch will fix)
slava.sse
On optimization, they are not scored, all because of the voracity of the processing of shadows, and a little more smoothing (who puts 16q) is also affected. Most interestingly, if these parameters are not cut, but not getting worse, unless with a magnifying glass to look for the difference. So optimized it's OK, just use your head and eyes to see when graphics settings are changed.
PS: but the grass in my opinion in the first region better) In the third it is more on the green onion looks like...
sashauzer
The shadow I once lowered, you know the crap. I but eyes, nothing to watch and are not able(physically).
at medium settings , the graphics are still very cool looks , the developers have tried on glory, so that users with average configs could nasladitsa game .
and for good optimize put patch 1.1
The graphics are super great! Well thought out and its effects , it is a pity the iron is heavily loaded even before the overheating comes :D
This schedule is the most technologically advanced and beautiful of all that can be seen today. We all know that the developers get all of the DX11. As in the first Crysis, Crytek did not think about optimizing the maximum levels of quality, in other words, they just made something more beautiful than anything seen a gamer before. And I must say, it happened again.
Maybe after 5 years, even the most unpretentious none will pull this game, but by the time we look forward to their new masterpiece :)
I have a computer like normalnuy and Crysis3 on maksimalka love it
strange but Crysis 2 at maximum speed rushing does not think
Motherboard ASUS Motherboard M5A97
processor AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor X6 3.30 Ghz turbo core
Video card AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series 1024Mb
RAM 8Gb
-AVP-
The second crisis was badly cut on the graph that the gap from the consoles was not too noticeable, because on your 6700 and it goes fine, but this one did again as a benchmark, and he loves to eat resources, there's 6700 series is not enough, you need at least 7900 or higher to play on MAX
My eyes hurt from this game. Shooting starts - voobshe do not understand what's going on: everywhere sparks, glare , grass that moves as if alive. In that mess of details and textures of the enemy if the shield is not to be used in the meter not to notice. And so... just admire the beauty.